Preliminary in Vitro Study on an RFID-Tagged Gauze Detection System to Prevent Retention During Laparoscopic Procedures.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jae Kyun Park, Hwan Yi Joo, Dae Hwan Kim, Tae Yong Jeon, Seokyoung Ahn, Chang-In Choi
{"title":"Preliminary in Vitro Study on an RFID-Tagged Gauze Detection System to Prevent Retention During Laparoscopic Procedures.","authors":"Jae Kyun Park, Hwan Yi Joo, Dae Hwan Kim, Tae Yong Jeon, Seokyoung Ahn, Chang-In Choi","doi":"10.1177/15533506261462072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundRetained surgical items (RSIs) represent a significant patient safety concern in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) due to the limitations of conventional detection methods. This study evaluated the technical feasibility of a novel triple-detector radiofrequency identification (RFID) system integrated into a laparoscopic port for automated, real-time tracking and directional differentiation of surgical gauze during procedures.MethodsWe developed a prototype system integrating three RFID detectors (134.2 kHz) longitudinally into a standard 12-mm laparoscopic port. In a controlled laboratory setting, 118 pieces of RFID-tagged gauze were systematically inserted and retrieved through the port, generating 236 events. The study evaluated detection accuracy across outer, middle, and inner channels, alongside directional discrimination capability and temporal tracking performance using a laparoscopic training model.ResultsDetection rates exceeded 99% across all three channels (99.58% for the outer channel and 99.15% for middle and inner channels). Directional differentiation accuracy, based on sequential detection patterns, was 94.92% for insertion and 95.76% for removal. Anomalous patterns (4-5%), such as channel omission or duplicate detection, were observed due to passage speed or angle, but they did not impact the final determination of gauze presence or absence.ConclusionsThis proof-of-concept study demonstrates that an RFID-integrated laparoscopic port can achieve high detection (>99%) and directional accuracy (∼95%). These findings support its technical feasibility as an automated safety mechanism for potentially reducing the risk of RSIs in laparoscopic surgery; however, further validation through animal studies and clinical trials is required to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506261462072"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506261462072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundRetained surgical items (RSIs) represent a significant patient safety concern in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) due to the limitations of conventional detection methods. This study evaluated the technical feasibility of a novel triple-detector radiofrequency identification (RFID) system integrated into a laparoscopic port for automated, real-time tracking and directional differentiation of surgical gauze during procedures.MethodsWe developed a prototype system integrating three RFID detectors (134.2 kHz) longitudinally into a standard 12-mm laparoscopic port. In a controlled laboratory setting, 118 pieces of RFID-tagged gauze were systematically inserted and retrieved through the port, generating 236 events. The study evaluated detection accuracy across outer, middle, and inner channels, alongside directional discrimination capability and temporal tracking performance using a laparoscopic training model.ResultsDetection rates exceeded 99% across all three channels (99.58% for the outer channel and 99.15% for middle and inner channels). Directional differentiation accuracy, based on sequential detection patterns, was 94.92% for insertion and 95.76% for removal. Anomalous patterns (4-5%), such as channel omission or duplicate detection, were observed due to passage speed or angle, but they did not impact the final determination of gauze presence or absence.ConclusionsThis proof-of-concept study demonstrates that an RFID-integrated laparoscopic port can achieve high detection (>99%) and directional accuracy (∼95%). These findings support its technical feasibility as an automated safety mechanism for potentially reducing the risk of RSIs in laparoscopic surgery; however, further validation through animal studies and clinical trials is required to confirm these results.

一种rfid标签纱布检测系统在腹腔镜手术中防止滞留的初步体外研究。
背景:由于传统检测方法的局限性,在微创手术(MIS)中,保留的手术物品(rsi)是一个重要的患者安全问题。本研究评估了一种新型的三探测器射频识别(RFID)系统集成到腹腔镜端口的技术可行性,用于手术过程中手术纱布的自动、实时跟踪和方向区分。方法我们开发了一个原型系统,将三个RFID探测器(134.2 kHz)纵向集成到一个标准的12毫米腹腔镜端口中。在一个受控的实验室环境中,118块带有rfid标签的纱布通过端口被系统地插入和取出,产生236个事件。该研究使用腹腔镜训练模型评估了外部、中间和内部通道的检测精度,以及方向识别能力和时间跟踪性能。结果3个通道的检出率均超过99%,其中外通道为99.58%,中、内通道为99.15%。基于序列检测模式的定向鉴别准确率,插入为94.92%,去除为95.76%。由于通道速度或角度,观察到异常模式(4-5%),例如通道遗漏或重复检测,但它们不影响最终确定纱布存在或不存在。这项概念验证研究表明,集成rfid的腹腔镜端口可以实现高检测(约99%)和方向精度(约95%)。这些发现支持其作为一种自动安全机制的技术可行性,可以潜在地降低腹腔镜手术中rsi的风险;然而,需要通过动物研究和临床试验进一步验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书