Interpretable Machine Learning in Heavy Metal-Associated Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease: A Review of Current Methodologies, Toxicological Insights, and Clinical Implications.
Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Amal A Alsubaiei, Najat Y AlSejari, Mohanad A Alkuwaiti, Bayan Mahafdah, Hamza A Abdul-Hafez, Ahmed Elmorsy Mohamed, Ahmed W Hageen, Abdullah M Alharran, Giuseppe Andò, Wilbert S Aronow
{"title":"Interpretable Machine Learning in Heavy Metal-Associated Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease: A Review of Current Methodologies, Toxicological Insights, and Clinical Implications.","authors":"Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Amal A Alsubaiei, Najat Y AlSejari, Mohanad A Alkuwaiti, Bayan Mahafdah, Hamza A Abdul-Hafez, Ahmed Elmorsy Mohamed, Ahmed W Hageen, Abdullah M Alharran, Giuseppe Andò, Wilbert S Aronow","doi":"10.1007/s12012-026-10142-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heavy metals, including lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), and mercury (Hg), are pervasive environmental toxicants increasingly recognized as nontraditional contributors to cardiovascular and cardiometabolic disease. Large-scale epidemiology and mechanistic studies link chronic low-to-moderate exposure to hypertension, atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, heart failure (HF), and premature cardiovascular mortality. Concurrently, exposure science has shifted from single-pollutant models to high-dimensional \"exposome\" frameworks that must address correlated mixtures, non-linear dose-response, and subgroup heterogeneity. Machine learning (ML) methods can; learn these complex patterns, but clinical and policy translation requires interpretability: understanding which metals drive risk, how risk changes across exposure ranges, and where interactions amplify harm. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary interpretable ML approaches as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), partial dependence tools, Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR), and mixture-caausal methods, with toxicological mechanisms and clinically relevant outcomes. We integrate evidence from recent NHANES analyses, electronic medical record (EMR) mining, and the All of Us Research Program, highlighting a consistent ML-derived hierarchy wherein cadmium and lead frequently reported as dominant risk drivers for cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes and mortality prediction improvements when metal biomarkers augment standard risk models. We discuss current limitations, cross-sectional designs, residual confounding, measurement error, and variability in model development, and propose a future research agenda highlighting longitudinal cohorts, standardized reporting, causal validation, and integration of omics and real-time exposure monitoring to enable personalized environmental prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9570,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Toxicology","volume":"26 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12012-026-10142-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Heavy metals, including lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), and mercury (Hg), are pervasive environmental toxicants increasingly recognized as nontraditional contributors to cardiovascular and cardiometabolic disease. Large-scale epidemiology and mechanistic studies link chronic low-to-moderate exposure to hypertension, atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, heart failure (HF), and premature cardiovascular mortality. Concurrently, exposure science has shifted from single-pollutant models to high-dimensional "exposome" frameworks that must address correlated mixtures, non-linear dose-response, and subgroup heterogeneity. Machine learning (ML) methods can; learn these complex patterns, but clinical and policy translation requires interpretability: understanding which metals drive risk, how risk changes across exposure ranges, and where interactions amplify harm. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary interpretable ML approaches as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), partial dependence tools, Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR), and mixture-caausal methods, with toxicological mechanisms and clinically relevant outcomes. We integrate evidence from recent NHANES analyses, electronic medical record (EMR) mining, and the All of Us Research Program, highlighting a consistent ML-derived hierarchy wherein cadmium and lead frequently reported as dominant risk drivers for cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes and mortality prediction improvements when metal biomarkers augment standard risk models. We discuss current limitations, cross-sectional designs, residual confounding, measurement error, and variability in model development, and propose a future research agenda highlighting longitudinal cohorts, standardized reporting, causal validation, and integration of omics and real-time exposure monitoring to enable personalized environmental prevention.
期刊介绍:
Cardiovascular Toxicology is the only journal dedicated to publishing contemporary issues, timely reviews, and experimental and clinical data on toxicological aspects of cardiovascular disease. CT publishes papers that will elucidate the effects, molecular mechanisms, and signaling pathways of environmental toxicants on the cardiovascular system. Also covered are the detrimental effects of new cardiovascular drugs, and cardiovascular effects of non-cardiovascular drugs, anti-cancer chemotherapy, and gene therapy. In addition, Cardiovascular Toxicology reports safety and toxicological data on new cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular drugs.