Psychometric properties of MyCommunication-Children: an item bank for measuring communicative participation in children with speech, language, voice disorders or hearing loss.

IF 2.9 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Eline Alons, Margreet Roelien Luinge, Ellen Gerrits, Nicole Ter Wal, Lizet Van Ewijk, Benjamin Schalet, Caroline Barbara Terwee
{"title":"Psychometric properties of MyCommunication-Children: an item bank for measuring communicative participation in children with speech, language, voice disorders or hearing loss.","authors":"Eline Alons, Margreet Roelien Luinge, Ellen Gerrits, Nicole Ter Wal, Lizet Van Ewijk, Benjamin Schalet, Caroline Barbara Terwee","doi":"10.1186/s41687-026-01118-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communicative participation is the most important outcome of speech and language therapy. However, there are no instruments to measure communicative participation in children. This paper focuses on assessing the psychometric properties of MyCommunication-Children, an item bank designed to measure communicative participation in children with speech, language, or voice disorders, as well as hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A total of 310 children with communication difficulties participated in the study. They completed the full item pool of 49 items, along with three comparator questionnaires: the PROMIS® Pediatric Peer Relationships and two single items measuring communication and communicative participation. Psychometric evaluation focused on structural validity, construct validity, and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen of the 49 items were removed through systematic item reduction. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bifactor modeling supported sufficient unidimensionality, indicating that communicative participation can be reliably measured as a single construct. Moderate correlations with related constructs (e.g., communication, communicative participation, and peer relationships) further supported the construct validity of MyCommunication-Children. Two short forms were developed for different purposes: a 10-item version measuring communicative participation across all contexts, and a 9-item version measuring communicative participation within the school context. Reliability analyses showed high reliability for the full item bank and sufficient reliability for both short forms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide sufficient evidence to support the validity and reliability of the MyCommunication-Children instrument for measuring communicative participation from the perspective of children with communication difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13518642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01118-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Communicative participation is the most important outcome of speech and language therapy. However, there are no instruments to measure communicative participation in children. This paper focuses on assessing the psychometric properties of MyCommunication-Children, an item bank designed to measure communicative participation in children with speech, language, or voice disorders, as well as hearing loss.

Methodology: A total of 310 children with communication difficulties participated in the study. They completed the full item pool of 49 items, along with three comparator questionnaires: the PROMIS® Pediatric Peer Relationships and two single items measuring communication and communicative participation. Psychometric evaluation focused on structural validity, construct validity, and reliability.

Results: Seventeen of the 49 items were removed through systematic item reduction. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bifactor modeling supported sufficient unidimensionality, indicating that communicative participation can be reliably measured as a single construct. Moderate correlations with related constructs (e.g., communication, communicative participation, and peer relationships) further supported the construct validity of MyCommunication-Children. Two short forms were developed for different purposes: a 10-item version measuring communicative participation across all contexts, and a 9-item version measuring communicative participation within the school context. Reliability analyses showed high reliability for the full item bank and sufficient reliability for both short forms.

Conclusion: The results provide sufficient evidence to support the validity and reliability of the MyCommunication-Children instrument for measuring communicative participation from the perspective of children with communication difficulties.

MyCommunication-Children的心理测量特性:一个用于测量言语、语言、声音障碍或听力损失儿童交流参与的项目库。
背景:交际参与是言语和语言治疗最重要的结果。然而,没有工具来衡量儿童的交际参与。本文着重于评估MyCommunication-Children的心理测量特性,这是一个旨在测量言语、语言或声音障碍以及听力损失儿童的交流参与的项目库。方法:共有310名有沟通困难的儿童参与本研究。他们完成了49个完整的题库,以及三个比较问卷:PROMIS®儿科同伴关系和两个衡量沟通和沟通参与的单项问卷。心理测量学评价主要关注结构效度、构念效度和信度。结果:通过系统的项目缩减,49个项目中有17个被剔除。验证性因子分析(CFA)和双因子模型支持足够的单维性,表明交际参与可以作为一个单一的结构来可靠地测量。与相关构念(如沟通、沟通参与和同伴关系)的适度相关进一步支持了MyCommunication-Children的构念效度。为了不同的目的,我们开发了两种简短的形式:一种是测量所有情境下的交际参与的10项版本,一种是测量学校情境下的交际参与的9项版本。信度分析表明,完整题库的信度较高,两种简短形式的信度都足够。结论:本研究结果提供了足够的证据支持MyCommunication-Children量表从沟通困难儿童的角度衡量沟通参与的效度和信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书