Impacts of inhibitors on soil N2O emissions and crop yield: A mega-analysis

IF 4.8 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Faisal Hayat , Avedananda Ray , Lovish Kasrija , Maazeera Fatima , Dafeng Hui
{"title":"Impacts of inhibitors on soil N2O emissions and crop yield: A mega-analysis","authors":"Faisal Hayat ,&nbsp;Avedananda Ray ,&nbsp;Lovish Kasrija ,&nbsp;Maazeera Fatima ,&nbsp;Dafeng Hui","doi":"10.1016/j.crsust.2026.100363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A central challenge for agriculture is to secure global food supplies while minimizing its environmental impact, with a focus on greenhouse gas emissions. The use of Nitrogen (N) fertilizers is vital for crop yield; however, they are a major source of soil nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), which is a powerful greenhouse gas. To mitigate soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, nitrification inhibitor (NI), urease inhibitor (UI), and double inhibitor (DI) have been recommended. However, field experiments and existing meta-analyses show conflicting results regarding their impacts on both crop yield and mitigation efficacy, due to differences in study selections and inclusion criteria, variation in handling of moderators and heterogeneity, and statistical model choices. To resolve these discrepancies, we conducted a mega-analysis, synthesizing data from ten meta-analyses on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and nine on crop yield. Our results show that, overall, inhibitors had a significant and positive effect on crop yields (4.6%), although the magnitude of this effect varied by crop type. Conversely, inhibitors caused a strong and highly significant decrease in N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from soil by 42.9%. This mitigation effect was consistent across inhibitor types, products, and management practices. However, soil characteristics and farming practices had a major influence on both yield and N₂O responses. N<sub>2</sub>O mitigation was most noticeable in acidic soils and when inhibitors were banded with fertilizer, and yield increases were noteworthy for cereals. This mega-analysis confirms that agricultural inhibitors are a potent climate-smart strategy that can significantly reduce N<sub>2</sub>O emissions without compromising crop productivity, offering a more thorough quantification than individual meta-analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34472,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100363"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049026000319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A central challenge for agriculture is to secure global food supplies while minimizing its environmental impact, with a focus on greenhouse gas emissions. The use of Nitrogen (N) fertilizers is vital for crop yield; however, they are a major source of soil nitrous oxide (N2O), which is a powerful greenhouse gas. To mitigate soil N2O emissions, nitrification inhibitor (NI), urease inhibitor (UI), and double inhibitor (DI) have been recommended. However, field experiments and existing meta-analyses show conflicting results regarding their impacts on both crop yield and mitigation efficacy, due to differences in study selections and inclusion criteria, variation in handling of moderators and heterogeneity, and statistical model choices. To resolve these discrepancies, we conducted a mega-analysis, synthesizing data from ten meta-analyses on N2O emissions and nine on crop yield. Our results show that, overall, inhibitors had a significant and positive effect on crop yields (4.6%), although the magnitude of this effect varied by crop type. Conversely, inhibitors caused a strong and highly significant decrease in N2O emissions from soil by 42.9%. This mitigation effect was consistent across inhibitor types, products, and management practices. However, soil characteristics and farming practices had a major influence on both yield and N₂O responses. N2O mitigation was most noticeable in acidic soils and when inhibitors were banded with fertilizer, and yield increases were noteworthy for cereals. This mega-analysis confirms that agricultural inhibitors are a potent climate-smart strategy that can significantly reduce N2O emissions without compromising crop productivity, offering a more thorough quantification than individual meta-analyses.

Abstract Image

抑制剂对土壤N2O排放和作物产量的影响:大型分析
农业面临的一个核心挑战是确保全球粮食供应,同时尽量减少其对环境的影响,重点是温室气体排放。氮肥的使用对作物产量至关重要;然而,它们是土壤一氧化二氮(N2O)的主要来源,这是一种强大的温室气体。为了减少土壤N2O的排放,建议使用硝化抑制剂(NI)、脲酶抑制剂(UI)和双重抑制剂(DI)。然而,田间试验和现有的荟萃分析显示,由于研究选择和纳入标准的差异、调节因子和异质性处理的差异以及统计模型的选择,它们对作物产量和缓解效果的影响结果相互矛盾。为了解决这些差异,我们进行了一项大型分析,综合了10项关于一氧化二氮排放的荟萃分析和9项关于作物产量的荟萃分析的数据。我们的研究结果表明,总体而言,抑制剂对作物产量有显著的积极影响(4.6%),尽管这种影响的程度因作物类型而异。相反,抑制剂使土壤N2O排放量显著减少42.9%。这种缓解效果在抑制剂类型、产品和管理实践中是一致的。然而,土壤特征和耕作方式对产量和N₂O响应都有主要影响。在酸性土壤中,当抑制剂与肥料带状施用时,N2O的缓解效果最为显著,谷物产量的增加也很显著。这项大型分析证实,农业抑制剂是一种有效的气候智能策略,可以在不影响作物生产力的情况下显著减少一氧化二氮的排放,提供比单个荟萃分析更彻底的量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
95 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书