Dissociating hepatocellular necrosis from hepatic encephalopathy: a murine acetaminophen model to identify second-hit drivers of acute liver failure.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-17 DOI:10.1080/15376516.2026.2686724
Jenna Strickland, Yining Jin, Cheryl E Rockwell, Anne M Dorrance, Bryan L Copple
{"title":"Dissociating hepatocellular necrosis from hepatic encephalopathy: a murine acetaminophen model to identify second-hit drivers of acute liver failure.","authors":"Jenna Strickland, Yining Jin, Cheryl E Rockwell, Anne M Dorrance, Bryan L Copple","doi":"10.1080/15376516.2026.2686724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acetaminophen (i.e. paracetamol; APAP) overdose is the most common cause of acute liver injury in the United States, yet outcomes range from recovery to acute liver failure (ALF), defined by coagulopathy and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Clinical decision-making is difficult because routine indices of hepatocellular injury (e.g. ALT/AST) do not reliably predict which patients will recover versus progress to ALF. This underscores the need to define mechanisms that drive progression to ALF and to discover biomarkers that better predict clinical trajectory. A major barrier is the lack of an experimentally tractable model in which severe hepatocellular injury is comparable, but neurological outcome diverges-a defining feature of human APAP toxicity. To address this, we established APAP dosing conditions in mice that produce similar peak liver injury yet distinct clinical courses. Mice treated with 300 mg/kg or 500 mg/kg APAP exhibited comparable increases in ALT and hepatic necrosis. In contrast, only 500 mg/kg APAP caused robust neurological dysfunction consistent with HE, including impaired reflex integrity and motor coordination, accompanied by cerebral edema and reduced cerebral blood flow. Hyperammonemia is widely implicated in HE, but ammonia levels do not always track with HE severity in patients, suggesting additional cooperating factors. Consistent with this clinical discordance, blood ammonia increased to a similar extent in both dosing groups despite clear divergence in neurological impairment. Together, these findings establish a patient-relevant platform that dissociates hepatocellular necrosis (and hyperammonemia) from HE, enabling identification of mediators that drive neurovascular dysfunction and the transition from severe liver injury to ALF.</p>","PeriodicalId":23177,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","volume":" ","pages":"1400-1407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2026.2686724","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acetaminophen (i.e. paracetamol; APAP) overdose is the most common cause of acute liver injury in the United States, yet outcomes range from recovery to acute liver failure (ALF), defined by coagulopathy and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Clinical decision-making is difficult because routine indices of hepatocellular injury (e.g. ALT/AST) do not reliably predict which patients will recover versus progress to ALF. This underscores the need to define mechanisms that drive progression to ALF and to discover biomarkers that better predict clinical trajectory. A major barrier is the lack of an experimentally tractable model in which severe hepatocellular injury is comparable, but neurological outcome diverges-a defining feature of human APAP toxicity. To address this, we established APAP dosing conditions in mice that produce similar peak liver injury yet distinct clinical courses. Mice treated with 300 mg/kg or 500 mg/kg APAP exhibited comparable increases in ALT and hepatic necrosis. In contrast, only 500 mg/kg APAP caused robust neurological dysfunction consistent with HE, including impaired reflex integrity and motor coordination, accompanied by cerebral edema and reduced cerebral blood flow. Hyperammonemia is widely implicated in HE, but ammonia levels do not always track with HE severity in patients, suggesting additional cooperating factors. Consistent with this clinical discordance, blood ammonia increased to a similar extent in both dosing groups despite clear divergence in neurological impairment. Together, these findings establish a patient-relevant platform that dissociates hepatocellular necrosis (and hyperammonemia) from HE, enabling identification of mediators that drive neurovascular dysfunction and the transition from severe liver injury to ALF.

分离肝细胞坏死与肝性脑病:小鼠对乙酰氨基酚模型,以确定急性肝衰竭的二次打击驱动因素。
在美国,对乙酰氨基酚(即扑热息痛;APAP)过量是急性肝损伤的最常见原因,但结果从恢复到急性肝衰竭(ALF)不等,由凝血功能障碍和肝性脑病(HE)定义。临床决策是困难的,因为肝细胞损伤的常规指标(如ALT/AST)不能可靠地预测哪些患者将恢复或进展为ALF。这强调了确定ALF进展机制和发现更好地预测临床轨迹的生物标志物的必要性。一个主要的障碍是缺乏一种实验上可处理的模型,在这种模型中,严重的肝细胞损伤是可比的,但神经系统的结果是不同的——这是人类APAP毒性的一个决定性特征。为了解决这个问题,我们在小鼠中建立了APAP给药条件,这些小鼠产生相似的肝损伤峰值,但临床过程不同。300 mg/kg或500 mg/kg APAP处理的小鼠ALT和肝坏死均有相当程度的增加。相比之下,仅500 mg/kg APAP就会引起与HE一致的强烈神经功能障碍,包括反射完整性和运动协调性受损,并伴有脑水肿和脑血流量减少。高氨血症与HE有广泛的关系,但氨水平并不总是与患者的HE严重程度相关,这表明有其他的协同因素。与这种临床差异一致的是,尽管在神经损伤方面存在明显差异,但两组血氨升高的程度相似。总之,这些发现建立了一个与患者相关的平台,将肝细胞坏死(和高氨血症)从HE中分离出来,从而能够识别驱动神经血管功能障碍和从严重肝损伤向ALF过渡的介质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods is a peer-reviewed journal whose aim is twofold. Firstly, the journal contains original research on subjects dealing with the mechanisms by which foreign chemicals cause toxic tissue injury. Chemical substances of interest include industrial compounds, environmental pollutants, hazardous wastes, drugs, pesticides, and chemical warfare agents. The scope of the journal spans from molecular and cellular mechanisms of action to the consideration of mechanistic evidence in establishing regulatory policy. Secondly, the journal addresses aspects of the development, validation, and application of new and existing laboratory methods, techniques, and equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书