[Videolaryngoscopic endotracheal intubation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from the perspective of paramedics : Training requirements and subjective procedural confidence-results of an anonymous cross-sectional survey].
Julia J Grannemann, Berrin Winkler, Bernd Strickmann, Gerrit Jansen
{"title":"[Videolaryngoscopic endotracheal intubation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from the perspective of paramedics : Training requirements and subjective procedural confidence-results of an anonymous cross-sectional survey].","authors":"Julia J Grannemann, Berrin Winkler, Bernd Strickmann, Gerrit Jansen","doi":"10.1007/s00063-026-01469-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Videolaryngoscopic endotracheal intubation (VL<sub>ETI</sub>) was implemented as a structured training module for paramedics as part of an annual continuing education program in a German EMS system. The aim was not to evaluate intubation success rates, but rather to assess perceived training needs and subjective confidence in the application of the technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online cross-sectional survey was conducted among participants of the 2025 training program. Only datasets from paramedics were included in the analysis. Subjective confidence in five airway management techniques was ranked using a Borda score (rank 1 = 5 points, rank 5 = 1 point).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine paramedics participated (62.7%). The iGel® achieved 336 of a maximum of 395 points. Macintosh-like VL<sub>ETI</sub> with stylet and with bougie each reached 256 points. Hyperangulated techniques scored considerably lower (171 and 166 points). About half of the participants reported a need for more frequent training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although VL<sub>ETI</sub> was generally well accepted, its perceived safety remained lower than that of supraglottic airway devices. These findings support structured, repeated, and quality-assured training approaches rather than an uncontrolled expansion of invasive airway techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-026-01469-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Videolaryngoscopic endotracheal intubation (VLETI) was implemented as a structured training module for paramedics as part of an annual continuing education program in a German EMS system. The aim was not to evaluate intubation success rates, but rather to assess perceived training needs and subjective confidence in the application of the technique.
Methods: An anonymous online cross-sectional survey was conducted among participants of the 2025 training program. Only datasets from paramedics were included in the analysis. Subjective confidence in five airway management techniques was ranked using a Borda score (rank 1 = 5 points, rank 5 = 1 point).
Results: Seventy-nine paramedics participated (62.7%). The iGel® achieved 336 of a maximum of 395 points. Macintosh-like VLETI with stylet and with bougie each reached 256 points. Hyperangulated techniques scored considerably lower (171 and 166 points). About half of the participants reported a need for more frequent training.
Conclusions: Although VLETI was generally well accepted, its perceived safety remained lower than that of supraglottic airway devices. These findings support structured, repeated, and quality-assured training approaches rather than an uncontrolled expansion of invasive airway techniques.
期刊介绍:
Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine.
Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.