Annemijn H Jonkman, Juliette E Francovich, Anne Lotte Kuiper, Diederik Gommers, Gaetano Scaramuzzo, Peter Somhorst
{"title":"Quantification of pendelluft in electrical impedance tomography data: opening pandora's box? a literature review of analytical methods.","authors":"Annemijn H Jonkman, Juliette E Francovich, Anne Lotte Kuiper, Diederik Gommers, Gaetano Scaramuzzo, Peter Somhorst","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/ae7d81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction.</i>Pendelluft, i.e. the movement of air between different lung regions, has been associated with lung injury and ventilation inefficiencies in mechanically ventilated patients. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is the only bedside technology for real-time imaging of pendelluft. However, no universal method exists for measuring and quantifying pendelluft on EIT data. This review aims to evaluate and summarize the methods used to quantify pendelluft, with a focus on EIT analysis techniques.<i>Approach</i>. A search was conducted in three databases: Embase, Web of Science and Medline, using predefined search criteria. Steps for preprocessing and computation of pendelluft were identified. Calculation steps were standardized to enable comparison across studies, and the methods were applied to EIT data to visualize the differences between them.<i>Main results</i>. 19 studies were included, with six unique methods for quantifying pendelluft on EIT data. The methods have some similarities, but mostly quantify pendelluft differently. Preprocessing methods vary greatly among the methods. These methodological differences are reflected in the variability of results when applying the methods to patient data.<i>Significance</i>. Different methods for quantifying pendelluft with EIT exist, which differ considerably in pendelluft quantification and in EIT preprocessing. Further development and consensus on quantification techniques and standardized reporting are necessary for advancing research into pendelluft and its impact, and improving clinical applicability. This highlights a promising research avenue for EIT as bedside modality for monitoring the impact of spontaneous breathing on regional lung mechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae7d81","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction.Pendelluft, i.e. the movement of air between different lung regions, has been associated with lung injury and ventilation inefficiencies in mechanically ventilated patients. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is the only bedside technology for real-time imaging of pendelluft. However, no universal method exists for measuring and quantifying pendelluft on EIT data. This review aims to evaluate and summarize the methods used to quantify pendelluft, with a focus on EIT analysis techniques.Approach. A search was conducted in three databases: Embase, Web of Science and Medline, using predefined search criteria. Steps for preprocessing and computation of pendelluft were identified. Calculation steps were standardized to enable comparison across studies, and the methods were applied to EIT data to visualize the differences between them.Main results. 19 studies were included, with six unique methods for quantifying pendelluft on EIT data. The methods have some similarities, but mostly quantify pendelluft differently. Preprocessing methods vary greatly among the methods. These methodological differences are reflected in the variability of results when applying the methods to patient data.Significance. Different methods for quantifying pendelluft with EIT exist, which differ considerably in pendelluft quantification and in EIT preprocessing. Further development and consensus on quantification techniques and standardized reporting are necessary for advancing research into pendelluft and its impact, and improving clinical applicability. This highlights a promising research avenue for EIT as bedside modality for monitoring the impact of spontaneous breathing on regional lung mechanics.
期刊介绍:
Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation.
Papers are published on topics including:
applied physiology in illness and health
electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques
advanced methods of time series and other data analysis
biomedical and clinical engineering
in-patient and ambulatory monitoring
point-of-care technologies
novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems.
measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology
physiological modeling and simulation
novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems
measurement standards and guidelines.