Diagnostic Efficacy and Spatial Factors of Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiobiopsy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Comparative Analysis of Hilar Versus Distal Obstruction.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Qingfan Hao, Xue Cai
{"title":"Diagnostic Efficacy and Spatial Factors of Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiobiopsy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Comparative Analysis of Hilar Versus Distal Obstruction.","authors":"Qingfan Hao, Xue Cai","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the clinical application value of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTCD) combined with intraductal forceps biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) and to analyze the mechanisms by which obstruction site and sampling quantity influence diagnostic efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 47 patients with MBO who underwent PTCD combined with intraductal biopsy. The cohort was stratified into a hilar group (n=27) and a distal group (n=20). The study focused on evaluating the impact of sampling quantity and biochemical markers while comparing the characteristics of the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The technical success rate of the procedure was 100%. The overall pathologic diagnostic sensitivity was 85.1% (40/47). The biopsy positivity rate in the distal group (90.0%) was numerically slightly higher than that in the hilar group (81.5%), although the difference was not statistically significant ( P =0.682). In contrast, the median number of samples in the confirmed positive group was significantly higher than that in the negative/indeterminate group ( P =0.005). Furthermore, the postoperative complication rate was only 6.38%, with no severe adverse events reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PTCD combined with intraductal forceps biopsy is a safe and effective diagnostic method. Although the difference between obstruction sites was not statistically significant, this study demonstrates that increasing sampling quantity is crucial for diagnosis. Obtaining at least 3 to 4 samples through multipoint sampling is recommended to ensure high diagnostic rates across different obstruction sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to explore the clinical application value of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTCD) combined with intraductal forceps biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) and to analyze the mechanisms by which obstruction site and sampling quantity influence diagnostic efficacy.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 47 patients with MBO who underwent PTCD combined with intraductal biopsy. The cohort was stratified into a hilar group (n=27) and a distal group (n=20). The study focused on evaluating the impact of sampling quantity and biochemical markers while comparing the characteristics of the 2 groups.

Results: The technical success rate of the procedure was 100%. The overall pathologic diagnostic sensitivity was 85.1% (40/47). The biopsy positivity rate in the distal group (90.0%) was numerically slightly higher than that in the hilar group (81.5%), although the difference was not statistically significant ( P =0.682). In contrast, the median number of samples in the confirmed positive group was significantly higher than that in the negative/indeterminate group ( P =0.005). Furthermore, the postoperative complication rate was only 6.38%, with no severe adverse events reported.

Conclusions: PTCD combined with intraductal forceps biopsy is a safe and effective diagnostic method. Although the difference between obstruction sites was not statistically significant, this study demonstrates that increasing sampling quantity is crucial for diagnosis. Obtaining at least 3 to 4 samples through multipoint sampling is recommended to ensure high diagnostic rates across different obstruction sites.

经皮经肝胆管活检诊断恶性胆道梗阻的疗效及空间因素:肝门部梗阻与远端梗阻的比较分析。
背景:本研究旨在探讨经皮经肝胆道引流术(PTCD)联合导管内钳活检在恶性胆道梗阻(MBO)诊断中的临床应用价值,并分析梗阻部位和取样量影响诊断效果的机制。方法:回顾性分析47例MBO患者行PTCD联合导管内活检的临床资料。该队列被分为门端组(n=27)和远端组(n=20)。研究的重点是评估采样数量和生化指标的影响,同时比较两组的特征。结果:手术技术成功率100%。总体病理诊断敏感性为85.1%(40/47)。远端组活检阳性率(90.0%)略高于门侧组(81.5%),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.682)。而确诊阳性组的样本中位数明显高于阴性/不确定组(P=0.005)。术后并发症发生率仅为6.38%,无严重不良事件报道。结论:PTCD联合导管内钳活检是一种安全有效的诊断方法。虽然阻塞部位之间的差异没有统计学意义,但本研究表明增加采样数量对诊断至关重要。建议通过多点采样获得至少3至4个样本,以确保不同阻塞部位的高诊断率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书