A Qualitative Exploration of Community-Based Perinatal Health Provider Perspectives About Patient Perinatal Care Experiences: In Their Own Words.

IF 2.3
Tanika Eaves, Jennifer Dealy, Nicoletta Pellogrino, Elise Palumbo, Janelle Franklin, Grace Nieczezeweski
{"title":"A Qualitative Exploration of Community-Based Perinatal Health Provider Perspectives About Patient Perinatal Care Experiences: In Their Own Words.","authors":"Tanika Eaves, Jennifer Dealy, Nicoletta Pellogrino, Elise Palumbo, Janelle Franklin, Grace Nieczezeweski","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.70144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mistreatment and disrespect in maternity care are a global human rights issue. Patients in maternity care from racialized groups, including Black, Indigenous, and Persons of Color (BIPOC), are more likely to report mistreatment and disrespect and suffer disproportionately from maternal mortality and perinatal complications. Community-based perinatal health and mental health providers may provide unique insight into the experiences of BIPOC birthing persons with implications for enhancing respectful maternity care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Focus group interviews were used to canvass 16 community-based perinatal health and mental health care providers about their experiences providing care for expectant, birthing, and early parenting BIPOC families.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings derived from qualitative coding informed by a grounded theory approach revealed 4 central themes: patient marginalization in health care settings, cultural mismatch within the perinatal workforce, barriers in patient education and care-seeking, and limited interprofessional awareness and collaboration.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A respectful maternity care approach to practice with interprofessional collaboration at its core is proposed as a best practice framework to address the sharp racial inequities in perinatal care experiences, including patient-provider communication, perinatal care-seeking behaviors, and maternal-infant health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.70144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mistreatment and disrespect in maternity care are a global human rights issue. Patients in maternity care from racialized groups, including Black, Indigenous, and Persons of Color (BIPOC), are more likely to report mistreatment and disrespect and suffer disproportionately from maternal mortality and perinatal complications. Community-based perinatal health and mental health providers may provide unique insight into the experiences of BIPOC birthing persons with implications for enhancing respectful maternity care.

Methods: Focus group interviews were used to canvass 16 community-based perinatal health and mental health care providers about their experiences providing care for expectant, birthing, and early parenting BIPOC families.

Results: Findings derived from qualitative coding informed by a grounded theory approach revealed 4 central themes: patient marginalization in health care settings, cultural mismatch within the perinatal workforce, barriers in patient education and care-seeking, and limited interprofessional awareness and collaboration.

Discussion: A respectful maternity care approach to practice with interprofessional collaboration at its core is proposed as a best practice framework to address the sharp racial inequities in perinatal care experiences, including patient-provider communication, perinatal care-seeking behaviors, and maternal-infant health outcomes.

社区围产期保健提供者对患者围产期护理经验的定性探讨:用他们自己的话。
导言:产妇护理中的虐待和不尊重是一个全球性的人权问题。在产科护理中,来自种族化群体的患者,包括黑人、土著和有色人种(BIPOC),更有可能报告受到虐待和不尊重,并遭受不成比例的孕产妇死亡率和围产期并发症。以社区为基础的围产期保健和精神保健提供者可以对BIPOC分娩者的经历提供独特的见解,这对加强尊重产妇护理具有影响。方法:采用焦点小组访谈法对16个社区围产期卫生和心理卫生保健提供者进行调查,了解他们为孕妇、分娩和早期养育BIPOC家庭提供护理的经验。结果:根据扎根理论方法得出的定性编码结果揭示了4个中心主题:卫生保健环境中的患者边缘化、围产期工作人员的文化不匹配、患者教育和求医障碍、有限的跨专业意识和合作。讨论:一种以专业间合作为核心的尊重产科护理方法,作为解决围产期护理经验中尖锐的种族不平等问题的最佳实践框架,包括患者-提供者沟通、围产期护理寻求行为和母婴健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书