Supported Decision-Making Rights in Behaviour Support Policies

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Australian Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2026-06-15 Epub Date: 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1002/ajs4.70070
Sally Robinson, Karen R. Fisher, Julian Laurens, Alinka Fisher, Sabrina Forte, Katrina Reschke, Rosemary Kayess
{"title":"Supported Decision-Making Rights in Behaviour Support Policies","authors":"Sally Robinson,&nbsp;Karen R. Fisher,&nbsp;Julian Laurens,&nbsp;Alinka Fisher,&nbsp;Sabrina Forte,&nbsp;Katrina Reschke,&nbsp;Rosemary Kayess","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Disability policy emphasises that people with disability have the right to exercise their will and preferences in their lives, and decision-making support must be provided to realise this right if they request. One context in which people's will and preferences are often restricted is behaviour support. This article examines whether human rights, including rights to supported decision-making, are reflected in current behaviour support policies—and if not, what can be done to embed these rights. The article integrates the findings from three evidence reviews of policies conducted in Australia about: the right to supported decision-making in behaviour support; the alignment between positive behaviour support (PBS) and supported decision-making in policy; and related resources on supported decision-making. The reviews found that behaviour support policy does not expressly incorporate the concept of ‘rights, will and preferences’ as articulated in article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Principles to inform supported decision-making in PBS are needed to address this gap. The positive examples of online supported decision-making resources identified in the review could assist to operationalise these principles. The findings can inform developments towards embedding rights to supported decision-making in PBS policy and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"61 2","pages":"358-371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disability policy emphasises that people with disability have the right to exercise their will and preferences in their lives, and decision-making support must be provided to realise this right if they request. One context in which people's will and preferences are often restricted is behaviour support. This article examines whether human rights, including rights to supported decision-making, are reflected in current behaviour support policies—and if not, what can be done to embed these rights. The article integrates the findings from three evidence reviews of policies conducted in Australia about: the right to supported decision-making in behaviour support; the alignment between positive behaviour support (PBS) and supported decision-making in policy; and related resources on supported decision-making. The reviews found that behaviour support policy does not expressly incorporate the concept of ‘rights, will and preferences’ as articulated in article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Principles to inform supported decision-making in PBS are needed to address this gap. The positive examples of online supported decision-making resources identified in the review could assist to operationalise these principles. The findings can inform developments towards embedding rights to supported decision-making in PBS policy and practice.

行为支持政策中的支持决策权
残疾政策强调,残疾人有权在生活中行使自己的意愿和偏好,如果他们提出要求,必须提供决策支持,以实现这一权利。人们的意志和偏好经常受到限制的一种情况是行为支持。本文考察了人权,包括辅助决策权,是否反映在当前的行为支持政策中,如果没有,可以做些什么来嵌入这些权利。本文整合了对澳大利亚实施的三项政策的证据审查的结果:行为支持中的支持性决策权;积极行为支持(PBS)与政策支持决策之间的一致性;以及支持决策的相关资源。审查发现,行为支持政策没有明确纳入《残疾人权利公约》(CRPD)第12条所阐述的“权利、意愿和偏好”的概念。为解决这一差距,需要制定公共服务中有信息支持的决策原则。审查中确定的在线支持决策资源的积极例子可以帮助实施这些原则。研究结果可以为将支持决策权纳入公共服务政策和实践的发展提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书