Oral and Vaginal Probiotics and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Infertility: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-18 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000006356
Maedeh Moradi, Jessica A Grieger, Yilin Tong, Leonie K Heilbronn
{"title":"Oral and Vaginal Probiotics and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Infertility: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Maedeh Moradi, Jessica A Grieger, Yilin Tong, Leonie K Heilbronn","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between oral and vaginal probiotic use and pregnancy outcomes in women with infertility.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from database inception to December 28, 2025.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials or observational studies that evaluated the use of probiotic administration compared with either a control group or standard care in women with infertility were eligible for inclusion. Study eligibility, data extraction, risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventionstool), and certainty of evidence (GRADE [Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation]) were conducted independently by two authors. The primary outcomes were biochemical and clinical pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, and miscarriage rate among clinical pregnancies and preterm birth. A meta-analysis was performed, and the results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>A total of 16 studies including 2,339 women met the eligibility criteria for the meta-analysis. Among women with infertility, oral probiotic supplementation was associated with higher biochemical pregnancy rates (RR 1.27, 95% CI, 1.01-1.60), higher clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.71, 95% CI, 1.01-2.91), and higher live-birth rates (RR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.01-1.51). Vaginal probiotics were associated with a reduced risk of miscarriage only (RR 0.57, 95% CI, 0.38-0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a modest association between oral probiotic supplementation and early and clinical pregnancy rates and vaginal probiotics and the reduction of miscarriage; however, the quality of evidence was low to very low.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO, CRD42025626181.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"352-364"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006356","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between oral and vaginal probiotic use and pregnancy outcomes in women with infertility.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from database inception to December 28, 2025.

Methods of study selection: Randomized controlled trials or observational studies that evaluated the use of probiotic administration compared with either a control group or standard care in women with infertility were eligible for inclusion. Study eligibility, data extraction, risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventionstool), and certainty of evidence (GRADE [Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation]) were conducted independently by two authors. The primary outcomes were biochemical and clinical pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, and miscarriage rate among clinical pregnancies and preterm birth. A meta-analysis was performed, and the results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs.

Tabulation, integration, and results: A total of 16 studies including 2,339 women met the eligibility criteria for the meta-analysis. Among women with infertility, oral probiotic supplementation was associated with higher biochemical pregnancy rates (RR 1.27, 95% CI, 1.01-1.60), higher clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.71, 95% CI, 1.01-2.91), and higher live-birth rates (RR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.01-1.51). Vaginal probiotics were associated with a reduced risk of miscarriage only (RR 0.57, 95% CI, 0.38-0.84).

Conclusion: There was a modest association between oral probiotic supplementation and early and clinical pregnancy rates and vaginal probiotics and the reduction of miscarriage; however, the quality of evidence was low to very low.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42025626181.

口服和阴道益生菌与不孕妇女妊娠结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:探讨不孕妇女口服和阴道使用益生菌与妊娠结局的关系。数据来源:MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, Web of Science, Scopus和ClinicalTrials.gov从数据库建立到2025年12月28日。研究选择方法:随机对照试验或观察性研究,与对照组或标准治疗相比,评估使用益生菌治疗不孕妇女符合纳入条件。研究资格、数据提取、偏倚风险(Cochrane偏倚风险工具和非随机干预研究的偏倚风险)和证据确定性(GRADE[分级推荐评估、发展和评价])由两位作者独立进行。主要观察指标为生化及临床妊娠率、活产率、临床妊娠及早产的流产率。进行了荟萃分析,并以95% ci的风险比(RRs)报告结果。制表、整合和结果:共有16项研究,包括2339名妇女符合meta分析的资格标准。在不孕妇女中,口服益生菌补充剂与较高的生化妊娠率(RR 1.27, 95% CI, 1.01-1.60)、较高的临床妊娠率(RR 1.71, 95% CI, 1.01-2.91)和较高的活产率(RR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.01-1.51)相关。阴道益生菌仅与流产风险降低相关(RR 0.57, 95% CI, 0.38-0.84)。结论:口服益生菌补充剂与早期和临床妊娠率以及阴道益生菌与减少流产之间存在适度关联;然而,证据的质量从低到极低。系统评价注册:PROSPERO, CRD42025626181。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书