The influence of cultural repertoire metaphors on a specific peer group's romantic relationships

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Peyman Ahmadi
{"title":"The influence of cultural repertoire metaphors on a specific peer group's romantic relationships","authors":"Peyman Ahmadi","doi":"10.1111/anhu.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>What does it mean to love, and to be loved, in a world shaped by both mystical metaphors and modern individualism? This article presents a narrative ethnography of a friendship network of Iranian youth (the “Hejrat” group), with whom the author lived and participated between 2018 and 2022. It identifies two dominant affective orientations: one where love is considered part of life, and another where life itself is lived for love. These shifting repertoires activate under pressures of family, law, class, and gender. They are shaped by contrasting cultural grammars: mystical-poetic traditions that emphasize longing, sacrifice, and transcendence, and contemporary frameworks grounded in autonomy, equality, and mutual respect. The analysis traces how metaphors from Persian Sufi literature—such as <i>talab</i> (longing) or <i>feraq</i> (separation)—continue to structure emotional lives, often producing intense but fragile attachments. In contrast, more secular repertoires enable the cultivation of dialogic and resilient relationships. The article argues that romantic love is not merely a private experience but a moral practice where cultural metaphors, ethical selves, and existential stakes converge. It contributes to debates in the anthropology of emotion, love, and embodiment by showing how literary traditions, social conditions, and everyday life co-construct affective subjectivities.</p>","PeriodicalId":53597,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Humanism","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Humanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anhu.70090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What does it mean to love, and to be loved, in a world shaped by both mystical metaphors and modern individualism? This article presents a narrative ethnography of a friendship network of Iranian youth (the “Hejrat” group), with whom the author lived and participated between 2018 and 2022. It identifies two dominant affective orientations: one where love is considered part of life, and another where life itself is lived for love. These shifting repertoires activate under pressures of family, law, class, and gender. They are shaped by contrasting cultural grammars: mystical-poetic traditions that emphasize longing, sacrifice, and transcendence, and contemporary frameworks grounded in autonomy, equality, and mutual respect. The analysis traces how metaphors from Persian Sufi literature—such as talab (longing) or feraq (separation)—continue to structure emotional lives, often producing intense but fragile attachments. In contrast, more secular repertoires enable the cultivation of dialogic and resilient relationships. The article argues that romantic love is not merely a private experience but a moral practice where cultural metaphors, ethical selves, and existential stakes converge. It contributes to debates in the anthropology of emotion, love, and embodiment by showing how literary traditions, social conditions, and everyday life co-construct affective subjectivities.

文化剧目隐喻对特定同伴群体恋爱关系的影响
在一个由神秘隐喻和现代个人主义共同塑造的世界里,爱和被爱意味着什么?本文介绍了伊朗青年(“Hejrat”群体)的友谊网络的叙事民族志,作者在2018年至2022年期间与他们生活和参与。它确定了两种主要的情感取向:一种认为爱是生活的一部分,另一种认为生活本身就是为爱而活。在家庭、法律、阶级和性别的压力下,这些不断变化的技能得以激活。它们是由截然不同的文化语法形成的:强调渴望、牺牲和超越的神秘诗歌传统,以及以自主、平等和相互尊重为基础的当代框架。分析追踪了来自波斯苏非文学的隐喻——如talab(渴望)或feraq(分离)——如何继续构建情感生活,经常产生强烈而脆弱的依恋。相比之下,更世俗的剧目能够培养对话和有弹性的关系。这篇文章认为,浪漫的爱情不仅是一种私人体验,而且是一种道德实践,其中文化隐喻、伦理自我和存在风险汇聚在一起。它通过展示文学传统、社会条件和日常生活如何共同构建情感主体性,为情感、爱和体现的人类学辩论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anthropology and Humanism
Anthropology and Humanism Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书