Quantification of pendelluft in electrical impedance tomography data: opening pandora's box? a literature review of analytical methods.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Annemijn H Jonkman, Juliette E Francovich, Anne Lotte Kuiper, Diederik Gommers, Gaetano Scaramuzzo, Peter Somhorst
{"title":"Quantification of pendelluft in electrical impedance tomography data: opening pandora's box? a literature review of analytical methods.","authors":"Annemijn H Jonkman, Juliette E Francovich, Anne Lotte Kuiper, Diederik Gommers, Gaetano Scaramuzzo, Peter Somhorst","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/ae7d81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction.</i>Pendelluft, i.e. the movement of air between different lung regions, has been associated with lung injury and ventilation inefficiencies in mechanically ventilated patients. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is the only bedside technology for real-time imaging of pendelluft. However, no universal method exists for measuring and quantifying pendelluft on EIT data. This review aims to evaluate and summarize the methods used to quantify pendelluft, with a focus on EIT analysis techniques.<i>Approach</i>. A search was conducted in three databases: Embase, Web of Science and Medline, using predefined search criteria. Steps for preprocessing and computation of pendelluft were identified. Calculation steps were standardized to enable comparison across studies, and the methods were applied to EIT data to visualize the differences between them.<i>Main results</i>. 19 studies were included, with six unique methods for quantifying pendelluft on EIT data. The methods have some similarities, but mostly quantify pendelluft differently. Preprocessing methods vary greatly among the methods. These methodological differences are reflected in the variability of results when applying the methods to patient data.<i>Significance</i>. Different methods for quantifying pendelluft with EIT exist, which differ considerably in pendelluft quantification and in EIT preprocessing. Further development and consensus on quantification techniques and standardized reporting are necessary for advancing research into pendelluft and its impact, and improving clinical applicability. This highlights a promising research avenue for EIT as bedside modality for monitoring the impact of spontaneous breathing on regional lung mechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae7d81","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction.Pendelluft, i.e. the movement of air between different lung regions, has been associated with lung injury and ventilation inefficiencies in mechanically ventilated patients. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is the only bedside technology for real-time imaging of pendelluft. However, no universal method exists for measuring and quantifying pendelluft on EIT data. This review aims to evaluate and summarize the methods used to quantify pendelluft, with a focus on EIT analysis techniques.Approach. A search was conducted in three databases: Embase, Web of Science and Medline, using predefined search criteria. Steps for preprocessing and computation of pendelluft were identified. Calculation steps were standardized to enable comparison across studies, and the methods were applied to EIT data to visualize the differences between them.Main results. 19 studies were included, with six unique methods for quantifying pendelluft on EIT data. The methods have some similarities, but mostly quantify pendelluft differently. Preprocessing methods vary greatly among the methods. These methodological differences are reflected in the variability of results when applying the methods to patient data.Significance. Different methods for quantifying pendelluft with EIT exist, which differ considerably in pendelluft quantification and in EIT preprocessing. Further development and consensus on quantification techniques and standardized reporting are necessary for advancing research into pendelluft and its impact, and improving clinical applicability. This highlights a promising research avenue for EIT as bedside modality for monitoring the impact of spontaneous breathing on regional lung mechanics.

电阻抗断层成像数据中钟摆的量化:打开潘多拉的盒子?分析方法的文献综述。
Pendelluft,即不同肺区域之间的空气运动,与机械通气患者的肺损伤和通气效率低下有关。电阻抗断层成像(EIT)是唯一的床边技术实时成像钟摆。然而,没有一种通用的方法来测量和量化EIT数据上的钟摆。本综述旨在评价和总结用于量化钟摆的方法,重点是EIT分析技术。 ;方法 ;在三个数据库中进行搜索:Embase、Web of Science和Medline,使用预定义的搜索标准。确定了钟摆的预处理和计算步骤。计算步骤标准化,以便在研究之间进行比较,并将方法应用于EIT数据,以可视化它们之间的差异。 ;主要结果 ;纳入19项研究,采用6种独特的方法量化EIT数据上的钟摆。这些方法有一些相似之处,但对钟摆的量化大多不同。各种方法的预处理方法差别很大。这些方法上的差异反映在将这些方法应用于患者数据时结果的可变性上。对钟摆进行EIT定量的方法多种多样,在钟摆定量和EIT预处理方面存在较大差异。进一步发展量化技术和标准化报告并达成共识对于推进钟摆及其影响的研究和提高临床适用性是必要的。这突出了EIT作为监测自主呼吸对局部肺力学影响的床边模式的一个有前途的研究途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书