Jianbo Yang, Lei Wang, Gangqing Hu, Danyel H Tacker
{"title":"Variable performance of 5 detection methods for identifying intravenous fluid contamination in basic metabolic panels at an academic medical center.","authors":"Jianbo Yang, Lei Wang, Gangqing Hu, Danyel H Tacker","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmag034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated 5 methods for identifying intravenous fluid contamination in basic metabolic panel specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Results for blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, carbon dioxide, creatinine, glucose, potassium, and sodium were retrieved from metabolic panels tested in August 2025. All 5 methods were applied to 11 862 result sets with both preceding and subsequent results available within 48 hours. Chart review was conducted for all flagged specimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5 methods collectively flagged 333 specimens, including 94 confirmed contaminations and 239 reflecting pathophysiologic changes or treatment effects. Alert rates ranged from 0.16% to 1.62%, and positive predictive values ranged from 23% to 100%. Among the 94 contaminated specimens, contaminants included 63 saline, 11 dextrose, 4 potassium, 5 PlasmaLyte A (Baxter) or lactated Ringer's solution, and 11 other fluids. The methods showed differing sensitivities across contaminant types. False alerts were associated with diverse clinical conditions or therapeutic interventions, including kidney impairment, diabetes, hypokalemia, substantial infusion volumes, and recent calcium injections. The methods differed in the likelihood of false alerts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>All 5 methods showed low alert rates with variable positive predictive values. Their performance is influenced by patient population characteristics. Local verification is essential before adopting externally developed methods for detecting specimen contaminations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":"57 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmag034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluated 5 methods for identifying intravenous fluid contamination in basic metabolic panel specimens.
Methods: Results for blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, carbon dioxide, creatinine, glucose, potassium, and sodium were retrieved from metabolic panels tested in August 2025. All 5 methods were applied to 11 862 result sets with both preceding and subsequent results available within 48 hours. Chart review was conducted for all flagged specimens.
Results: The 5 methods collectively flagged 333 specimens, including 94 confirmed contaminations and 239 reflecting pathophysiologic changes or treatment effects. Alert rates ranged from 0.16% to 1.62%, and positive predictive values ranged from 23% to 100%. Among the 94 contaminated specimens, contaminants included 63 saline, 11 dextrose, 4 potassium, 5 PlasmaLyte A (Baxter) or lactated Ringer's solution, and 11 other fluids. The methods showed differing sensitivities across contaminant types. False alerts were associated with diverse clinical conditions or therapeutic interventions, including kidney impairment, diabetes, hypokalemia, substantial infusion volumes, and recent calcium injections. The methods differed in the likelihood of false alerts.
Discussion: All 5 methods showed low alert rates with variable positive predictive values. Their performance is influenced by patient population characteristics. Local verification is essential before adopting externally developed methods for detecting specimen contaminations.
本研究评价了5种鉴定基础代谢组标本静脉输液污染的方法。方法:从2025年8月的代谢组中提取血尿素氮、钙、氯、二氧化碳、肌酐、葡萄糖、钾和钠的检测结果。所有5种方法均应用于11862个结果集,前后结果均可在48小时内获得。对所有被标记的标本进行了图表审查。结果:5种方法共标记333份标本,其中确诊污染94份,反映病理生理变化或处理效果239份。预警率从0.16%到1.62%不等,阳性预测值从23%到100%不等。94份污染标本中,生理盐水63份,葡萄糖11份,钾4份,PlasmaLyte A (Baxter)或乳酸林格液5份,其他液体11份。这些方法在不同的污染物类型中显示出不同的敏感性。假警报与多种临床情况或治疗干预有关,包括肾脏损害、糖尿病、低血钾、大量输注和最近的钙注射。这两种方法产生错误警报的可能性不同。讨论:所有5种方法的警觉率都很低,阳性预测值也不同。他们的表现受患者群体特征的影响。在采用外部开发的方法检测标本污染之前,必须进行本地验证。