Practical Strategies for Bone Graft Selection in Spinal Fusion: A Narrative Review with Regional Perspectives.

IF 1.6 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2025-12-10 eCollection Date: 2026-05-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2025-0297
Masashi Miyazaki, Tetsutaro Abe, Noriaki Sako, Nobuhiro Kaku
{"title":"Practical Strategies for Bone Graft Selection in Spinal Fusion: A Narrative Review with Regional Perspectives.","authors":"Masashi Miyazaki, Tetsutaro Abe, Noriaki Sako, Nobuhiro Kaku","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2025-0297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Successful spinal fusion depends on achieving reliable arthrodesis, and bone graft selection is a critical determinant of outcomes. Although autologous iliac crest bone graft remains the biological gold standard, limitations such as donor-site morbidity and insufficient volume have prompted the use of alternatives, including allograft, demineralized bone matrix (DBM), hydroxyapatite, and β-tricalcium phosphate. The introduction of biologics-such as recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and cell- or peptide-based constructs-has further expanded grafting options internationally. However, in Japan, the clinical use of biologics remains unapproved, and allograft availability is restricted, necessitating reliance on autograft, DBM, and ceramic substitutes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review of recent clinical and experimental studies was conducted, emphasizing graft performance across cervical, lumbar, anterior/lateral, multilevel, and minimally invasive procedures. Practical considerations, including cost, storage, supply stability, and regional regulatory constraints, were integrated into the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Graft performance varied substantially according to surgical context. DBM and ceramic grafts often achieved satisfactory outcomes in cervical fusion, whereas lumbar fusion required mechanically robust extenders. Multilevel and deformity correction surgeries demanded blended strategies, while minimally invasive procedures benefited from moldable DBM and granular ceramics. Cost-effectiveness and logistical feasibility strongly influenced material selection. In Japan, the lack of rhBMP-2 approval and limited bone bank infrastructure further constrained options, reinforcing pragmatic combinations such as \"autograft plus ceramics\" or \"DBM plus ceramics.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No single graft material is universally optimal. Reliable spinal fusion requires context-specific selection and combination strategies tailored to biological, mechanical, and regional factors. In Japan, strengthening bone bank systems and establishing robust domestic clinical evidence are essential. Future integration of regenerative grafts and next-generation biomaterials will require careful regulatory adaptation and cost-effectiveness validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"10 3","pages":"322-330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13255119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2025-0297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Successful spinal fusion depends on achieving reliable arthrodesis, and bone graft selection is a critical determinant of outcomes. Although autologous iliac crest bone graft remains the biological gold standard, limitations such as donor-site morbidity and insufficient volume have prompted the use of alternatives, including allograft, demineralized bone matrix (DBM), hydroxyapatite, and β-tricalcium phosphate. The introduction of biologics-such as recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and cell- or peptide-based constructs-has further expanded grafting options internationally. However, in Japan, the clinical use of biologics remains unapproved, and allograft availability is restricted, necessitating reliance on autograft, DBM, and ceramic substitutes.

Methods: A narrative review of recent clinical and experimental studies was conducted, emphasizing graft performance across cervical, lumbar, anterior/lateral, multilevel, and minimally invasive procedures. Practical considerations, including cost, storage, supply stability, and regional regulatory constraints, were integrated into the analysis.

Results: Graft performance varied substantially according to surgical context. DBM and ceramic grafts often achieved satisfactory outcomes in cervical fusion, whereas lumbar fusion required mechanically robust extenders. Multilevel and deformity correction surgeries demanded blended strategies, while minimally invasive procedures benefited from moldable DBM and granular ceramics. Cost-effectiveness and logistical feasibility strongly influenced material selection. In Japan, the lack of rhBMP-2 approval and limited bone bank infrastructure further constrained options, reinforcing pragmatic combinations such as "autograft plus ceramics" or "DBM plus ceramics."

Conclusions: No single graft material is universally optimal. Reliable spinal fusion requires context-specific selection and combination strategies tailored to biological, mechanical, and regional factors. In Japan, strengthening bone bank systems and establishing robust domestic clinical evidence are essential. Future integration of regenerative grafts and next-generation biomaterials will require careful regulatory adaptation and cost-effectiveness validation.

脊柱融合术中骨移植物选择的实用策略:区域视角的叙事回顾。
成功的脊柱融合依赖于可靠的关节融合术,骨移植物的选择是结果的关键决定因素。尽管自体髂骨骨移植仍然是生物学上的金标准,但诸如供体部位发病率和体积不足等限制促使人们使用其他替代品,包括同种异体骨移植、脱矿骨基质(DBM)、羟基磷灰石和β-磷酸三钙。生物制剂的引入,如重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2 (rhBMP-2)和基于细胞或肽的结构,进一步扩大了国际上的嫁接选择。然而,在日本,生物制剂的临床应用仍然未获批准,同种异体移植物的可用性受到限制,需要依赖自体移植物、DBM和陶瓷替代品。方法:对近期的临床和实验研究进行叙述性回顾,强调跨越颈椎、腰椎、前/外侧、多节段和微创手术的移植物性能。实际考虑因素,包括成本、储存、供应稳定性和区域监管约束,都被整合到分析中。结果:移植物的表现根据手术情况有很大的不同。DBM和陶瓷移植物通常在颈椎融合中获得满意的结果,而腰椎融合需要机械坚固的扩展器。多节段和畸形矫正手术需要混合策略,而微创手术得益于可塑DBM和颗粒陶瓷。成本效益和物流可行性强烈影响材料的选择。在日本,缺乏rhBMP-2的批准和有限的骨库基础设施进一步限制了选择,加强了务实的组合,如“自体移植+陶瓷”或“DBM +陶瓷”。结论:没有单一的移植材料是普遍最佳的。可靠的脊柱融合术需要根据生物、机械和区域因素进行选择和组合。在日本,加强骨库系统和建立强有力的国内临床证据至关重要。再生移植物和下一代生物材料的未来整合将需要仔细的监管适应和成本效益验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书