{"title":"Sagittal Alignment as a Determinant of Pain and Functional Recovery after Lumbar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Tomasz Tykocki, Łukasz Rakasz","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2025-0388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sagittal alignment is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of functional recovery after lumbar spine surgery; however, its role in degenerative lumbar disease remains variably reported. While alignment principles are well-established in adult spinal deformity, their applicability to routine degenerative procedures has not been quantitatively synthesized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 original clinical studies (1,837 adults) was performed. Eligible studies reported postoperative sagittal or spinopelvic parameters-pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch, sagittal vertical axis, LL, pelvic tilt, or segmental lordosis-and at least one validated clinical outcome (Oswestry Disability Index, visual analogue scale/numerical rating scale, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, EuroQol Five Dimensions, Core Outcome Measures Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association). Continuous data were converted to log-odds ratios (ORs) (Chinn method) to enable unified pooling. Random-effects models were applied for disability and pain outcomes. Subgroup analyses assessed fusion versus decompression, PI-LL versus other alignment metrics, and short-term versus long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies contributed disability outcomes, yielding a pooled OR of 0.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.65), indicating a 67% reduction in the odds of significant postoperative disability in aligned patients. Five studies contributed pain data, producing a pooled OR of 0.39 (95% CI 0.25-0.61), corresponding to a 61% lower likelihood of persistent postoperative pain. Fusion procedures demonstrated stronger alignment-associated benefit (OR 0.34) compared with decompression alone (OR 0.56). PI-LL-based studies showed consistent predictive value (OR 0.48), and the alignment effect increased with long-term follow-up (>12 months; OR ~0.28). Qualitatively, 87% of studies reported positive alignment-outcome associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Restoration of physiological sagittal alignment significantly improves postoperative disability and pain across degenerative lumbar procedures. Alignment correction should be considered a central element of surgical planning in both fusion and decompression.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"10 3","pages":"354-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13255123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2025-0388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sagittal alignment is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of functional recovery after lumbar spine surgery; however, its role in degenerative lumbar disease remains variably reported. While alignment principles are well-established in adult spinal deformity, their applicability to routine degenerative procedures has not been quantitatively synthesized.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 original clinical studies (1,837 adults) was performed. Eligible studies reported postoperative sagittal or spinopelvic parameters-pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch, sagittal vertical axis, LL, pelvic tilt, or segmental lordosis-and at least one validated clinical outcome (Oswestry Disability Index, visual analogue scale/numerical rating scale, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, EuroQol Five Dimensions, Core Outcome Measures Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association). Continuous data were converted to log-odds ratios (ORs) (Chinn method) to enable unified pooling. Random-effects models were applied for disability and pain outcomes. Subgroup analyses assessed fusion versus decompression, PI-LL versus other alignment metrics, and short-term versus long-term follow-up.
Results: Eight studies contributed disability outcomes, yielding a pooled OR of 0.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.65), indicating a 67% reduction in the odds of significant postoperative disability in aligned patients. Five studies contributed pain data, producing a pooled OR of 0.39 (95% CI 0.25-0.61), corresponding to a 61% lower likelihood of persistent postoperative pain. Fusion procedures demonstrated stronger alignment-associated benefit (OR 0.34) compared with decompression alone (OR 0.56). PI-LL-based studies showed consistent predictive value (OR 0.48), and the alignment effect increased with long-term follow-up (>12 months; OR ~0.28). Qualitatively, 87% of studies reported positive alignment-outcome associations.
Conclusion: Restoration of physiological sagittal alignment significantly improves postoperative disability and pain across degenerative lumbar procedures. Alignment correction should be considered a central element of surgical planning in both fusion and decompression.