From Prediction to Horizon: Clinicians' Negotiations of AI-Driven Personal Prognoses in Clinical Practice.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Iben Mundbjerg Gjødsbøl, Mette Nordahl Svendsen
{"title":"From Prediction to Horizon: Clinicians' Negotiations of AI-Driven Personal Prognoses in Clinical Practice.","authors":"Iben Mundbjerg Gjødsbøl, Mette Nordahl Svendsen","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.70209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computational methods and tools under the label 'artificial intelligence' (AI) are increasingly promoted as solutions to the challenges of under-resourced and understaffed healthcare systems, with predictive modelling positioned as a means to improve efficiency and individualise care. Yet little is known about how predictive algorithms are taken up in the everyday practices of clinical decision-making. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with Danish cardiologists working with the CARDIA<sup>IHD</sup> algorithm, this article examines how AI-driven personal prognoses intersect with clinical reasoning and organisational temporalities. We show, first, that complex algorithms introduce new forms of interpretive work; second, that their mathematical non-linear reasoning often conflicts with clinicians' causal and chronological frameworks; and third, that actionable horizons do not simply emerge with a survival prognosis but must be situated within specific times, places and organisational demands. Conceptualising prognostication with AI as horizoning, we argue that algorithmic personal prognoses do not straightforwardly deliver actionable futures, but must be anchored within the temporal and organisational conditions of clinical work to guide decision-making. Our findings advance sociological debates on the future by demonstrating that in algorithmically informed healthcare, the future is not a pre-given horizon but a negotiated, relational and socially enacted terrain.</p>","PeriodicalId":21685,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of health & illness","volume":"48 5","pages":"e70209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13270078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of health & illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70209","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational methods and tools under the label 'artificial intelligence' (AI) are increasingly promoted as solutions to the challenges of under-resourced and understaffed healthcare systems, with predictive modelling positioned as a means to improve efficiency and individualise care. Yet little is known about how predictive algorithms are taken up in the everyday practices of clinical decision-making. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with Danish cardiologists working with the CARDIAIHD algorithm, this article examines how AI-driven personal prognoses intersect with clinical reasoning and organisational temporalities. We show, first, that complex algorithms introduce new forms of interpretive work; second, that their mathematical non-linear reasoning often conflicts with clinicians' causal and chronological frameworks; and third, that actionable horizons do not simply emerge with a survival prognosis but must be situated within specific times, places and organisational demands. Conceptualising prognostication with AI as horizoning, we argue that algorithmic personal prognoses do not straightforwardly deliver actionable futures, but must be anchored within the temporal and organisational conditions of clinical work to guide decision-making. Our findings advance sociological debates on the future by demonstrating that in algorithmically informed healthcare, the future is not a pre-given horizon but a negotiated, relational and socially enacted terrain.

从预测到地平线:临床医生在临床实践中对人工智能驱动的个人预后的谈判。
“人工智能”(AI)标签下的计算方法和工具越来越多地被推广为解决资源不足和人手不足的医疗系统挑战的解决方案,预测建模被定位为提高效率和个性化护理的手段。然而,对于预测算法在临床决策的日常实践中是如何应用的,人们知之甚少。通过与使用CARDIAIHD算法的丹麦心脏病学家进行的人种学田野调查,本文研究了人工智能驱动的个人预后如何与临床推理和组织暂时性相交叉。首先,我们展示了复杂算法引入了新形式的解释工作;其次,他们的数学非线性推理常常与临床医生的因果和时间框架相冲突;第三,可操作的视野不是简单地与生存预测一起出现,而是必须位于特定的时间、地点和组织需求中。将人工智能的预测概念化为地平线,我们认为算法个人预测不能直接提供可操作的未来,但必须在临床工作的时间和组织条件下进行锚定,以指导决策。我们的研究结果通过证明在算法知情的医疗保健中,未来不是预先给定的地平线,而是协商,关系和社会制定的地形,从而推进了关于未来的社会学辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Sociology of Health & Illness is an international journal which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, medicine and health care. We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书