{"title":"Synergizing foam stability, gas mobility control, and oil recovery: A new approach combining silane-silica oxide and MFomax","authors":"Mohammed Falalu Hamza , Hassan Soleimani , Bashir Abubakar Abdulkadir , Saifullahi Shehu Imam , Sabiha Hanim Saleh , Yarima Mudassir Hassan","doi":"10.1016/j.ptlrs.2025.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oil reservoirs subjected to a gas recovery technique are commonly challenged by early gas breakthroughs affecting the production rate. Foam is injected to block and divert gas to reservoir sections, however, achieving this mechanism requires stable foam to withstand extreme reservoir conditions, such as temperature, pressure and salinity. In this work, synergy actions between aminopropyltriethoxysilane doped SiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles (NPs) and MFomax were investigated on rheology, interfacial tension (IFT), wettability, foam stability and quality to reduce gas mobility and enhance oil recovery (EOR). The formulation was guided by optimization, and the foam studies were carried out at optimum concentrations. Core-flood equipment was used to assess the gas mobility reduction factor (MRF) and EOR. From the findings, the foamability of the nanofluid is primarily governed by synergy action between the NPs and MFomax due to significant R<sup>2</sup> value (0.9; p < 0.05). Presence of NPs in the formulation resulted in good fluid properties such viscosity and IFT. The nanofoam stability has improved tremendously to 119% relative to MFomax foam. According to the IFT and contact angle, the detachment energy of the NPs (1.4 × 10<sup>8</sup> eV) is higher than 1 eV suggesting strong adsorption at aqueous interface leading to foam stability. The nanofoam reached a maximum of 50 MRF, while MFomax was below 40 MRF. Subsequently, all the foam descended to lower quality regions around 5 PVI due to the change in foam morphology. Furthermore, the EOR recorded by nanofoam demonstrates a 7% increase on top of MFomax recovery factor. Thus, it can be deduced that the synergy of SiO<sub>2</sub> NPs with MFomax offer several benefits in improving the foam stability, quality, MRF and EOR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19756,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 441-450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249525001000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Oil reservoirs subjected to a gas recovery technique are commonly challenged by early gas breakthroughs affecting the production rate. Foam is injected to block and divert gas to reservoir sections, however, achieving this mechanism requires stable foam to withstand extreme reservoir conditions, such as temperature, pressure and salinity. In this work, synergy actions between aminopropyltriethoxysilane doped SiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and MFomax were investigated on rheology, interfacial tension (IFT), wettability, foam stability and quality to reduce gas mobility and enhance oil recovery (EOR). The formulation was guided by optimization, and the foam studies were carried out at optimum concentrations. Core-flood equipment was used to assess the gas mobility reduction factor (MRF) and EOR. From the findings, the foamability of the nanofluid is primarily governed by synergy action between the NPs and MFomax due to significant R2 value (0.9; p < 0.05). Presence of NPs in the formulation resulted in good fluid properties such viscosity and IFT. The nanofoam stability has improved tremendously to 119% relative to MFomax foam. According to the IFT and contact angle, the detachment energy of the NPs (1.4 × 108 eV) is higher than 1 eV suggesting strong adsorption at aqueous interface leading to foam stability. The nanofoam reached a maximum of 50 MRF, while MFomax was below 40 MRF. Subsequently, all the foam descended to lower quality regions around 5 PVI due to the change in foam morphology. Furthermore, the EOR recorded by nanofoam demonstrates a 7% increase on top of MFomax recovery factor. Thus, it can be deduced that the synergy of SiO2 NPs with MFomax offer several benefits in improving the foam stability, quality, MRF and EOR.