A descriptive study on reading instruction provided to students with intellectual disability who use augmentative and alternative communication.

IF 1.6
Natalina Meuli, Anne-Laure Linder, Anne-Françoise de Chambrier, Catherine Martinet, Rachel Sermier Dessemontet
{"title":"A descriptive study on reading instruction provided to students with intellectual disability who use augmentative and alternative communication.","authors":"Natalina Meuli, Anne-Laure Linder, Anne-Françoise de Chambrier, Catherine Martinet, Rachel Sermier Dessemontet","doi":"10.1080/07434618.2026.2677478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Literacy is crucial for participating in education and society. However, most persons with intellectual disability (ID) who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) enter adulthood without functional literacy skills. Teaching practices may contribute to explain this phenomenon. Reading instruction for these students has scarcely been investigated. It is crucial to learn more about this issue. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 29 teachers working with 35 students with ID who use AAC. Sixty reading lessons were observed, and 28 semi-structured interviews were conducted with the teachers. Approximately half of the students received phonics instruction and phonological awareness training during reading lessons. Listening comprehension and vocabulary instruction were rarely provided. Fewer than a quarter of the students were given nonspoken ways to actively participate in reading instruction. The study's findings underscore the urgent need for in-service training and the development of evidence-based teaching materials to support teachers optimize reading instruction for students with ID who use AAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":520566,"journal":{"name":"Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2026.2677478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Literacy is crucial for participating in education and society. However, most persons with intellectual disability (ID) who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) enter adulthood without functional literacy skills. Teaching practices may contribute to explain this phenomenon. Reading instruction for these students has scarcely been investigated. It is crucial to learn more about this issue. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 29 teachers working with 35 students with ID who use AAC. Sixty reading lessons were observed, and 28 semi-structured interviews were conducted with the teachers. Approximately half of the students received phonics instruction and phonological awareness training during reading lessons. Listening comprehension and vocabulary instruction were rarely provided. Fewer than a quarter of the students were given nonspoken ways to actively participate in reading instruction. The study's findings underscore the urgent need for in-service training and the development of evidence-based teaching materials to support teachers optimize reading instruction for students with ID who use AAC.

运用辅助与替代沟通的智障学生阅读教学之描述性研究。
扫盲对于参与教育和社会至关重要。然而,大多数使用辅助和替代沟通(AAC)的智障人士进入成年后没有功能性读写技能。教学实践可能有助于解释这一现象。对这些学生的阅读指导很少进行调查。了解更多关于这个问题的信息是至关重要的。本研究对29名教师和35名使用AAC的ID学生进行了定性描述性研究。对60节阅读课进行了观察,并对28名教师进行了半结构化访谈。大约一半的学生在阅读课上接受了语音教学和语音意识训练。很少提供听力理解和词汇教学。不到四分之一的学生被给予积极参与阅读教学的非言语方式。研究结果强调了在职培训和开发基于证据的教材的迫切需要,以支持教师优化使用AAC的ID学生的阅读教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书