Suitable Grain Size for Distinguishing Mainstem and Tributary Gravelly Deposits in Riverbeds and Terraces Using Roundness Image Analysis

IF 0.8 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Island Arc Pub Date : 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1111/iar.70051
Atsushi Taya, Takayuki Takahashi, Daisuke Ishimura, Masaki Yamada
{"title":"Suitable Grain Size for Distinguishing Mainstem and Tributary Gravelly Deposits in Riverbeds and Terraces Using Roundness Image Analysis","authors":"Atsushi Taya,&nbsp;Takayuki Takahashi,&nbsp;Daisuke Ishimura,&nbsp;Masaki Yamada","doi":"10.1111/iar.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Roundness of gravel particles is widely used as an indicator of sediment transport, yet its potential for discriminating provenance between mainstem and tributary rivers has not been fully tested. In this study, we applied an image-analysis-based roundness measurement (Rgrains) to gravel samples from mainstem and tributary deposits in the Tama and Doushi river basins in central Japan. We used both modern riverbed sediments and terrace deposits across four grain-size fractions (2–4, 4–8, 8–16, and 16–32 mm) to examine suitable grain sizes for distinguishing mainstem and tributary deposits. The results suggest that terrace gravel clasts may be distinguished between mainstem and tributary sources by comparing their roundness distributions with those of modern riverbed sediments. Mainstem sediments consistently exhibited higher roundness than tributary sediments, whereas tributary deposits showed statistical characteristics biased toward specific roundness values, reflecting the restricted nature of their catchments and channels. The minimum grain size required for identification depended on the tributary gradient: in steep-gradient tributaries dominated by debris flows, clear differences were observed even in fine fractions (2–4 and 4–8 mm), whereas coarser fractions (16–32 mm) were generally required for low-gradient tributaries dominated by bedload transport. Furthermore, fluvial transport processes inferred from riverbed slopes appear to exert a stronger influence on clast roundness than lithology, which plays a relatively minor role. The roundness of terrace gravel clasts may preserve information on tributary gradients and transport modes at the time of deposition, and comparison with modern riverbed gravel clasts suggests that past tributary gradients may be reconstructed. These findings suggest that quantitative roundness analysis provides a useful approach for linking terrace gravel clasts to their provenance, offering insights into fluvial terrace development and sediment transport in mountainous rivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14791,"journal":{"name":"Island Arc","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iar.70051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Island Arc","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iar.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roundness of gravel particles is widely used as an indicator of sediment transport, yet its potential for discriminating provenance between mainstem and tributary rivers has not been fully tested. In this study, we applied an image-analysis-based roundness measurement (Rgrains) to gravel samples from mainstem and tributary deposits in the Tama and Doushi river basins in central Japan. We used both modern riverbed sediments and terrace deposits across four grain-size fractions (2–4, 4–8, 8–16, and 16–32 mm) to examine suitable grain sizes for distinguishing mainstem and tributary deposits. The results suggest that terrace gravel clasts may be distinguished between mainstem and tributary sources by comparing their roundness distributions with those of modern riverbed sediments. Mainstem sediments consistently exhibited higher roundness than tributary sediments, whereas tributary deposits showed statistical characteristics biased toward specific roundness values, reflecting the restricted nature of their catchments and channels. The minimum grain size required for identification depended on the tributary gradient: in steep-gradient tributaries dominated by debris flows, clear differences were observed even in fine fractions (2–4 and 4–8 mm), whereas coarser fractions (16–32 mm) were generally required for low-gradient tributaries dominated by bedload transport. Furthermore, fluvial transport processes inferred from riverbed slopes appear to exert a stronger influence on clast roundness than lithology, which plays a relatively minor role. The roundness of terrace gravel clasts may preserve information on tributary gradients and transport modes at the time of deposition, and comparison with modern riverbed gravel clasts suggests that past tributary gradients may be reconstructed. These findings suggest that quantitative roundness analysis provides a useful approach for linking terrace gravel clasts to their provenance, offering insights into fluvial terrace development and sediment transport in mountainous rivers.

Abstract Image

利用圆度图像分析识别河床和阶地主、支流砾石沉积物的合适粒度
砾石颗粒的圆度被广泛用作泥沙输运的指标,但其在区分主支流河流物源方面的潜力尚未得到充分验证。在这项研究中,我们应用基于图像分析的圆度测量(Rgrains)方法对日本中部多摩河和斗石河流域主支流沉积物中的砾石样品进行了测量。我们使用现代河床沉积物和阶地沉积物的四种粒度(2-4、4-8、8-16和16-32毫米)来检验区分主沉积物和支流沉积物的合适粒度。结果表明,阶地砾石碎屑的圆度分布与现代河床沉积物的圆度分布相比较,可以区分主源和支流源。干流沉积物的圆度始终高于支流沉积物,而支流沉积物的统计特征偏向于特定的圆度值,反映了其集水区和河道的有限性。识别所需的最小粒度取决于支流的坡度:在以泥石流为主的陡坡支流中,即使是细粒(2-4 mm和4-8 mm)也存在明显差异,而在以顺质搬运为主的低坡度支流中,通常需要较粗粒(16-32 mm)。此外,从河床斜坡推断出的河流搬运过程对碎屑圆度的影响似乎比岩性作用更大,而岩性作用相对较小。阶地砾石碎屑的圆度可能保留了沉积时的支流梯度和搬运方式的信息,与现代河床砾石碎屑的比较表明,过去的支流梯度可能被重建。这些发现表明,定量圆度分析为将阶地砾石碎屑与其来源联系起来提供了有用的方法,为了解山地河流的河流阶地发育和沉积物运输提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Island Arc
Island Arc 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Island Arc is the official journal of the Geological Society of Japan. This journal focuses on the structure, dynamics and evolution of convergent plate boundaries, including trenches, volcanic arcs, subducting plates, and both accretionary and collisional orogens in modern and ancient settings. The Journal also opens to other key geological processes and features of broad interest such as oceanic basins, mid-ocean ridges, hot spots, continental cratons, and their surfaces and roots. Papers that discuss the interaction between solid earth, atmosphere, and bodies of water are also welcome. Articles of immediate importance to other researchers, either by virtue of their new data, results or ideas are given priority publication. Island Arc publishes peer-reviewed articles and reviews. Original scientific articles, of a maximum length of 15 printed pages, are published promptly with a standard publication time from submission of 3 months. All articles are peer reviewed by at least two research experts in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书