Impact of virtual monoenergetic images on the assessability of lower extremity arteries in (Poly-) trauma photon-counting detector CT.

IF 1.2 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Emergency Radiology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-16 DOI:10.1007/s10140-026-02502-1
Daniel Dillinger, Christian Bauer, Hanns L Kaatsch, Achim Neufang, Achim Hagen, Stephan Waldeck, Daniel Overhoff
{"title":"Impact of virtual monoenergetic images on the assessability of lower extremity arteries in (Poly-) trauma photon-counting detector CT.","authors":"Daniel Dillinger, Christian Bauer, Hanns L Kaatsch, Achim Neufang, Achim Hagen, Stephan Waldeck, Daniel Overhoff","doi":"10.1007/s10140-026-02502-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) is state of the art imaging modality in patients after severe trauma. A double-bolus contrast media protocol can be used to combine both arterial and parenchymal contrast in one scan. In case of lower extremity trauma, the CT scans can be extended to include the legs in order to rule out vascular pathologies. Virtual monoenergetic (VME) images derived from a Photon-Counting detector CT (PCDCT) proved to be helpful in vascular diagnostics and could therefore also add information in these extended trauma scans. Aim of this study was to determine the VME reconstructions with sufficient vascular contrast (> 200 Hounsfield Units) and to examine, which VME level has best specificity and sensitivity as well as best subjective vascular visibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective analysis, we identified 34 patients undergoing extended whole-body trauma scans including lower extremities on a PCDCT with pathologies of the lower extremity arteries (extravasation, dissection etc.) and paired them with 34 patients without vascular pathologies. We measured CT values and noise of six vascular segments on energy levels 40 to 190 keV and calculated signal to noise (SNR) and contrast to noise (CNR) ratio. Subjective ratings for vascular visibility were performed on a five point Likert scale and two readers analyzed the images for vascular lesions across four energy levels (40, 70, 90 and 110 keV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CT attenuation was measured above 200 HU below 88 keV in the common femoral artery, below 86 keV in the superficial femoral artery and below 85 keV in the popliteal artery. For the tibial arteries, we found higher CT values above 200 HU at the energy levels below 87 keV. Noise was highest at 40 keV for all energy levels, SNR and CNR for common femoral artery was highest at 40 keV. Sensitivity peaked at 40 keV (78.4%) and showed decreasing values for higher energy levels. Specificity increased with higher keV levels up to 91.7%. 40 keV showed the highest sum of Likert ratings regarding vascular visibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCDCT derived VME reconstructions below 86 keV showed sufficient vascular contrast in extended whole-body trauma scans after double-bolus contrast media administration. Smaller vessel depiction can be hampered by increased noise on lower energy levels resulting in decreased image parameters. Lower energy levels have the potential to improve the detection of vascular pathologies, such as bleeding and vascular occlusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"981-990"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13633378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-026-02502-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography (CT) is state of the art imaging modality in patients after severe trauma. A double-bolus contrast media protocol can be used to combine both arterial and parenchymal contrast in one scan. In case of lower extremity trauma, the CT scans can be extended to include the legs in order to rule out vascular pathologies. Virtual monoenergetic (VME) images derived from a Photon-Counting detector CT (PCDCT) proved to be helpful in vascular diagnostics and could therefore also add information in these extended trauma scans. Aim of this study was to determine the VME reconstructions with sufficient vascular contrast (> 200 Hounsfield Units) and to examine, which VME level has best specificity and sensitivity as well as best subjective vascular visibility.

Methods: In a retrospective analysis, we identified 34 patients undergoing extended whole-body trauma scans including lower extremities on a PCDCT with pathologies of the lower extremity arteries (extravasation, dissection etc.) and paired them with 34 patients without vascular pathologies. We measured CT values and noise of six vascular segments on energy levels 40 to 190 keV and calculated signal to noise (SNR) and contrast to noise (CNR) ratio. Subjective ratings for vascular visibility were performed on a five point Likert scale and two readers analyzed the images for vascular lesions across four energy levels (40, 70, 90 and 110 keV).

Results: CT attenuation was measured above 200 HU below 88 keV in the common femoral artery, below 86 keV in the superficial femoral artery and below 85 keV in the popliteal artery. For the tibial arteries, we found higher CT values above 200 HU at the energy levels below 87 keV. Noise was highest at 40 keV for all energy levels, SNR and CNR for common femoral artery was highest at 40 keV. Sensitivity peaked at 40 keV (78.4%) and showed decreasing values for higher energy levels. Specificity increased with higher keV levels up to 91.7%. 40 keV showed the highest sum of Likert ratings regarding vascular visibility.

Conclusion: PCDCT derived VME reconstructions below 86 keV showed sufficient vascular contrast in extended whole-body trauma scans after double-bolus contrast media administration. Smaller vessel depiction can be hampered by increased noise on lower energy levels resulting in decreased image parameters. Lower energy levels have the potential to improve the detection of vascular pathologies, such as bleeding and vascular occlusions.

虚拟单能图像对(多)创伤光子计数检测器CT下肢动脉可评估性的影响。
背景:计算机断层扫描(CT)是严重创伤后患者最先进的成像方式。双丸造影剂方案可用于在一次扫描中结合动脉和实质造影剂。在下肢创伤的情况下,CT扫描可以扩展到包括腿部,以排除血管病变。来自光子计数检测器CT (PCDCT)的虚拟单能(VME)图像被证明有助于血管诊断,因此也可以在这些扩展的创伤扫描中添加信息。本研究的目的是确定具有足够血管造影剂(> 200 Hounsfield Units)的VME重建,并检查哪个VME水平具有最佳的特异性和敏感性以及最佳的主观血管可见性。方法:回顾性分析,我们选择了34例在PCDCT上进行包括下肢在内的全身创伤扫描的患者,这些患者有下肢动脉病变(外渗、夹层等),并与34例无血管病变的患者配对。测量了40 ~ 190kev能量水平下6条血管段的CT值和噪声,计算了信噪比(SNR)和噪声对比比(CNR)。血管可见性的主观评分是在5分李克特量表上进行的,两名读者分析了四个能量水平(40,70,90和110 keV)的血管病变图像。结果:股总动脉88 keV以下200 HU以上,股浅动脉86 keV以下,腘动脉85 keV以下。对于胫骨动脉,我们发现在能量水平低于87 keV时,200 HU以上的CT值较高。噪声在40 keV时最高,股总动脉的信噪比和CNR在40 keV时最高。灵敏度在40 keV时达到峰值(78.4%),在更高的能量水平上呈下降趋势。特异性随keV水平升高而增加,可达91.7%。40kev显示血管可见性的李克特评分总和最高。结论:给予双剂量造影剂后,PCDCT衍生的VME重建在86 keV以下的扩展全身创伤扫描中显示足够的血管对比度。较小的容器描绘可能会受到较低能量水平上增加的噪声的阻碍,从而导致图像参数降低。较低的能量水平有可能改善血管病变的检测,如出血和血管闭塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Radiology
Emergency Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书