Trajectories of physical fitness following paediatric burn injury: A two-year longitudinal and predictive analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Maged A Basha, Ragab K Elnaggar, Saleh M Aloraini, Feras Alsultan, Amal Alharbi, Ashwaq Alqahtani, Mohamed Maher El-Keblawy, Alshimaa R Azab, FatmaAlzahraa H Kamel
{"title":"Trajectories of physical fitness following paediatric burn injury: A two-year longitudinal and predictive analysis.","authors":"Maged A Basha, Ragab K Elnaggar, Saleh M Aloraini, Feras Alsultan, Amal Alharbi, Ashwaq Alqahtani, Mohamed Maher El-Keblawy, Alshimaa R Azab, FatmaAlzahraa H Kamel","doi":"10.1177/02692155261459618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo analyse physical fitness trajectories in paediatric burn survivors from discharge to 2 years post-injury, compare them with an age- and gender-matched control group, and identify baseline demographic and clinical determinants.DesignProspective and longitudinal cohort study.ParticipantsThe study included participants with burn injuries (burn group, n = 45), aged 10-17 years, with burns involving ≥25% of total body surface area, and an age- and gender-matched group of healthy children (control group, n = 45).Main measuresParticipants underwent standardised fitness assessments at discharge and 24 months later. Health-related physical fitness was quantitatively assessed using the validated EUROFIT physical fitness test battery.ResultsLongitudinal analysis revealed significant improvements in seven of nine fitness domains for participants with burn injuries over two years (pFDR < 0.001). Despite these gains, these participants exhibited persistent fitness deficits compared to healthy controls across all domains at follow-up (all p < 0.001). Among those with burn injuries, greater total body surface area (β = -0.007, p = 0.03) and third-degree burn percentage (β = -0.57, p < 0.001) predicted lower overall fitness, while longer rehabilitation predicted higher fitness (β = 0.50, p < 0.001). No baseline clinical factors significantly predicted the rate of fitness change over time (all interaction p > 0.05).ConclusionPaediatric burn survivors demonstrated significant improvements in physical fitness over 2 years but failed to close the performance gap with their healthy peers. Injury severity and rehabilitation duration were strong determinants of fitness level, but they did not predict the rate of improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155261459618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155261459618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo analyse physical fitness trajectories in paediatric burn survivors from discharge to 2 years post-injury, compare them with an age- and gender-matched control group, and identify baseline demographic and clinical determinants.DesignProspective and longitudinal cohort study.ParticipantsThe study included participants with burn injuries (burn group, n = 45), aged 10-17 years, with burns involving ≥25% of total body surface area, and an age- and gender-matched group of healthy children (control group, n = 45).Main measuresParticipants underwent standardised fitness assessments at discharge and 24 months later. Health-related physical fitness was quantitatively assessed using the validated EUROFIT physical fitness test battery.ResultsLongitudinal analysis revealed significant improvements in seven of nine fitness domains for participants with burn injuries over two years (pFDR < 0.001). Despite these gains, these participants exhibited persistent fitness deficits compared to healthy controls across all domains at follow-up (all p < 0.001). Among those with burn injuries, greater total body surface area (β = -0.007, p = 0.03) and third-degree burn percentage (β = -0.57, p < 0.001) predicted lower overall fitness, while longer rehabilitation predicted higher fitness (β = 0.50, p < 0.001). No baseline clinical factors significantly predicted the rate of fitness change over time (all interaction p > 0.05).ConclusionPaediatric burn survivors demonstrated significant improvements in physical fitness over 2 years but failed to close the performance gap with their healthy peers. Injury severity and rehabilitation duration were strong determinants of fitness level, but they did not predict the rate of improvement.

儿童烧伤后身体健康的轨迹:一项为期两年的纵向和预测分析。
目的分析儿童烧伤幸存者从出院到伤后2年的身体健康轨迹,将其与年龄和性别匹配的对照组进行比较,并确定基线人口统计学和临床决定因素。前瞻性和纵向队列研究。研究对象包括烧伤患者(烧伤组,n = 45),年龄10-17岁,烧伤面积≥25%,以及年龄和性别匹配的健康儿童组(对照组,n = 45)。参与者在出院时和24个月后进行了标准化的健康评估。使用经过验证的EUROFIT体质测试电池对健康相关体质进行定量评估。结果纵向分析显示,烧伤患者在两年内9个健康领域中有7个显著改善(pFDR < 0.001)。尽管取得了这些进展,但在随访中,与健康对照组相比,这些参与者在所有领域都表现出持续的健康缺陷(均p 0.05)。结论儿童烧伤幸存者的体能水平在2年内有显著提高,但与健康同龄人的体能水平差距仍未缩小。损伤严重程度和康复时间是健康水平的重要决定因素,但它们并不能预测改善的速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书