Accuracy and Reliability of AI Models in Emergency Myocardial Infarction Education.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emergency Medicine International Pub Date : 2026-06-13 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/emmi/5530861
İbrahim Korkmaz
{"title":"Accuracy and Reliability of AI Models in Emergency Myocardial Infarction Education.","authors":"İbrahim Korkmaz","doi":"10.1155/emmi/5530861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major global cause of morbidity and mortality. Large language models (LLMs) are emerging tools for patient education. This study evaluated the performance of three LLMs in delivering accurate, reliable, and readable educational content regarding AMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study (February-March 2025), a clinical case of a patient with an inferior STEMI ECG was presented to three LLMs: ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, and Gemini Advanced 2.0 Flash. Each model answered 30 patient-focused questions across three domains: general disease knowledge, diagnostic processes, and treatment approaches. Responses were assessed by four emergency medicine associate professors (10-20 years of experience) using a 5-point Likert scale for accuracy, DISCERN and EQIP tools for reliability and quality, and standard readability indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT-4o achieved the highest accuracy score (4.38 ± 0.38), followed by Claude 3.7 (4.09 ± 0.55) and Gemini 2.0 (3.92 ± 0.41) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). ChatGPT-4o performed significantly better in general information (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and diagnostics (<i>p</i> = 0.009), while Claude 3.7 excelled in treatment-related content (<i>p</i> = 0.015). Claude 3.7 produced significantly more readable responses than both ChatGPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 across all indices (Flesch-Kincaid, <i>p</i> = 0.002, Gunning Fog, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001, Coleman-Liau, <i>p</i> = 0.003). ChatGPT-4o scored \"excellent\" on the DISCERN scale; all models were rated as \"good quality with minor shortcomings\" on EQIP. Reliability scores did not differ significantly (DISCERN, <i>p</i> = 0.188; EQIP, <i>p</i> = 0.935).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLMs show promise in supporting patient education on AMI. While ChatGPT-4o offers superior accuracy and reliability, Claude 3.7 enhances accessibility through clearer language. This is the first study comparing three LLMs for AMI education in an emergency context, underscoring that physician oversight remains essential for educational applications in emergency medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":"2026 ","pages":"5530861"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13263638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/emmi/5530861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major global cause of morbidity and mortality. Large language models (LLMs) are emerging tools for patient education. This study evaluated the performance of three LLMs in delivering accurate, reliable, and readable educational content regarding AMI.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study (February-March 2025), a clinical case of a patient with an inferior STEMI ECG was presented to three LLMs: ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, and Gemini Advanced 2.0 Flash. Each model answered 30 patient-focused questions across three domains: general disease knowledge, diagnostic processes, and treatment approaches. Responses were assessed by four emergency medicine associate professors (10-20 years of experience) using a 5-point Likert scale for accuracy, DISCERN and EQIP tools for reliability and quality, and standard readability indices.

Results: ChatGPT-4o achieved the highest accuracy score (4.38 ± 0.38), followed by Claude 3.7 (4.09 ± 0.55) and Gemini 2.0 (3.92 ± 0.41) (p < 0.001). ChatGPT-4o performed significantly better in general information (p = 0.002) and diagnostics (p = 0.009), while Claude 3.7 excelled in treatment-related content (p = 0.015). Claude 3.7 produced significantly more readable responses than both ChatGPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 across all indices (Flesch-Kincaid, p = 0.002, Gunning Fog, p ≤ 0.001, Coleman-Liau, p = 0.003). ChatGPT-4o scored "excellent" on the DISCERN scale; all models were rated as "good quality with minor shortcomings" on EQIP. Reliability scores did not differ significantly (DISCERN, p = 0.188; EQIP, p = 0.935).

Conclusions: LLMs show promise in supporting patient education on AMI. While ChatGPT-4o offers superior accuracy and reliability, Claude 3.7 enhances accessibility through clearer language. This is the first study comparing three LLMs for AMI education in an emergency context, underscoring that physician oversight remains essential for educational applications in emergency medicine.

人工智能模型在急诊心肌梗死教育中的准确性和可靠性。
背景:急性心肌梗死(AMI)是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。大型语言模型(llm)是患者教育的新兴工具。本研究评估了三位法学硕士在提供准确、可靠和可读的AMI教育内容方面的表现。方法:在这项横断面研究中(2025年2月至3月),一名STEMI心电图较差的患者临床病例被提交给三个LLMs: chatgpt - 40, Claude 3.7 Sonnet和Gemini Advanced 2.0 Flash。每个模型回答了30个以患者为中心的问题,涉及三个领域:一般疾病知识、诊断过程和治疗方法。调查结果由四名急诊医学副教授(10-20年经验)评估,使用5点李克特量表评估准确性,使用DISCERN和EQIP工具评估可靠性和质量,以及标准可读性指标。结果:chatgpt - 40准确率最高(4.38±0.38)分,Claude评分为3.7(4.09±0.55)分,Gemini评分为2.0(3.92±0.41)分(p < 0.001)。chatgpt - 40在一般信息(p = 0.002)和诊断(p = 0.009)方面表现明显更好,而Claude 3.7在治疗相关内容方面表现出色(p = 0.015)。在所有指标上,Claude 3.7比chatgpt - 40和Gemini 2.0的可读性更高(Flesch-Kincaid, p = 0.002, Gunning Fog, p≤0.001,Coleman-Liau, p = 0.003)。chatgpt - 40在DISCERN量表上得分为“优秀”;所有型号在EQIP上都被评为“质量好,缺点小”。信度评分无显著差异(DISCERN, p = 0.188; EQIP, p = 0.935)。结论:法学硕士在支持AMI患者教育方面表现出良好的前景。chatgpt - 40提供了卓越的准确性和可靠性,克劳德3.7通过更清晰的语言增强了可访问性。这是第一项比较急诊背景下AMI教育的三位法学硕士的研究,强调医生监督对于急诊医学教育应用仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书