The ACEF II scoring model in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A single centre validation study.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Selen Öztürk
{"title":"The ACEF II scoring model in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A single centre validation study.","authors":"Selen Öztürk","doi":"10.5830/CVJA-2025-092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Estimating the mortality rate of patients after cardiac surgery is an important issue in clinical practice. The age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score is one of those scoring models developed for this purpose.We aimed to validate themortality scoringmodel,ACEF II (age, creatinine, ejection fraction, hematocrit, and emergency of the surgery), in the patient population undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with coronary artery disease who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were retrospectively analysed. Data from January 2022 to December 2022 are included. ACEF II scoring model points were calculated. The efficacy of this model in predicting 30-day mortality was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>429 patients were included in the analysis. One-month mortality was 6.1% (n = 26). There was a statistically significant difference in terms of age, ejection fraction, heart failure, creatinine, hematocrit, ACEF scores, status of operation (elective/emergency), and cardiopulmonary bypass time. (p = 0.001; p < 0.01). The cut-off value of the ACEF II score and area under the ROC curve were, respectively, 4.2 and 0.992. The risk of mortality in cases with an ACEF II score above 4.2 was found to be 2.238 (95% CI: 1.628-3.076) times higher. In multivariate Logistic regression analysis, ACEF II Score and heart failure were significant risk factors (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We concluded that the ACEF II score and heart failure were independent risk factors for mortality. ACEF II has a good ability to discriminate for predicting mortality in the cardiac surgical population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9434,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Journal of Africa","volume":"37 1","pages":"27-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Journal of Africa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2025-092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Estimating the mortality rate of patients after cardiac surgery is an important issue in clinical practice. The age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score is one of those scoring models developed for this purpose.We aimed to validate themortality scoringmodel,ACEF II (age, creatinine, ejection fraction, hematocrit, and emergency of the surgery), in the patient population undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

Methods: Patients with coronary artery disease who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were retrospectively analysed. Data from January 2022 to December 2022 are included. ACEF II scoring model points were calculated. The efficacy of this model in predicting 30-day mortality was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results: 429 patients were included in the analysis. One-month mortality was 6.1% (n = 26). There was a statistically significant difference in terms of age, ejection fraction, heart failure, creatinine, hematocrit, ACEF scores, status of operation (elective/emergency), and cardiopulmonary bypass time. (p = 0.001; p < 0.01). The cut-off value of the ACEF II score and area under the ROC curve were, respectively, 4.2 and 0.992. The risk of mortality in cases with an ACEF II score above 4.2 was found to be 2.238 (95% CI: 1.628-3.076) times higher. In multivariate Logistic regression analysis, ACEF II Score and heart failure were significant risk factors (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: We concluded that the ACEF II score and heart failure were independent risk factors for mortality. ACEF II has a good ability to discriminate for predicting mortality in the cardiac surgical population.

孤立冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的ACEF II评分模型:单中心验证研究
心脏手术后患者死亡率的估计是临床实践中的一个重要问题。年龄、肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分是为此目的开发的评分模型之一。我们的目的是验证死亡率评分模型ACEF II(年龄、肌酐、射血分数、红细胞压积和手术紧急程度)在接受孤立冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者群体中的有效性。方法:回顾性分析行冠状动脉旁路移植术的冠心病患者。包括2022年1月至2022年12月的数据。计算ACEF II评分模型积分。该模型预测30天死亡率的效果由受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定。结果:429例患者纳入分析。1个月死亡率为6.1% (n = 26)。在年龄、射血分数、心力衰竭、肌酐、红细胞压积、ACEF评分、手术状态(择期/急诊)和体外循环时间方面有统计学意义的差异。(p = 0.001; p < 0.01)。ACEFⅱ评分和ROC曲线下面积的截断值分别为4.2和0.992。ACEF II评分高于4.2的患者死亡风险高出2.238倍(95% CI: 1.628-3.076)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,ACEF评分和心力衰竭是显著危险因素(p < 0.05)。结论:我们的结论是,ACEF II评分和心力衰竭是死亡率的独立危险因素。ACEFⅱ在预测心脏外科人群死亡率方面具有良好的判别能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Journal of Africa
Cardiovascular Journal of Africa CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cardiovascular Journal of Africa (CVJA) is an international peer-reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include coronary disease, electrophysiology, valve disease, imaging techniques, congenital heart disease (fetal, paediatric and adult), heart failure, surgery, and basic science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书