Subsidy Schemes to Alleviate the Burden of Travelling for Healthcare: A Brief Report on Users' Experiences in Queensland, Australia

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Leah Zajdlewicz, Belinda C. Goodwin, Emma Pearse, Fiona Crawford-Williams, Elizabeth A. Johnston
{"title":"Subsidy Schemes to Alleviate the Burden of Travelling for Healthcare: A Brief Report on Users' Experiences in Queensland, Australia","authors":"Leah Zajdlewicz,&nbsp;Belinda C. Goodwin,&nbsp;Emma Pearse,&nbsp;Fiona Crawford-Williams,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Johnston","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>For people in rural and remote areas, government-funded travel subsidy schemes provide vital financial assistance and equitable access to specialist healthcare in city centres. However, few studies have examined users' experiences of these schemes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adults travelling for healthcare in Queensland, Australia, completed an online survey capturing their most recent experience applying for the Patient Travel Subsidy Scheme (PTSS). Participants' responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From 69 respondents (aged 29–80 years, 60% female, 88% most recent application for cancer-related care), 57% agreed information about the scheme was easy to access, although only 39% found the initial registration process easy. Most indicated that local hospital staff and PTSS officers were knowledgeable and helpful (65%–70%). Less agreed that staff were available to assist (48%) or that processes were well-coordinated across hospitals (42%). Of those who sought reimbursement for travel costs (75%), almost two-thirds (63%) were out-of-pocket post-reimbursement (mean = AU$725; range = AU$20–10 000). Delayed reimbursement was relatively common (60%) and contributed to financial hardship (36%). For some (13%), challenges accessing the scheme impacted treatment decisions. User feedback included improved visibility of online application and reimbursement status, and fast-tracking of high-risk, urgent and ongoing cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>While information about the scheme and interactions with frontline staff were viewed positively by most, several system-level challenges remain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>Substantial out-of-pocket costs and reimbursement delays contribute to financial hardship and can affect treatment decisions. Increased subsidy reflecting actual travel costs, timely reimbursement, fast-tracking, and greater application assistance and coordination would improve user experiences.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70207","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue Addressed

For people in rural and remote areas, government-funded travel subsidy schemes provide vital financial assistance and equitable access to specialist healthcare in city centres. However, few studies have examined users' experiences of these schemes.

Methods

Adults travelling for healthcare in Queensland, Australia, completed an online survey capturing their most recent experience applying for the Patient Travel Subsidy Scheme (PTSS). Participants' responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results

From 69 respondents (aged 29–80 years, 60% female, 88% most recent application for cancer-related care), 57% agreed information about the scheme was easy to access, although only 39% found the initial registration process easy. Most indicated that local hospital staff and PTSS officers were knowledgeable and helpful (65%–70%). Less agreed that staff were available to assist (48%) or that processes were well-coordinated across hospitals (42%). Of those who sought reimbursement for travel costs (75%), almost two-thirds (63%) were out-of-pocket post-reimbursement (mean = AU$725; range = AU$20–10 000). Delayed reimbursement was relatively common (60%) and contributed to financial hardship (36%). For some (13%), challenges accessing the scheme impacted treatment decisions. User feedback included improved visibility of online application and reimbursement status, and fast-tracking of high-risk, urgent and ongoing cases.

Conclusions

While information about the scheme and interactions with frontline staff were viewed positively by most, several system-level challenges remain.

So What?

Substantial out-of-pocket costs and reimbursement delays contribute to financial hardship and can affect treatment decisions. Increased subsidy reflecting actual travel costs, timely reimbursement, fast-tracking, and greater application assistance and coordination would improve user experiences.

减轻医疗旅行负担的补贴计划:澳大利亚昆士兰州用户体验的简要报告
所处理的问题:对于农村和偏远地区的人,政府资助的旅行补贴计划提供了至关重要的财政援助和在城市中心公平获得专业医疗保健的机会。然而,很少有研究调查了这些方案的用户体验。方法:在澳大利亚昆士兰州进行医疗旅行的成年人完成了一项在线调查,记录了他们最近申请患者旅行补贴计划(PTSS)的经历。使用描述性统计和专题分析对与会者的答复进行了分析。结果:69名受访者(年龄29-80岁,60%为女性,88%最近申请癌症相关治疗)中,57%的人认为该计划的信息很容易获取,尽管只有39%的人认为初始注册过程很容易。大多数人表示当地医院工作人员和PTSS官员知识渊博,乐于助人(65%-70%)。较少的人认为有工作人员可以提供协助(48%),或者医院之间的流程协调良好(42%)。在那些寻求差旅费用报销的人中(75%),近三分之二(63%)的人在报销后自付(平均= 725澳元;范围= 20-1万澳元)。延迟报销相对常见(60%),并导致经济困难(36%)。对于一些人(13%)来说,获得该计划的挑战影响了治疗决策。用户反馈包括提高在线申请和报销状态的可见性,以及快速跟踪高风险、紧急和正在进行的病例。结论:虽然大多数人对该计划的信息和与一线员工的互动持积极态度,但仍存在一些系统层面的挑战。那又怎样?大量的自付费用和报销延迟造成经济困难,并可能影响治疗决定。增加补贴,反映实际旅行成本,及时报销,快速跟踪,更多的申请援助和协调将改善用户体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书