Supreeta R Shettar, Mahadevaiah Neelambike Sumana, Manjunath S Shetty, Yogeesh D Maheshwarappa, Raghukanth Reddy, Asha Srinivasan, Gautam Kalyatanda, Amruthraj G Gowda
{"title":"Impact of a structured urine culture request form on antimicrobial stewardship in urinary tract infections at a tertiary care hospital in India.","authors":"Supreeta R Shettar, Mahadevaiah Neelambike Sumana, Manjunath S Shetty, Yogeesh D Maheshwarappa, Raghukanth Reddy, Asha Srinivasan, Gautam Kalyatanda, Amruthraj G Gowda","doi":"10.3389/frabi.2026.1793784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interpretation of urine culture results requires key clinical information such as symptom status, catheterization, and multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) risk. However, this information is frequently absent from routine request forms, contributing to overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and suboptimal antimicrobial prescribing. This study evaluated the impact of implementing a structured urine-culture request form as part of a diagnostic and therapeutic stewardship program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, non-randomized interventional study was conducted at an 1800-bed tertiary-care hospital in India (March 2023-March 2024). Patients undergoing urine culture testing in Urology/Nephrology departments used a structured request form capturing symptoms, risk factors, and clinical context (test arm), while General Medicine continued routine forms (control arm). Primary outcomes included ASB treatment, MDRO detection, recurrence, and guideline-concordant prescribing. Patients were followed for one year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 484 patients were included (198 test arm, 286 control arm). Antibiotic treatment for ASB was significantly lower in the test arm compared with the control arm (3.6% vs 67.0%; p < 0.001), without adverse outcomes. Guideline-compliant prescribing was higher in the test arm (73.7% vs 26.2%; p < 0.001). MDRO prevalence was higher in the test arm (32.2% vs 11.3%), reflecting greater clinical complexity rather than the intervention itself. Recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) within one year was significantly lower in the test arm (14.1% vs 29.0%; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Introducing a structured urine-culture request form improved diagnostic clarity and antibiotic prescribing, particularly by reducing unnecessary treatment of ASB and increasing guideline compliance, without compromising patient outcomes. This low-cost intervention represents a practical and scalable diagnostic stewardship strategy for improving UTI management.</p>","PeriodicalId":73065,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in antibiotics","volume":"5 ","pages":"1793784"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13266402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frabi.2026.1793784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Interpretation of urine culture results requires key clinical information such as symptom status, catheterization, and multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) risk. However, this information is frequently absent from routine request forms, contributing to overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and suboptimal antimicrobial prescribing. This study evaluated the impact of implementing a structured urine-culture request form as part of a diagnostic and therapeutic stewardship program.
Methods: This prospective, non-randomized interventional study was conducted at an 1800-bed tertiary-care hospital in India (March 2023-March 2024). Patients undergoing urine culture testing in Urology/Nephrology departments used a structured request form capturing symptoms, risk factors, and clinical context (test arm), while General Medicine continued routine forms (control arm). Primary outcomes included ASB treatment, MDRO detection, recurrence, and guideline-concordant prescribing. Patients were followed for one year.
Results: A total of 484 patients were included (198 test arm, 286 control arm). Antibiotic treatment for ASB was significantly lower in the test arm compared with the control arm (3.6% vs 67.0%; p < 0.001), without adverse outcomes. Guideline-compliant prescribing was higher in the test arm (73.7% vs 26.2%; p < 0.001). MDRO prevalence was higher in the test arm (32.2% vs 11.3%), reflecting greater clinical complexity rather than the intervention itself. Recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) within one year was significantly lower in the test arm (14.1% vs 29.0%; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Introducing a structured urine-culture request form improved diagnostic clarity and antibiotic prescribing, particularly by reducing unnecessary treatment of ASB and increasing guideline compliance, without compromising patient outcomes. This low-cost intervention represents a practical and scalable diagnostic stewardship strategy for improving UTI management.
背景:尿培养结果的解释需要关键的临床信息,如症状状态、导尿和多药耐药菌(MDRO)风险。然而,这些信息经常在常规申请表中缺失,导致无症状细菌(ASB)的过度治疗和不理想的抗菌药物处方。本研究评估了将结构化尿液培养申请表作为诊断和治疗管理计划的一部分所产生的影响。方法:这项前瞻性、非随机介入研究于2023年3月至2024年3月在印度一家拥有1800个床位的三级医院进行。在泌尿科/肾脏病科接受尿培养试验的患者使用结构化的请求表格(测试组),其中包含症状、危险因素和临床背景,而普通内科继续使用常规表格(对照组)。主要结局包括ASB治疗、MDRO检测、复发和符合指南的处方。患者随访一年。结果:共纳入484例患者(试验组198例,对照组286例)。试验组ASB抗生素治疗显著低于对照组(3.6% vs 67.0%, p < 0.001),无不良结局。在试验组中,符合指南的处方更高(73.7% vs 26.2%; p < 0.001)。试验组的MDRO患病率更高(32.2% vs 11.3%),反映了更大的临床复杂性,而不是干预本身。试验组1年内尿路感染复发率显著低于对照组(14.1% vs 29.0%; p < 0.001)。结论:引入结构化尿培养要求表可提高诊断清晰度和抗生素处方,特别是通过减少不必要的ASB治疗和提高指南依从性,而不影响患者的预后。这种低成本的干预措施是改善尿路感染管理的一种实用且可扩展的诊断管理策略。