Rachel L King, Stuart Warren, Elizabeth Vass, Benjamin T Sharpe, Kian Beaumont, Stewart Seymour, Samuel Bell, Rosana Pacella, Antonina Pereira
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of a community-based dementia support model: evidence from a real-world economic evaluation.","authors":"Rachel L King, Stuart Warren, Elizabeth Vass, Benjamin T Sharpe, Kian Beaumont, Stewart Seymour, Samuel Bell, Rosana Pacella, Antonina Pereira","doi":"10.1186/s12962-026-00782-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of dementia is currently set to rise to 1.7 million by 2040, with associated costs estimated at £90 billion. Given its substantial impact on quality of life (QoL) and the growing societal and financial burden, identifying efficient approaches to dementia support is a key policy priority. Current policy direction emphasises a shift toward community-based models of care; however, economic evidence is required to determine whether such approaches can improve outcomes while representing cost-effective use of limited healthcare resources. This study presents a cost-effectiveness analysis of the Sage House Model, a community-based dementia support intervention integrating NHS diagnostic services, third-sector provision, and local partnerships within a single hub.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a natural experimental design comparing individuals with dementia accessing the Sage House Model (n = 65) to those receiving usual care (n = 153). Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was assessed using a single measure, alongside health and social care utilisation, over a three-month period. Resource use was valued from a health and social care perspective. Incremental costs and outcomes were estimated to assess cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Sage House Model was associated with lower incremental costs and higher incremental QALYs compared to usual care over the three-month time horizon and was likely to be cost-effective, with a 72.2% probability at a £20,000 willingness-to-pay threshold and 74.7% at £30,000 per QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide preliminary evidence that community-based dementia support approaches, such as the Sage House Model, may represent a promising strategy for improving outcomes alongside more efficient use of health and social care resources, and therefore warrants larger scale investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00782-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of dementia is currently set to rise to 1.7 million by 2040, with associated costs estimated at £90 billion. Given its substantial impact on quality of life (QoL) and the growing societal and financial burden, identifying efficient approaches to dementia support is a key policy priority. Current policy direction emphasises a shift toward community-based models of care; however, economic evidence is required to determine whether such approaches can improve outcomes while representing cost-effective use of limited healthcare resources. This study presents a cost-effectiveness analysis of the Sage House Model, a community-based dementia support intervention integrating NHS diagnostic services, third-sector provision, and local partnerships within a single hub.
Methods: A preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a natural experimental design comparing individuals with dementia accessing the Sage House Model (n = 65) to those receiving usual care (n = 153). Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was assessed using a single measure, alongside health and social care utilisation, over a three-month period. Resource use was valued from a health and social care perspective. Incremental costs and outcomes were estimated to assess cost-effectiveness.
Results: The Sage House Model was associated with lower incremental costs and higher incremental QALYs compared to usual care over the three-month time horizon and was likely to be cost-effective, with a 72.2% probability at a £20,000 willingness-to-pay threshold and 74.7% at £30,000 per QALY.
Conclusions: These findings provide preliminary evidence that community-based dementia support approaches, such as the Sage House Model, may represent a promising strategy for improving outcomes alongside more efficient use of health and social care resources, and therefore warrants larger scale investigation.
期刊介绍:
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.