Challenges for implementation of "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) protocols and artificial intelligence support tools in resource-limited countries.

IF 3.3 Q1 SURGERY
Abdullahi Hassan Elmi
{"title":"Challenges for implementation of \"Enhanced Recovery After Surgery\" (ERAS) protocols and artificial intelligence support tools in resource-limited countries.","authors":"Abdullahi Hassan Elmi","doi":"10.1186/s13037-026-00492-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical patient safety remains a major challenge in resource-limited settings, where preventable harm may be increased by delayed assessment, limited monitoring, workforce shortages, weak documentation, and inconsistent use of standardized perioperative protocols. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery offers an evidence-based pathway for improving perioperative care, while artificial intelligence may support risk prediction, complication surveillance, audit feedback, and clinical decision-making. This correspondence argues that artificial intelligence and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery should be considered complementary patient safety strategies rather than separate innovations. In low-resource surgical systems, their combined use may strengthen perioperative reliability, improve early recognition of risk, and support continuous quality improvement. However, implementation must be gradual, locally adapted, ethically governed, and built on essential safety practices such as checklist adherence, multidisciplinary teamwork, staff training, and audit.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13267593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-026-00492-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical patient safety remains a major challenge in resource-limited settings, where preventable harm may be increased by delayed assessment, limited monitoring, workforce shortages, weak documentation, and inconsistent use of standardized perioperative protocols. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery offers an evidence-based pathway for improving perioperative care, while artificial intelligence may support risk prediction, complication surveillance, audit feedback, and clinical decision-making. This correspondence argues that artificial intelligence and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery should be considered complementary patient safety strategies rather than separate innovations. In low-resource surgical systems, their combined use may strengthen perioperative reliability, improve early recognition of risk, and support continuous quality improvement. However, implementation must be gradual, locally adapted, ethically governed, and built on essential safety practices such as checklist adherence, multidisciplinary teamwork, staff training, and audit.

在资源有限的国家实施“增强术后恢复”(ERAS)协议和人工智能支持工具面临的挑战。
在资源有限的情况下,手术患者安全仍然是一个主要挑战,在这些情况下,可预防的伤害可能会因评估延迟、监测有限、劳动力短缺、文件薄弱以及标准化围手术期协议的不一致使用而增加。增强术后恢复为改善围手术期护理提供了循证途径,而人工智能可以支持风险预测、并发症监测、审计反馈和临床决策。本文认为,人工智能和增强术后恢复应被视为互补的患者安全策略,而不是单独的创新。在低资源的外科系统中,它们的联合使用可以增强围手术期的可靠性,提高早期风险识别,并支持持续的质量改进。然而,实施必须是渐进的、因地制宜的、合乎道德的,并建立在基本的安全实践基础上,如遵守检查表、多学科团队合作、员工培训和审计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书