Mapping power in community engagement: methodological reflections from health emergencies.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Luisa Enria, Giulia Loffreda, Angus F Tengbeh, Abass S Kamara, Alie D Timbo, Karin Diaconu, Sophie Witter
{"title":"Mapping power in community engagement: methodological reflections from health emergencies.","authors":"Luisa Enria, Giulia Loffreda, Angus F Tengbeh, Abass S Kamara, Alie D Timbo, Karin Diaconu, Sophie Witter","doi":"10.1186/s12874-026-02905-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community engagement is increasingly seen as a key component of public health responses to health emergencies. Recent outbreaks, from Ebola in West Africa to COVID-19 across the world, have highlighted the importance of working through existing structures and identifying trusted local leaders who can help response workers design context-appropriate interventions. However, community engagement efforts often rely on homogenous understandings of 'community' that underestimate the significance of power. This creates a risk of exclusionary practices. In this article, we discuss the use of participatory power mapping workshops as a useful method to identify who has authority and who is trusted by whom, and consider its implications for how we think about trust-building during emergencies. We detail the implementation of this method using participatory workshops conducted in Sierra Leone. We show how these workshops provided granular insights on authority structures and the relationship between power and trust. These discussions highlighted that trust is not homogeneous nor static, and helped kickstart conversations about the role of citizens not simply as recipients of health interventions but also as active participants in how health interventions are designed and delivered. Tracing power dynamics with and within communities can help develop allows us to make power visible in health interventions, maintaining a critical lens on how interventions themselves intervene dynamically on its distribution. In practice, a systematic application of this methodology can encourage more diversified community engagement efforts, and potentially set the foundations for citizen-led collective action around health emergency resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13471247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-026-02905-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community engagement is increasingly seen as a key component of public health responses to health emergencies. Recent outbreaks, from Ebola in West Africa to COVID-19 across the world, have highlighted the importance of working through existing structures and identifying trusted local leaders who can help response workers design context-appropriate interventions. However, community engagement efforts often rely on homogenous understandings of 'community' that underestimate the significance of power. This creates a risk of exclusionary practices. In this article, we discuss the use of participatory power mapping workshops as a useful method to identify who has authority and who is trusted by whom, and consider its implications for how we think about trust-building during emergencies. We detail the implementation of this method using participatory workshops conducted in Sierra Leone. We show how these workshops provided granular insights on authority structures and the relationship between power and trust. These discussions highlighted that trust is not homogeneous nor static, and helped kickstart conversations about the role of citizens not simply as recipients of health interventions but also as active participants in how health interventions are designed and delivered. Tracing power dynamics with and within communities can help develop allows us to make power visible in health interventions, maintaining a critical lens on how interventions themselves intervene dynamically on its distribution. In practice, a systematic application of this methodology can encourage more diversified community engagement efforts, and potentially set the foundations for citizen-led collective action around health emergency resilience.

社区参与中的制图能力:突发卫生事件的方法反思。
社区参与日益被视为公共卫生应对突发卫生事件的一个关键组成部分。从西非的埃博拉病毒到世界各地的COVID-19,最近的疫情凸显了通过现有结构开展工作并确定可信赖的地方领导人的重要性,这些领导人可以帮助应对工作人员设计适合具体情况的干预措施。然而,社区参与的努力往往依赖于对“社区”的同质化理解,低估了权力的重要性。这就造成了排他性做法的风险。在本文中,我们讨论了参与性权力映射研讨会作为一种有用的方法的使用,以确定谁拥有权力,谁被谁信任,并考虑其对我们如何考虑在紧急情况下建立信任的影响。我们通过在塞拉利昂举办的参与性讲习班详细介绍了这一方法的实施情况。我们展示了这些研讨会如何提供关于权威结构和权力与信任之间关系的详细见解。这些讨论突出表明,信任不是同质的,也不是静止的,并有助于启动关于公民不仅作为卫生干预措施的接受者,而且作为如何设计和提供卫生干预措施的积极参与者的作用的对话。追踪社区内部和社区内部的权力动态有助于发展,使我们能够在卫生干预措施中看到权力,保持对干预措施本身如何动态影响其分配的关键视角。在实践中,系统地应用这一方法可以鼓励更多样化的社区参与努力,并有可能为围绕突发卫生事件复原力开展公民主导的集体行动奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书