Challenges of using AI-based synthetic data in health economics and outcomes research.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Arindam Saha, Zongliang Yue, Surachat Ngorsuraches
{"title":"Challenges of using AI-based synthetic data in health economics and outcomes research.","authors":"Arindam Saha, Zongliang Yue, Surachat Ngorsuraches","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2026.2691184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The growing demand for artificial intelligence (AI)-generated synthetic data (SD) in health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) offers both opportunities and risks. As SD might be used in the near future to inform drug pricing, reimbursement, and policy decisions, a rigorous evaluation of its associated challenges is essential.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This non-systematic narrative review provides a conceptual overview of the generation and application of SD in HEOR, based on targeted searches of PubMed and Google Scholar with priority given to the publications from 2019 onwards. We then identified four interconnected challenges: bias as a foundational upstream driver, the privacy-utility trade-off, the absence of standardized human-in-the-loop evaluation, and underdeveloped regulatory and governance frameworks.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The use of SD might offer opportunities to improve data accessibility; however, its adoption as standalone evidence in healthcare decisions is constrained by the absence of HEOR-specific validation standards, equity-centered evaluation metrics, and regulatory guidance. A structured hybrid ecosystem that integrates SD with real-world evidence, supported by coordinated regulatory frameworks and equity impact assessments, will be the most responsible pathway toward meaningful adoption in HEOR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"567-576"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2026.2691184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The growing demand for artificial intelligence (AI)-generated synthetic data (SD) in health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) offers both opportunities and risks. As SD might be used in the near future to inform drug pricing, reimbursement, and policy decisions, a rigorous evaluation of its associated challenges is essential.

Areas covered: This non-systematic narrative review provides a conceptual overview of the generation and application of SD in HEOR, based on targeted searches of PubMed and Google Scholar with priority given to the publications from 2019 onwards. We then identified four interconnected challenges: bias as a foundational upstream driver, the privacy-utility trade-off, the absence of standardized human-in-the-loop evaluation, and underdeveloped regulatory and governance frameworks.

Expert opinion: The use of SD might offer opportunities to improve data accessibility; however, its adoption as standalone evidence in healthcare decisions is constrained by the absence of HEOR-specific validation standards, equity-centered evaluation metrics, and regulatory guidance. A structured hybrid ecosystem that integrates SD with real-world evidence, supported by coordinated regulatory frameworks and equity impact assessments, will be the most responsible pathway toward meaningful adoption in HEOR.

在卫生经济学和成果研究中使用基于人工智能的合成数据的挑战。
卫生经济学和结果研究(HEOR)对人工智能(AI)生成的合成数据(SD)的需求不断增长,这既带来了机遇,也带来了风险。由于SD可能在不久的将来用于药品定价、报销和政策决策,因此对其相关挑战进行严格评估至关重要。涵盖领域:这篇非系统的叙述性综述基于PubMed和谷歌Scholar的目标搜索,优先考虑2019年以后的出版物,提供了HEOR中SD的生成和应用的概念性概述。然后,我们确定了四个相互关联的挑战:偏见作为基本的上游驱动因素,隐私-效用权衡,缺乏标准化的人在环评估,以及不发达的监管和治理框架。专家意见:SD的使用可能提供改善数据可访问性的机会;然而,由于缺乏heor特定的验证标准、以公平为中心的评估指标和监管指导,将其作为医疗保健决策中的独立证据受到限制。在协调的监管框架和公平影响评估的支持下,一个将可持续发展与现实世界证据相结合的结构化混合生态系统,将是实现HEOR有意义采用的最负责任的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书