Implementing patient- and family-centered rounds training with direct-observation assessment for medical students in the United States: a prospective feasibility study.

IF 5.5 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Emily Xiao, Erin Chen, Amit Pahwa
{"title":"Implementing patient- and family-centered rounds training with direct-observation assessment for medical students in the United States: a prospective feasibility study.","authors":"Emily Xiao, Erin Chen, Amit Pahwa","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2026.23.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the implementation of a patient- and family-centered rounds (PFCR) educational intervention and a standardized assessment form developed to assess changes in medical students' PFCR performance over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2023 to October 2024, medical students at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine attended a 1-hour PFCR simulation workshop during the Core Clerkship in Pediatrics. Students rotating at the main campus were assessed during rounds with a formative standardized form; all students received summative oral presentation and family rapport scores regardless of site. Performance was compared between students rotating in the first half (H1) and second half (H2) of the clerkship using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with Holm correction for multiple comparisons. Linear mixed-effects models with student-level random intercepts were used to estimate changes across serial assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 74 students rotating at the main campus, assessment forms were completed for 61% of students, with a median of 3 completed forms per student. H1 and H2 students had similar scores on both the formative assessment form and summative evaluations. Both groups improved significantly in inviting patient and family concerns across serial assessments. Summative scores did not differ between students evaluated before and after the educational intervention or between students at the main campus and those at community hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A structured PFCR educational session paired with a standardized assessment form was feasible to implement in a pediatric clerkship. Observed student-level median scores were at or above \"meets expectations\" across 6 PFCR domains, and no significant performance decline was observed among students rotating later in the clerkship. Further controlled studies are needed to determine whether this intervention improves PFCR skills compared with usual training.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"23 ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13473693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2026.23.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the implementation of a patient- and family-centered rounds (PFCR) educational intervention and a standardized assessment form developed to assess changes in medical students' PFCR performance over time.

Methods: From October 2023 to October 2024, medical students at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine attended a 1-hour PFCR simulation workshop during the Core Clerkship in Pediatrics. Students rotating at the main campus were assessed during rounds with a formative standardized form; all students received summative oral presentation and family rapport scores regardless of site. Performance was compared between students rotating in the first half (H1) and second half (H2) of the clerkship using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with Holm correction for multiple comparisons. Linear mixed-effects models with student-level random intercepts were used to estimate changes across serial assessments.

Results: Among the 74 students rotating at the main campus, assessment forms were completed for 61% of students, with a median of 3 completed forms per student. H1 and H2 students had similar scores on both the formative assessment form and summative evaluations. Both groups improved significantly in inviting patient and family concerns across serial assessments. Summative scores did not differ between students evaluated before and after the educational intervention or between students at the main campus and those at community hospitals.

Conclusion: A structured PFCR educational session paired with a standardized assessment form was feasible to implement in a pediatric clerkship. Observed student-level median scores were at or above "meets expectations" across 6 PFCR domains, and no significant performance decline was observed among students rotating later in the clerkship. Further controlled studies are needed to determine whether this intervention improves PFCR skills compared with usual training.

对美国医学生实施以患者和家庭为中心的直接观察评估的查房训练:一项前瞻性可行性研究
目的:本研究评估了以患者和家庭为中心的查房(PFCR)教育干预的实施情况,并开发了一种标准化的评估表格,以评估医学生PFCR表现随时间的变化。方法:2023年10月至2024年10月,约翰霍普金斯医学院的医学生在儿科学核心见习期间参加了1小时的PFCR模拟研讨会。在主校区轮转的学生在轮转期间接受了形成性标准化形式的评估;无论地点如何,所有学生都获得了总结性口头陈述和家庭关系得分。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验和Holm多重比较校正,比较了在实习的上半年(H1)和下半年(H2)轮换的学生之间的表现。使用具有学生水平随机截距的线性混合效应模型来估计一系列评估的变化。结果:在主校区轮转的74名学生中,61%的学生完成了评估表格,平均每人完成了3份表格。H1和H2学生在形成性评价和总结性评价上得分相近。在一系列评估中,两组在邀请患者和家属关注方面都有显著改善。总结性得分在教育干预前后、主校区学生与社区医院学生之间无显著差异。结论:在儿科实习中,采用结构化的PFCR教育课程和标准化的评估表格是可行的。观察到的学生水平的中位数分数在6个PFCR领域中达到或高于“满足预期”,并且在后来轮岗的学生中没有观察到明显的表现下降。需要进一步的对照研究来确定与常规训练相比,这种干预是否能提高PFCR技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions aims to provide readers the state-of-the art practical information on the educational evaluation for health professions so that to increase the quality of undergraduate, graduate, and continuing education. It is specialized in educational evaluation including adoption of measurement theory to medical health education, promotion of high stakes examination such as national licensing examinations, improvement of nationwide or international programs of education, computer-based testing, computerized adaptive testing, and medical health regulatory bodies. Its field comprises a variety of professions that address public medical health as following but not limited to: Care workers Dental hygienists Dental technicians Dentists Dietitians Emergency medical technicians Health educators Medical record technicians Medical technologists Midwives Nurses Nursing aides Occupational therapists Opticians Oriental medical doctors Oriental medicine dispensers Oriental pharmacists Pharmacists Physical therapists Physicians Prosthetists and Orthotists Radiological technologists Rehabilitation counselor Sanitary technicians Speech-language therapists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书