Cost-effectiveness of a community-based dementia support model: evidence from a real-world economic evaluation.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Rachel L King, Stuart Warren, Elizabeth Vass, Benjamin T Sharpe, Kian Beaumont, Stewart Seymour, Samuel Bell, Rosana Pacella, Antonina Pereira
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of a community-based dementia support model: evidence from a real-world economic evaluation.","authors":"Rachel L King, Stuart Warren, Elizabeth Vass, Benjamin T Sharpe, Kian Beaumont, Stewart Seymour, Samuel Bell, Rosana Pacella, Antonina Pereira","doi":"10.1186/s12962-026-00782-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of dementia is currently set to rise to 1.7 million by 2040, with associated costs estimated at £90 billion. Given its substantial impact on quality of life (QoL) and the growing societal and financial burden, identifying efficient approaches to dementia support is a key policy priority. Current policy direction emphasises a shift toward community-based models of care; however, economic evidence is required to determine whether such approaches can improve outcomes while representing cost-effective use of limited healthcare resources. This study presents a cost-effectiveness analysis of the Sage House Model, a community-based dementia support intervention integrating NHS diagnostic services, third-sector provision, and local partnerships within a single hub.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a natural experimental design comparing individuals with dementia accessing the Sage House Model (n = 65) to those receiving usual care (n = 153). Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was assessed using a single measure, alongside health and social care utilisation, over a three-month period. Resource use was valued from a health and social care perspective. Incremental costs and outcomes were estimated to assess cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Sage House Model was associated with lower incremental costs and higher incremental QALYs compared to usual care over the three-month time horizon and was likely to be cost-effective, with a 72.2% probability at a £20,000 willingness-to-pay threshold and 74.7% at £30,000 per QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide preliminary evidence that community-based dementia support approaches, such as the Sage House Model, may represent a promising strategy for improving outcomes alongside more efficient use of health and social care resources, and therefore warrants larger scale investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00782-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of dementia is currently set to rise to 1.7 million by 2040, with associated costs estimated at £90 billion. Given its substantial impact on quality of life (QoL) and the growing societal and financial burden, identifying efficient approaches to dementia support is a key policy priority. Current policy direction emphasises a shift toward community-based models of care; however, economic evidence is required to determine whether such approaches can improve outcomes while representing cost-effective use of limited healthcare resources. This study presents a cost-effectiveness analysis of the Sage House Model, a community-based dementia support intervention integrating NHS diagnostic services, third-sector provision, and local partnerships within a single hub.

Methods: A preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a natural experimental design comparing individuals with dementia accessing the Sage House Model (n = 65) to those receiving usual care (n = 153). Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was assessed using a single measure, alongside health and social care utilisation, over a three-month period. Resource use was valued from a health and social care perspective. Incremental costs and outcomes were estimated to assess cost-effectiveness.

Results: The Sage House Model was associated with lower incremental costs and higher incremental QALYs compared to usual care over the three-month time horizon and was likely to be cost-effective, with a 72.2% probability at a £20,000 willingness-to-pay threshold and 74.7% at £30,000 per QALY.

Conclusions: These findings provide preliminary evidence that community-based dementia support approaches, such as the Sage House Model, may represent a promising strategy for improving outcomes alongside more efficient use of health and social care resources, and therefore warrants larger scale investigation.

基于社区的痴呆症支持模式的成本效益:来自现实世界经济评估的证据。
背景:到2040年,痴呆症的患病率将上升到170万,相关费用估计为900亿英镑。鉴于痴呆症对生活质量的重大影响以及日益加重的社会和经济负担,确定有效的痴呆症支持方法是一项关键的政策重点。目前的政策方向强调转向以社区为基础的护理模式;然而,需要经济证据来确定这些方法是否可以改善结果,同时代表具有成本效益地使用有限的医疗资源。本研究提出了Sage House模型的成本效益分析,该模型是一种基于社区的痴呆症支持干预,整合了NHS诊断服务、第三部门提供和单一中心内的当地合作伙伴关系。方法:采用自然实验设计对使用Sage House模型的痴呆患者(n = 65)和接受常规护理的痴呆患者(n = 153)进行初步成本-效果分析。在三个月内收集与健康有关的生活质量(HRQoL)以及健康和社会护理的利用情况,并从健康和社会护理的角度进行评估。估算增量成本和结果以评估成本效益。结果:在三个月的时间范围内,与常规护理相比,Sage House模型具有较低的增量成本和较高的增量QALY,并且可能具有成本效益,在20,000英镑的支付意愿阈值下有72.2%的概率,在每个QALY 30,000英镑时有74.7%的概率。结论:这些发现提供了初步证据,表明以社区为基础的痴呆症支持方法,如Sage House模型,可能是一种有希望的策略,可以改善结果,同时更有效地利用卫生和社会护理资源,因此值得进行更大规模的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书