The Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of Upadacitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Saudi Arabia.

IF 2.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2026-06-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S604093
Nada Abu-Shraie, Afaf Al-Sheikh, Ibtisam Alharbi, Layla Alanizy, Mohammed Alshraim, Sahal I Khoshhal, Sarah A AlSalman, Ali Alrumaih, Ahmad Nader Fasseeh, Baher Elezbawy, Nada Abaza, Amr Semida, Marina George, Shireen Amin, Yousef Binamer
{"title":"The Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of Upadacitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Nada Abu-Shraie, Afaf Al-Sheikh, Ibtisam Alharbi, Layla Alanizy, Mohammed Alshraim, Sahal I Khoshhal, Sarah A AlSalman, Ali Alrumaih, Ahmad Nader Fasseeh, Baher Elezbawy, Nada Abaza, Amr Semida, Marina George, Shireen Amin, Yousef Binamer","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S604093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent dermatological disease in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of upadacitinib in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 1-year decision tree model followed by a lifetime Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of upadacitinib compared to dupilumab and other novel AD treatments in moderate-to-severe AD patients aged ≥12 years in Saudi Arabia from the public payer perspective. In addition, we developed a 5-year budget impact model to estimate the financial consequences of increasing the market share of upadacitinib. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the model's robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a lifetime horizon, upadacitinib 15 mg was associated with 0.21 additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lower costs by 148,068 SAR (39,484 USD) compared with dupilumab 300 mg. The net monetary benefit of upadacitinib 15 mg versus dupilumab 300 mg was 158,656 SAR (42,308 USD). For the budget impact, increasing the market share of upadacitinib over 5 years was associated with estimated savings of 1.5 billion SAR (412 million USD). Sensitivity analyses results supported the direction of the base-case findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upadacitinib may be a cost-effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in Saudi Arabia. Increasing its market share could be considered for the target population and may reduce public healthcare costs over 5 years. However, these model-based estimates should be interpreted with uncertainty due to input assumptions and local data limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"604093"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13271258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S604093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent dermatological disease in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of upadacitinib in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: A 1-year decision tree model followed by a lifetime Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of upadacitinib compared to dupilumab and other novel AD treatments in moderate-to-severe AD patients aged ≥12 years in Saudi Arabia from the public payer perspective. In addition, we developed a 5-year budget impact model to estimate the financial consequences of increasing the market share of upadacitinib. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the model's robustness.

Results: Over a lifetime horizon, upadacitinib 15 mg was associated with 0.21 additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lower costs by 148,068 SAR (39,484 USD) compared with dupilumab 300 mg. The net monetary benefit of upadacitinib 15 mg versus dupilumab 300 mg was 158,656 SAR (42,308 USD). For the budget impact, increasing the market share of upadacitinib over 5 years was associated with estimated savings of 1.5 billion SAR (412 million USD). Sensitivity analyses results supported the direction of the base-case findings.

Conclusion: Upadacitinib may be a cost-effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in Saudi Arabia. Increasing its market share could be considered for the target population and may reduce public healthcare costs over 5 years. However, these model-based estimates should be interpreted with uncertainty due to input assumptions and local data limitations.

沙特阿拉伯Upadacitinib治疗中重度特应性皮炎的成本-效果和预算影响分析
目的:特应性皮炎(AD)是沙特阿拉伯的一种常见皮肤病。本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯成人和青少年中重度AD患者upadacitinib的成本效益和预算影响。方法:建立1年决策树模型,然后建立终身马尔可夫模型,从公共付款人的角度评估upadacitinib与dupilumab和其他新型AD治疗在沙特阿拉伯≥12岁中重度AD患者中的成本-效果。此外,我们开发了一个5年预算影响模型来估计增加upadacitinib市场份额的财务后果。进行了概率和确定性敏感性分析,以检验模型的稳健性。结果:与dupilumab 300 mg相比,upadacitinib 15 mg与0.21个额外的质量调整生命年(QALYs)相关,成本降低148,068 SAR(39,484美元)。upadacitinib 15mg与dupilumab 300 mg的净经济效益为158,656 SAR(42,308美元)。在预算影响方面,在5年内增加upadacitinib的市场份额预计可节省15亿里亚尔(4.12亿美元)。敏感性分析结果支持基本病例结果的方向。结论:在沙特阿拉伯,Upadacitinib可能是一种具有成本效益的治疗中重度AD的方法。可以考虑为目标人群增加其市场份额,并可能在5年内降低公共医疗保健成本。然而,由于输入假设和局部数据限制,这些基于模型的估计应具有不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书