Physical activity for small- and medium-sized enterprises: what features work in real life? A Delphi study.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sebastià Mas-Alòs, Frank Vandaele, Estela Farías, Víctor Dorado, Sergi Matas, Anna Puig-Ribera, Eva Aumatell, Ine De Clerck, Anna Codina-Nadal, Emma Adams, Pieter Coenen, Bengt Kayser, Gemma Ryde, Anna M Señé-Mir, Gisela Sjøgaard, Ilkka Väänänen
{"title":"Physical activity for small- and medium-sized enterprises: what features work in real life? A Delphi study.","authors":"Sebastià Mas-Alòs, Frank Vandaele, Estela Farías, Víctor Dorado, Sergi Matas, Anna Puig-Ribera, Eva Aumatell, Ine De Clerck, Anna Codina-Nadal, Emma Adams, Pieter Coenen, Bengt Kayser, Gemma Ryde, Anna M Señé-Mir, Gisela Sjøgaard, Ilkka Väänänen","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckag100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regular physical activity is essential for preventing noncommunicable diseases and benefits both employees and organizations. Although small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) employ most of the European workforce, they are often underrepresented in research on workplace health promotion. Most existing evidence from initiatives to promote health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) focuses on large organizations and lacks insights into feasibility within SMEs. This study aimed to identify real-life HEPA initiatives perceived as most feasible for SMEs and to explore expert consensus on transferable features. We conducted a three-stage hybrid e-Delphi study including a grey literature review, an expert survey, and expert panel discussions, integrating both quantitative scoring and qualitative discussion. Experts independently rated the feasibility of workplace HEPA initiatives and participated in moderated sessions to interpret the findings and identify transferable elements. A total of 714 real-life HEPA initiatives were identified and categorized according to behaviour and intensity. Of these, 390 were evaluated by 17 international experts using predefined criteria, including feasibility by company size. No initiative-level consensus was reached across the WHO European Region. Panellists identified transferable features (most frequently in active-living and exercise/fitness domains) and emphasized adaptability, low-threshold approaches and enterprise size as an indicator. This study contributes a structured analysis of feasible workplace HEPA initiatives for SMEs, using a Delphi-based consensus process. The findings provide guidance for developing practical tools tailored to the needs and capacities of SMEs in the European context.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":"36 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13278832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regular physical activity is essential for preventing noncommunicable diseases and benefits both employees and organizations. Although small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) employ most of the European workforce, they are often underrepresented in research on workplace health promotion. Most existing evidence from initiatives to promote health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) focuses on large organizations and lacks insights into feasibility within SMEs. This study aimed to identify real-life HEPA initiatives perceived as most feasible for SMEs and to explore expert consensus on transferable features. We conducted a three-stage hybrid e-Delphi study including a grey literature review, an expert survey, and expert panel discussions, integrating both quantitative scoring and qualitative discussion. Experts independently rated the feasibility of workplace HEPA initiatives and participated in moderated sessions to interpret the findings and identify transferable elements. A total of 714 real-life HEPA initiatives were identified and categorized according to behaviour and intensity. Of these, 390 were evaluated by 17 international experts using predefined criteria, including feasibility by company size. No initiative-level consensus was reached across the WHO European Region. Panellists identified transferable features (most frequently in active-living and exercise/fitness domains) and emphasized adaptability, low-threshold approaches and enterprise size as an indicator. This study contributes a structured analysis of feasible workplace HEPA initiatives for SMEs, using a Delphi-based consensus process. The findings provide guidance for developing practical tools tailored to the needs and capacities of SMEs in the European context.

中小企业的体育活动:哪些特点在现实生活中起作用?德尔菲研究。
定期的身体活动对于预防非传染性疾病至关重要,对员工和组织都有好处。尽管中小型企业雇用了大部分欧洲劳动力,但在促进工作场所健康的研究中,它们的代表性往往不足。大多数现有的关于促进促进健康的身体活动(HEPA)倡议的证据侧重于大型组织,缺乏对中小企业内部可行性的见解。本研究旨在确定现实生活中被认为对中小企业最可行的HEPA计划,并探讨专家对可转让特征的共识。我们进行了一个三阶段的混合e-Delphi研究,包括灰色文献综述、专家调查和专家小组讨论,整合了定量评分和定性讨论。专家们独立评估了工作场所HEPA倡议的可行性,并参加了主持会议,以解释调查结果并确定可转移的因素。根据行为和强度,共确定了714个现实生活中的HEPA倡议并进行了分类。其中,有390个项目由17位国际专家根据预先确定的标准(包括按公司规模的可行性)进行评估。世卫组织欧洲区域没有达成倡议层面的共识。小组成员确定了可转移的特征(最常见的是活跃生活和锻炼/健身领域),并强调适应性、低门槛方法和企业规模作为指标。本研究使用基于delphi的共识过程,对中小企业可行的工作场所HEPA计划进行了结构化分析。研究结果为开发适合欧洲中小企业需求和能力的实用工具提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书