Sagittal Alignment as a Determinant of Pain and Functional Recovery after Lumbar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.6 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2026-03-07 eCollection Date: 2026-05-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2025-0388
Tomasz Tykocki, Łukasz Rakasz
{"title":"Sagittal Alignment as a Determinant of Pain and Functional Recovery after Lumbar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Tomasz Tykocki, Łukasz Rakasz","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2025-0388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sagittal alignment is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of functional recovery after lumbar spine surgery; however, its role in degenerative lumbar disease remains variably reported. While alignment principles are well-established in adult spinal deformity, their applicability to routine degenerative procedures has not been quantitatively synthesized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 original clinical studies (1,837 adults) was performed. Eligible studies reported postoperative sagittal or spinopelvic parameters-pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch, sagittal vertical axis, LL, pelvic tilt, or segmental lordosis-and at least one validated clinical outcome (Oswestry Disability Index, visual analogue scale/numerical rating scale, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, EuroQol Five Dimensions, Core Outcome Measures Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association). Continuous data were converted to log-odds ratios (ORs) (Chinn method) to enable unified pooling. Random-effects models were applied for disability and pain outcomes. Subgroup analyses assessed fusion versus decompression, PI-LL versus other alignment metrics, and short-term versus long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies contributed disability outcomes, yielding a pooled OR of 0.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.65), indicating a 67% reduction in the odds of significant postoperative disability in aligned patients. Five studies contributed pain data, producing a pooled OR of 0.39 (95% CI 0.25-0.61), corresponding to a 61% lower likelihood of persistent postoperative pain. Fusion procedures demonstrated stronger alignment-associated benefit (OR 0.34) compared with decompression alone (OR 0.56). PI-LL-based studies showed consistent predictive value (OR 0.48), and the alignment effect increased with long-term follow-up (>12 months; OR ~0.28). Qualitatively, 87% of studies reported positive alignment-outcome associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Restoration of physiological sagittal alignment significantly improves postoperative disability and pain across degenerative lumbar procedures. Alignment correction should be considered a central element of surgical planning in both fusion and decompression.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"10 3","pages":"354-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13255123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2025-0388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sagittal alignment is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of functional recovery after lumbar spine surgery; however, its role in degenerative lumbar disease remains variably reported. While alignment principles are well-established in adult spinal deformity, their applicability to routine degenerative procedures has not been quantitatively synthesized.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 original clinical studies (1,837 adults) was performed. Eligible studies reported postoperative sagittal or spinopelvic parameters-pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch, sagittal vertical axis, LL, pelvic tilt, or segmental lordosis-and at least one validated clinical outcome (Oswestry Disability Index, visual analogue scale/numerical rating scale, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, EuroQol Five Dimensions, Core Outcome Measures Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association). Continuous data were converted to log-odds ratios (ORs) (Chinn method) to enable unified pooling. Random-effects models were applied for disability and pain outcomes. Subgroup analyses assessed fusion versus decompression, PI-LL versus other alignment metrics, and short-term versus long-term follow-up.

Results: Eight studies contributed disability outcomes, yielding a pooled OR of 0.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.65), indicating a 67% reduction in the odds of significant postoperative disability in aligned patients. Five studies contributed pain data, producing a pooled OR of 0.39 (95% CI 0.25-0.61), corresponding to a 61% lower likelihood of persistent postoperative pain. Fusion procedures demonstrated stronger alignment-associated benefit (OR 0.34) compared with decompression alone (OR 0.56). PI-LL-based studies showed consistent predictive value (OR 0.48), and the alignment effect increased with long-term follow-up (>12 months; OR ~0.28). Qualitatively, 87% of studies reported positive alignment-outcome associations.

Conclusion: Restoration of physiological sagittal alignment significantly improves postoperative disability and pain across degenerative lumbar procedures. Alignment correction should be considered a central element of surgical planning in both fusion and decompression.

矢状位对齐作为腰椎手术后疼痛和功能恢复的决定因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:矢状位排列越来越被认为是腰椎手术后功能恢复的关键决定因素;然而,其在退行性腰椎疾病中的作用仍有不同的报道。虽然对准原则在成人脊柱畸形中已经建立,但它们在常规退行性手术中的适用性尚未定量合成。方法:对23项原始临床研究(1837名成人)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。符合条件的研究报告了术后矢状面或脊柱骨盆参数-骨盆发生率(PI)-腰椎前凸(LL)不匹配,矢状垂直轴,LL,骨盆倾斜或节段性前凸-以及至少一个验证的临床结果(Oswestry残疾指数,视觉模拟量表/数值评定量表,12项简短健康调查,EuroQol五个维度,核心结果测量指数,日本骨科协会)。连续数据转换为对数比值比(or) (Chinn方法),以实现统一的池化。残疾和疼痛结果采用随机效应模型。亚组分析评估融合与减压,PI-LL与其他对齐指标,短期随访与长期随访。结果:8项研究提供了残疾结局,汇总OR为0.33(95%可信区间[CI] 0.16-0.65),表明队列患者术后显著残疾的几率降低了67%。5项研究提供了疼痛数据,合并OR为0.39 (95% CI为0.25-0.61),对应于术后持续疼痛的可能性降低61%。与单纯减压(OR 0.56)相比,融合手术显示出更强的对齐相关益处(OR 0.34)。基于pi - ll的研究具有一致的预测价值(OR = 0.48),并且随着长期随访,对齐效果增加(OR = 0.28)。定性地说,87%的研究报告了正的对齐-结果关联。结论:恢复生理矢状位可显著改善腰椎退行性手术的术后残疾和疼痛。在融合术和减压术中,对线矫正应被视为手术计划的中心要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书