Leah Zajdlewicz, Belinda C. Goodwin, Emma Pearse, Fiona Crawford-Williams, Elizabeth A. Johnston
{"title":"Subsidy Schemes to Alleviate the Burden of Travelling for Healthcare: A Brief Report on Users' Experiences in Queensland, Australia","authors":"Leah Zajdlewicz, Belinda C. Goodwin, Emma Pearse, Fiona Crawford-Williams, Elizabeth A. Johnston","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>For people in rural and remote areas, government-funded travel subsidy schemes provide vital financial assistance and equitable access to specialist healthcare in city centres. However, few studies have examined users' experiences of these schemes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adults travelling for healthcare in Queensland, Australia, completed an online survey capturing their most recent experience applying for the Patient Travel Subsidy Scheme (PTSS). Participants' responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From 69 respondents (aged 29–80 years, 60% female, 88% most recent application for cancer-related care), 57% agreed information about the scheme was easy to access, although only 39% found the initial registration process easy. Most indicated that local hospital staff and PTSS officers were knowledgeable and helpful (65%–70%). Less agreed that staff were available to assist (48%) or that processes were well-coordinated across hospitals (42%). Of those who sought reimbursement for travel costs (75%), almost two-thirds (63%) were out-of-pocket post-reimbursement (mean = AU$725; range = AU$20–10 000). Delayed reimbursement was relatively common (60%) and contributed to financial hardship (36%). For some (13%), challenges accessing the scheme impacted treatment decisions. User feedback included improved visibility of online application and reimbursement status, and fast-tracking of high-risk, urgent and ongoing cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>While information about the scheme and interactions with frontline staff were viewed positively by most, several system-level challenges remain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>Substantial out-of-pocket costs and reimbursement delays contribute to financial hardship and can affect treatment decisions. Increased subsidy reflecting actual travel costs, timely reimbursement, fast-tracking, and greater application assistance and coordination would improve user experiences.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70207","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Issue Addressed
For people in rural and remote areas, government-funded travel subsidy schemes provide vital financial assistance and equitable access to specialist healthcare in city centres. However, few studies have examined users' experiences of these schemes.
Methods
Adults travelling for healthcare in Queensland, Australia, completed an online survey capturing their most recent experience applying for the Patient Travel Subsidy Scheme (PTSS). Participants' responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
Results
From 69 respondents (aged 29–80 years, 60% female, 88% most recent application for cancer-related care), 57% agreed information about the scheme was easy to access, although only 39% found the initial registration process easy. Most indicated that local hospital staff and PTSS officers were knowledgeable and helpful (65%–70%). Less agreed that staff were available to assist (48%) or that processes were well-coordinated across hospitals (42%). Of those who sought reimbursement for travel costs (75%), almost two-thirds (63%) were out-of-pocket post-reimbursement (mean = AU$725; range = AU$20–10 000). Delayed reimbursement was relatively common (60%) and contributed to financial hardship (36%). For some (13%), challenges accessing the scheme impacted treatment decisions. User feedback included improved visibility of online application and reimbursement status, and fast-tracking of high-risk, urgent and ongoing cases.
Conclusions
While information about the scheme and interactions with frontline staff were viewed positively by most, several system-level challenges remain.
So What?
Substantial out-of-pocket costs and reimbursement delays contribute to financial hardship and can affect treatment decisions. Increased subsidy reflecting actual travel costs, timely reimbursement, fast-tracking, and greater application assistance and coordination would improve user experiences.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.