Rasch Analysis of the 7-Item Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS-7) in Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frederik Have Dornonville de la Cour, Tine Nielsen, Martin Matre, Nada Andelic, Marianne Løvstad, Daniel Løke
{"title":"Rasch Analysis of the 7-Item Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS-7) in Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Frederik Have Dornonville de la Cour, Tine Nielsen, Martin Matre, Nada Andelic, Marianne Løvstad, Daniel Løke","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate validity, reliability, and targeting of the Norwegian 7-item Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS-7) in adults with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Inpatient and outpatient acute care and postacute rehabilitation facilities.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Ninety-four patients with intracranial injury, 20% women, with a mean age of 45.8 years (SD = 13.6), provided 185 complete FSS-7 responses at 6 months (n = 94) and 12 months (n = 91) post-TBI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of data from a longitudinal observational study using the Rasch model and graphical log-linear Rasch models (GLLRM).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The FSS-7 is a self-report fatigue measure derived from the original FSS by omitting items 1 and 2. Differential item functioning (DIF) was examined for sex, age, education, and sleep disturbances (Epworth sleepiness scale and insomnia severity index).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FSS-7 did not fit the Rasch model due to poor fit of item 4 and local dependence between items 5 and 6. A 6-item version (FSS-6), excluding item 4, provided good fit to a GLLRM accounting for the local dependence between items 5 and 6. No DIF or item parameter drift over time was detected. The FSS-6 demonstrated excellent reliability (r = 0.936), while targeting was less than optimal, as on average, only 57% of the maximum obtainable test information was reached.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FSS-6, excluding item 4, provides a valid measure of fatigue with excellent reliability for adults at 6 and 12 months post-TBI. The total raw score is invariant across sex, age, educational level, and sleep disturbances with no item parameter drift from 6 to 12 months postinjury. The FSS-6 may be useful for screening and monitoring fatigue in TBI rehabilitation and research, although a reassessment of targeting is recommended for future research on a larger and broader sample of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate validity, reliability, and targeting of the Norwegian 7-item Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS-7) in adults with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Setting: Inpatient and outpatient acute care and postacute rehabilitation facilities.

Participants: Ninety-four patients with intracranial injury, 20% women, with a mean age of 45.8 years (SD = 13.6), provided 185 complete FSS-7 responses at 6 months (n = 94) and 12 months (n = 91) post-TBI.

Design: Secondary analysis of data from a longitudinal observational study using the Rasch model and graphical log-linear Rasch models (GLLRM).

Main measures: The FSS-7 is a self-report fatigue measure derived from the original FSS by omitting items 1 and 2. Differential item functioning (DIF) was examined for sex, age, education, and sleep disturbances (Epworth sleepiness scale and insomnia severity index).

Results: The FSS-7 did not fit the Rasch model due to poor fit of item 4 and local dependence between items 5 and 6. A 6-item version (FSS-6), excluding item 4, provided good fit to a GLLRM accounting for the local dependence between items 5 and 6. No DIF or item parameter drift over time was detected. The FSS-6 demonstrated excellent reliability (r = 0.936), while targeting was less than optimal, as on average, only 57% of the maximum obtainable test information was reached.

Conclusions: The FSS-6, excluding item 4, provides a valid measure of fatigue with excellent reliability for adults at 6 and 12 months post-TBI. The total raw score is invariant across sex, age, educational level, and sleep disturbances with no item parameter drift from 6 to 12 months postinjury. The FSS-6 may be useful for screening and monitoring fatigue in TBI rehabilitation and research, although a reassessment of targeting is recommended for future research on a larger and broader sample of patients.

外伤性脑损伤疲劳严重程度量表(FSS-7)的Rasch分析
目的:评价挪威7项疲劳严重程度量表(FSS-7)在成人中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中的效度、信度和目标性。环境:住院和门诊急症护理和急症后康复设施。参与者:94名颅内损伤患者,20%为女性,平均年龄45.8岁(SD = 13.6),在tbi后6个月(n = 94)和12个月(n = 91)提供185个完整的FSS-7反应。设计:利用Rasch模型和图形对数线性Rasch模型(GLLRM)对纵向观察研究的数据进行二次分析。主要测量方法:FSS-7是在原FSS基础上删去第1项和第2项的自我报告疲劳测量方法。差异项目功能(DIF)检查性别、年龄、教育程度和睡眠障碍(Epworth嗜睡量表和失眠严重程度指数)。结果:FSS-7不符合Rasch模型,主要是由于第4项拟合差,第5项与第6项之间存在局部依赖。一个包含6个项目的版本(FSS-6),不包括项目4,提供了一个考虑项目5和项目6之间局部依赖性的GLLRM的良好拟合。没有检测到DIF或项目参数随时间的漂移。FSS-6具有良好的信度(r = 0.936),但目标不理想,平均仅达到最大可获得测试信息的57%。结论:FSS-6(不包括第4项)为创伤后6个月和12个月的成年人提供了一种有效的疲劳测量方法,可靠性很高。总原始得分在性别、年龄、教育水平和睡眠障碍中是不变的,在损伤后6至12个月没有项目参数漂移。FSS-6可能对TBI康复和研究中的疲劳筛查和监测有用,尽管建议对未来更大范围患者样本的研究进行重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书