{"title":"Neuro-axonal injury biomarker serum neurofilament light chain is associated with osteoarthritis: a dual-cohort study from NHANES and UK Biobank.","authors":"Mingxuan Liu, Huade Ma, Haidong Zhou, Kangqi Xie, Changtai Luo, Zhonglong He, Zhongxing Ning, Jihua Wei, Dianbo Yu","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2026.2690188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) affects over half a billion people globally, representing a major public health burden. Serum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) has recently been implicated in systemic inflammation and metabolic disorders.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This dual-cohort study analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the UK Biobank. In NHANES, sNFL was measured via a high-sensitivity immunoassay, while in UKB, NfL was quantified using the Olink Explore 3072 proteomics platform. OA was defined by self-report in NHANES, and a combination of self-report and ICD-10 hospital records in UKB. The associations were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression and RCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher sNFL levels were significantly associated with increased OA odds in both cohorts. In fully adjusted models, each 1-unit increase in log-transformed sNFL corresponded to 85% higher odds in NHANES [OR = 1.85, 95% CI: (1.51, 2.23)] and 28% higher odds in UKB [OR = 1.28, 95% CI: (1.21, 1.36)]. Comparing the highest to lowest quartiles, ORs were 4.41 (95% CI: 2.71, 7.13) and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.34, 1.59), respectively (both <i>p</i> for trend <0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated sNFL levels are independently and consistently associated with a higher prevalence of OA across two distinct national cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"633-641"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2026.2690188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) affects over half a billion people globally, representing a major public health burden. Serum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) has recently been implicated in systemic inflammation and metabolic disorders.
Research design and methods: This dual-cohort study analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the UK Biobank. In NHANES, sNFL was measured via a high-sensitivity immunoassay, while in UKB, NfL was quantified using the Olink Explore 3072 proteomics platform. OA was defined by self-report in NHANES, and a combination of self-report and ICD-10 hospital records in UKB. The associations were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression and RCS.
Results: Higher sNFL levels were significantly associated with increased OA odds in both cohorts. In fully adjusted models, each 1-unit increase in log-transformed sNFL corresponded to 85% higher odds in NHANES [OR = 1.85, 95% CI: (1.51, 2.23)] and 28% higher odds in UKB [OR = 1.28, 95% CI: (1.21, 1.36)]. Comparing the highest to lowest quartiles, ORs were 4.41 (95% CI: 2.71, 7.13) and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.34, 1.59), respectively (both p for trend <0.01).
Conclusions: Elevated sNFL levels are independently and consistently associated with a higher prevalence of OA across two distinct national cohorts.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.