How Do I Answer This? A Queer Critique of Australian Census Forms and the Reification of Cisheteronormative Families

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Australian Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2026-06-15 Epub Date: 2025-08-12 DOI:10.1002/ajs4.70057
Xavier Mills, Sal Clark
{"title":"How Do I Answer This? A Queer Critique of Australian Census Forms and the Reification of Cisheteronormative Families","authors":"Xavier Mills,&nbsp;Sal Clark","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents a critical examination of Australia's 2021 household, individual and interviewer census forms. Using a form-led analysis, this research scrutinises the underlying cisheteronormative logic that implicitly shapes the Census process, from data collection to distribution of findings. We analyse the normative frameworks that underpin the Census questionnaire, through tools such as straight washing data (re-categorising non-binary individuals into male/female response options), only giving binary response options (e.g., asking “who is your mother, who is your father?”), or making assumptions about sexuality based on the sex of one's partner. Ultimately, we argue that the 2021 Census further marginalises those with diverse genders or sexualities in Australia by strategically limiting their ability to be counted and therefore considered in the policy process and the national allocation of resources. Thus, the Australian Census operates as a regulatory instrument for queerness, favouring specific expressions of sex, gender, sexuality, and intimacy, particularly those aligned with a heterosexual, cisgender, and biologically related nuclear family models. Furthermore, we advocate a future approach that eschews reductive, essentialist notions of sex, gender and sexuality that seeks to homogenise diverse Australians into cisheteronormative categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"61 2","pages":"407-418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70057","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a critical examination of Australia's 2021 household, individual and interviewer census forms. Using a form-led analysis, this research scrutinises the underlying cisheteronormative logic that implicitly shapes the Census process, from data collection to distribution of findings. We analyse the normative frameworks that underpin the Census questionnaire, through tools such as straight washing data (re-categorising non-binary individuals into male/female response options), only giving binary response options (e.g., asking “who is your mother, who is your father?”), or making assumptions about sexuality based on the sex of one's partner. Ultimately, we argue that the 2021 Census further marginalises those with diverse genders or sexualities in Australia by strategically limiting their ability to be counted and therefore considered in the policy process and the national allocation of resources. Thus, the Australian Census operates as a regulatory instrument for queerness, favouring specific expressions of sex, gender, sexuality, and intimacy, particularly those aligned with a heterosexual, cisgender, and biologically related nuclear family models. Furthermore, we advocate a future approach that eschews reductive, essentialist notions of sex, gender and sexuality that seeks to homogenise diverse Australians into cisheteronormative categories.

Abstract Image

我该如何回答这个问题?澳洲人口普查表格的酷儿批判与异性恋规范家庭的物化
本文对澳大利亚2021年的家庭、个人和采访者人口普查表格进行了批判性审查。使用以形式为主导的分析,本研究仔细审查了从数据收集到调查结果分布,隐性影响人口普查过程的潜在的顺异性规范逻辑。我们通过直接清洗数据(将非二元个体重新分类为男性/女性回答选项)等工具,分析支撑人口普查问卷的规范框架,只给出二元回答选项(例如,问“谁是你的母亲,谁是你的父亲?”)),或者根据伴侣的性别对性行为做出假设。最终,我们认为2021年的人口普查通过战略性地限制他们被统计的能力,从而进一步边缘化了澳大利亚不同性别或性取向的人,因此在政策过程和国家资源分配中被考虑在内。因此,澳大利亚人口普查作为酷儿的监管工具,倾向于特定的性、性别、性行为和亲密关系的表达,特别是那些与异性恋、顺性和生物相关的核心家庭模式相一致的表达。此外,我们提倡一种未来的方法,避免简化的、本质主义的性、性别和性的概念,这种概念试图将不同的澳大利亚人同质化为异性恋规范的类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书