Crowding in real-time: an artificial intelligence-based model to manage crowding in the emergency department (CRAMMED Study).

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
E E Schippers, S P Willemsen, L A M Collée, K L M Koenraadt, S Schol-Gelok
{"title":"Crowding in real-time: an artificial intelligence-based model to manage crowding in the emergency department (CRAMMED Study).","authors":"E E Schippers, S P Willemsen, L A M Collée, K L M Koenraadt, S Schol-Gelok","doi":"10.1186/s12873-026-01647-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) crowding is a global challenge with adverse effects on patient outcomes and staff well-being. Traditional crowding scores, such as the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS) score, have limited ability to predict imminent crowding. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a real-time, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven prediction model using a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to predict ED crowding, using ambulance diversion status as the reference standard and comparing performance with the (modified) NEDOCS score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre, retrospective cohort study, we extracted parameters related to crowding from electronic health records and workforce data. Ambulance diversion status served as the reference standard for crowding. The LSTM model was trained and evaluated with walk-forward validation and performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model calibration was assessed using Brier score and expected calibration error (ECE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal LSTM model used the previous hour of data to predict one hour ahead, yielding an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.86). Key features contributing to the predictive quality of our model included the number of pre-notified arrivals, patients in the yellow and orange triage categories, and the number of ED supervisors. Compared with the modified NEDOCS score (AUC of 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.76)), the LSTM model showed higher discriminative performance in internal validation within this single-centre study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our AI-driven prediction model demonstrated good predictive performance for ED crowding in internal validation. These findings highlight the potential of real-time prediction models to support ED clinical workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13520244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01647-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a global challenge with adverse effects on patient outcomes and staff well-being. Traditional crowding scores, such as the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS) score, have limited ability to predict imminent crowding. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a real-time, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven prediction model using a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to predict ED crowding, using ambulance diversion status as the reference standard and comparing performance with the (modified) NEDOCS score.

Methods: In this single-centre, retrospective cohort study, we extracted parameters related to crowding from electronic health records and workforce data. Ambulance diversion status served as the reference standard for crowding. The LSTM model was trained and evaluated with walk-forward validation and performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model calibration was assessed using Brier score and expected calibration error (ECE).

Results: The optimal LSTM model used the previous hour of data to predict one hour ahead, yielding an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.86). Key features contributing to the predictive quality of our model included the number of pre-notified arrivals, patients in the yellow and orange triage categories, and the number of ED supervisors. Compared with the modified NEDOCS score (AUC of 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.76)), the LSTM model showed higher discriminative performance in internal validation within this single-centre study.

Conclusions: Our AI-driven prediction model demonstrated good predictive performance for ED crowding in internal validation. These findings highlight the potential of real-time prediction models to support ED clinical workflow.

实时拥挤:一个基于人工智能的模型来管理急诊科拥挤(挤满研究)。
背景:急诊科(ED)拥挤是一个全球性的挑战,对患者的预后和工作人员的福祉产生不利影响。传统的拥挤评分,如国家ED过度拥挤研究(NEDOCS)评分,预测即将到来的拥挤的能力有限。本研究的目的是开发和验证一个实时的、人工智能(AI)驱动的预测模型,该模型使用长短期记忆(LSTM)神经网络来预测急诊科拥挤,以救护车转移状态作为参考标准,并将其与(修改的)NEDOCS评分进行比较。方法:在这项单中心、回顾性队列研究中,我们从电子健康记录和劳动力数据中提取了与拥挤相关的参数。救护车分流状态作为拥挤的参考标准。LSTM模型采用前向验证法进行训练和评估,并使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估其性能。采用Brier评分和预期校准误差(ECE)评估模型校准。结果:最佳LSTM模型使用前一小时的数据预测未来一小时,AUC为0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.86)。有助于我们模型预测质量的关键特征包括预先通知的到达人数,黄色和橙色分类类别的患者数量,以及急诊科主管的数量。与改进的NEDOCS评分(AUC为0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.76))相比,LSTM模型在单中心研究的内部验证中表现出更高的判别性能。结论:我们的人工智能驱动的预测模型在内部验证中显示出良好的ED拥挤预测性能。这些发现突出了实时预测模型支持急诊科临床工作流程的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书