Characterizing emergency clinician engagement with social drivers of health data among patients with opioid use disorder.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Melanie F Molina, Samuel D Pimentel, Cynthia Fenton, Julia Adler-Milstein, Laura M Gottlieb
{"title":"Characterizing emergency clinician engagement with social drivers of health data among patients with opioid use disorder.","authors":"Melanie F Molina, Samuel D Pimentel, Cynthia Fenton, Julia Adler-Milstein, Laura M Gottlieb","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocag093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize emergency department (ED) clinician engagement with electronic health record (EHR)-based social drivers of health (SDOH) data; test whether engagement differs in encounters with opioid use disorder (OUD); and, among OUD encounters, assess whether engagement is associated with medications for OUD (MOUD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study of adult ED encounters (January 2023-October 2024). OUD encounters, identified with a structured phenotype, were matched (1:2) to non-OUD encounters. Audit logs captured clinician engagement with structured SDOH questions (\"SDOH Wheel\"), ICD-10 Z codes in the Problem List, Social History free text, and social work notes. Engagement was any SDOH documentation or review of preexisting SDOH data during the encounter. Logistic regression estimated associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 17 103 encounters (5701 OUD; 11 402 non-OUD), clinician SDOH documentation was rare (<1%). Clinicians most often reviewed the SDOH Wheel (1103/3953; 27.9%), followed by social work notes (1711/10 670; 16.0%), Z codes (29/620; 4.7%), and Social History free text (232/6942; 3.3%). Engagement occurred in 17.1% of encounters and was higher with OUD (23.1% vs 14.1%; OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.70-2.00). Among OUD encounters, engagement was not associated with MOUD (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.95-1.70); however, MOUD treatment varied by race and ethnicity, reflecting persistent disparities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ED clinicians infrequently documented and favored review of structured, accessible SDOH data. Engagement increased in OUD encounters yet neither predicted MOUD nor mitigated racial and ethnic treatment disparities. EHR interfaces that surface SDOH data, coupled with targeted decision supports, might influence equitable, time-sensitive ED care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":"1693-1701"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13580726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocag093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize emergency department (ED) clinician engagement with electronic health record (EHR)-based social drivers of health (SDOH) data; test whether engagement differs in encounters with opioid use disorder (OUD); and, among OUD encounters, assess whether engagement is associated with medications for OUD (MOUD).

Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adult ED encounters (January 2023-October 2024). OUD encounters, identified with a structured phenotype, were matched (1:2) to non-OUD encounters. Audit logs captured clinician engagement with structured SDOH questions ("SDOH Wheel"), ICD-10 Z codes in the Problem List, Social History free text, and social work notes. Engagement was any SDOH documentation or review of preexisting SDOH data during the encounter. Logistic regression estimated associations.

Results: Among 17 103 encounters (5701 OUD; 11 402 non-OUD), clinician SDOH documentation was rare (<1%). Clinicians most often reviewed the SDOH Wheel (1103/3953; 27.9%), followed by social work notes (1711/10 670; 16.0%), Z codes (29/620; 4.7%), and Social History free text (232/6942; 3.3%). Engagement occurred in 17.1% of encounters and was higher with OUD (23.1% vs 14.1%; OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.70-2.00). Among OUD encounters, engagement was not associated with MOUD (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.95-1.70); however, MOUD treatment varied by race and ethnicity, reflecting persistent disparities.

Discussion: ED clinicians infrequently documented and favored review of structured, accessible SDOH data. Engagement increased in OUD encounters yet neither predicted MOUD nor mitigated racial and ethnic treatment disparities. EHR interfaces that surface SDOH data, coupled with targeted decision supports, might influence equitable, time-sensitive ED care.

表征阿片类药物使用障碍患者健康数据的社会驱动因素急诊临床医生参与。
目的:探讨急诊科(ED)临床医生使用基于电子健康记录(EHR)的健康社会驱动因素(SDOH)数据的特征;测试阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的接触是否不同;并且,在遭遇OUD时,评估参与是否与OUD药物有关。材料和方法:我们对成人ED遭遇进行了横断面研究(2023年1月至2024年10月)。具有结构表型的OUD遭遇与非OUD遭遇匹配(1:2)。审计日志记录了临床医生对结构化SDOH问题(“SDOH轮盘”)、问题清单中的ICD-10 Z代码、社会历史免费文本和社会工作笔记的参与情况。接触是在接触过程中任何SDOH文件或对先前存在的SDOH数据的审查。逻辑回归估计关联。结果:在17103例病例中(5701例OUD; 11402例非OUD),临床医生的SDOH记录很少(讨论:ED临床医生很少记录和倾向于审查结构化的、可访问的SDOH数据。在OUD遭遇中,参与增加了,但既不能预测mod,也不能减轻种族和民族待遇差异。显示SDOH数据的EHR接口,加上有针对性的决策支持,可能会影响公平的、时效性强的急诊科护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书