Management of bladder pain syndrome with Hunner's lesions: A series of 32 cases.

IF 1.2
The French journal of urology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103149
Christian Saussine, Victor Gaillard
{"title":"Management of bladder pain syndrome with Hunner's lesions: A series of 32 cases.","authors":"Christian Saussine, Victor Gaillard","doi":"10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The recommendations of the European association of urology (EAU) suggests treating the bladder phenotype with Hunner's lesion (HL) associated with bladder pain syndrome (BPS) by transurethral resection (TUR) or coagulation of the lesions. We present the results of this approach in our practice.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Retrospective monocentric study including consecutive patients presenting BPS with HL assessed during cystoscopy between 1998 and 2026. Patients were divided in two groups according to treatment strategy: group 1 with medical management (association of cimetidine or bladder instillations of RIMSO or pentosan polysulfate de sodium [CRP]) and group 2 with surgical management (immediate TUR, repeated if pain and HL recurrence). The primary objective was to compare success of each management strategy, defined by complete resolution of pain. Secondary objectives were to describe efficacy on pollakiuria symptoms and morbidity of surgical management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients were included (group 1 n=9, group 2 n=23). Success of treatment was achieved in 11.1% (1/9) cases in group 1 and in 78.2% (18/23) cases in group 2 (P=0.001). In group 1, the only pain resolution was observed after RIMSO bladder instillation. In group 2, 61.1% (11/18) experienced a pain recurrence after being cured with a median delay of 13 [6-30.25] months. Twelve patients required a 2nd TUR. Resolution of pollakiuria occurred in 0% in group 1 and 34.8% (8/23) in group 2 (P=0.07). Three patients required reintervention after TUR, 2 for bladder perforation (1 open and 1 laparoscopic bladder repair), 1 for gross haematuria requiring coagulation and 12.5% (4/32) patients ultimately underwent cystectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In case of BPS with a bladder phenotype and one or more Hunner's lesions, treatment by transurethral resection of the inflammatory lesion is more effective for pain and, to a lesser extent, for pollakiuria than our usual medical treatment (CRP) but does not prevent recurrence after varying periods of time.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 5: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":516865,"journal":{"name":"The French journal of urology","volume":" ","pages":"103149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The French journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The recommendations of the European association of urology (EAU) suggests treating the bladder phenotype with Hunner's lesion (HL) associated with bladder pain syndrome (BPS) by transurethral resection (TUR) or coagulation of the lesions. We present the results of this approach in our practice.

Materials: Retrospective monocentric study including consecutive patients presenting BPS with HL assessed during cystoscopy between 1998 and 2026. Patients were divided in two groups according to treatment strategy: group 1 with medical management (association of cimetidine or bladder instillations of RIMSO or pentosan polysulfate de sodium [CRP]) and group 2 with surgical management (immediate TUR, repeated if pain and HL recurrence). The primary objective was to compare success of each management strategy, defined by complete resolution of pain. Secondary objectives were to describe efficacy on pollakiuria symptoms and morbidity of surgical management.

Results: Thirty-two patients were included (group 1 n=9, group 2 n=23). Success of treatment was achieved in 11.1% (1/9) cases in group 1 and in 78.2% (18/23) cases in group 2 (P=0.001). In group 1, the only pain resolution was observed after RIMSO bladder instillation. In group 2, 61.1% (11/18) experienced a pain recurrence after being cured with a median delay of 13 [6-30.25] months. Twelve patients required a 2nd TUR. Resolution of pollakiuria occurred in 0% in group 1 and 34.8% (8/23) in group 2 (P=0.07). Three patients required reintervention after TUR, 2 for bladder perforation (1 open and 1 laparoscopic bladder repair), 1 for gross haematuria requiring coagulation and 12.5% (4/32) patients ultimately underwent cystectomy.

Conclusion: In case of BPS with a bladder phenotype and one or more Hunner's lesions, treatment by transurethral resection of the inflammatory lesion is more effective for pain and, to a lesser extent, for pollakiuria than our usual medical treatment (CRP) but does not prevent recurrence after varying periods of time.

Level of evidence: 5:

32例伴有Hunner病变的膀胱疼痛综合征的治疗。
简介:欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)建议通过经尿道切除术(TUR)或病变凝血治疗伴有膀胱疼痛综合征(BPS)的Hunner病变(HL)的膀胱表型。我们在实践中展示了这种方法的结果。资料:回顾性单中心研究,包括1998年至2026年膀胱镜检查期间连续出现BPS合并HL的患者。根据治疗策略将患者分为两组:1组采用内科治疗(联合西咪替丁或膀胱内滴注RIMSO或聚硫酸戊聚糖钠(CRP)); 2组采用外科治疗(立即TUR,如果疼痛和HL复发则重复)。主要目的是比较每一种管理策略的成功,定义为完全解决疼痛。次要目的是描述对pollakuria症状的疗效和手术处理的发病率。结果:共纳入32例患者,组1 n=9,组2 n=23。1组治疗成功率为11.1%(1/9),2组治疗成功率为78.2% (18/23)(p=0.001)。在第一组中,只有RIMSO膀胱灌注后疼痛得到缓解。在第2组,61%(11/18)患者在治愈后疼痛复发,中位延迟时间为13[6-30.25]个月。12例患者需要第二次TUR。1组清除率为0%,2组清除率为34.8% (8/23)(p=0.07)。3例患者在TUR后需要再次干预,2例为膀胱穿孔(1例为开放膀胱修复,1例为腹腔镜膀胱修复),1例为肉眼血尿需要凝血,12.5%(4/32)患者最终接受膀胱切除术。结论:在伴有膀胱表型和一个或多个Hunner病变的BPS病例中,经尿道炎性病变切除术治疗疼痛更有效,在较小程度上比我们通常的药物治疗(CRP)更有效,但不能预防不同时间后的复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书