Patient experiences of Dupuytren's contracture and its treatment : a qualitative investigation.

IF 3.3 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Paul Leighton, Maria Armaou, Catherine Arundel, Puvan Tharmanathan, Joseph Dias
{"title":"Patient experiences of Dupuytren's contracture and its treatment : a qualitative investigation.","authors":"Paul Leighton, Maria Armaou, Catherine Arundel, Puvan Tharmanathan, Joseph Dias","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.76.BJO-2026-0002.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Our aim was to investigate patient experiences of Dupuytren's contracture and its treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A purposive sample of 45 participants enrolled in the Dupuytren's Interventions Surgery vs Collagenase (DISC) trial. Participants were interviewed three to six months after treatment. Interviews were semistructured and analyzed using an inductive, thematic approach, with data collection and analysis integrated iteratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported living for extended periods with contracture and seeking medical advice only when they had trouble doing practical tasks or when self-conscious about their appearance. Most participants reported improvement irrespective of treatment modality. Some participants who were treated with collagenase noted that while the outcome was not perfect, it was acceptable. More participants who were treated with collagenase reported preferring collagenase in the future, compared with the proportion preferring further surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research contributes to our knowledge of how treatments for Dupuytren's contracture are understood and experienced. It demonstrates that treatment experience is important to patients, and that they are often willing to accept a compromise in outcome for an easier treatment experience. Patients may be willing to accept multiple, repeated treatments. As a result, non-surgical or noninvasive treatment options, such as collagenase, are likely to be popular and could reduce delay in seeking treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 6","pages":"802-808"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13271826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.76.BJO-2026-0002.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Our aim was to investigate patient experiences of Dupuytren's contracture and its treatment.

Methods: A purposive sample of 45 participants enrolled in the Dupuytren's Interventions Surgery vs Collagenase (DISC) trial. Participants were interviewed three to six months after treatment. Interviews were semistructured and analyzed using an inductive, thematic approach, with data collection and analysis integrated iteratively.

Results: Participants reported living for extended periods with contracture and seeking medical advice only when they had trouble doing practical tasks or when self-conscious about their appearance. Most participants reported improvement irrespective of treatment modality. Some participants who were treated with collagenase noted that while the outcome was not perfect, it was acceptable. More participants who were treated with collagenase reported preferring collagenase in the future, compared with the proportion preferring further surgery.

Conclusion: This research contributes to our knowledge of how treatments for Dupuytren's contracture are understood and experienced. It demonstrates that treatment experience is important to patients, and that they are often willing to accept a compromise in outcome for an easier treatment experience. Patients may be willing to accept multiple, repeated treatments. As a result, non-surgical or noninvasive treatment options, such as collagenase, are likely to be popular and could reduce delay in seeking treatment.

Dupuytren挛缩的患者经验及治疗:质性调查。
目的:我们的目的是探讨Dupuytren挛缩的患者经验及其治疗。方法:在Dupuytren的干预手术与胶原酶(DISC)试验中纳入了45名参与者的目的样本。参与者在治疗后三到六个月接受采访。访谈是半结构化的,并使用归纳,主题方法进行分析,数据收集和分析迭代集成。结果:参与者报告说,他们长时间患有挛缩,只有在做实际工作有困难或对自己的外表感到不安时才会寻求医疗建议。无论治疗方式如何,大多数参与者都报告了改善。一些接受胶原酶治疗的参与者指出,虽然结果并不完美,但可以接受。与选择进一步手术的比例相比,接受胶原酶治疗的参与者更倾向于在未来使用胶原酶。结论:本研究有助于我们了解和经验如何治疗Dupuytren挛缩。这表明,治疗经验是重要的病人,他们往往愿意接受妥协的结果更容易的治疗经验。患者可能愿意接受多次、重复的治疗。因此,非手术或非侵入性治疗选择,如胶原酶,可能会受到欢迎,并可以减少寻求治疗的延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书