Design and rationale of the RISC-trial: multicentre RCT to assess immediate discharge of syncope patients admitted to the (cardiac) emergency room.

IF 4.3
European heart journal open Pub Date : 2026-05-14 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeag078
Thomas T Boel, Suzanne Y G Peeters, Anouk P van Alem, Mark J Boogers, Marianne Bootsma, Marinus A van den Dorpel, Mehran Firouzi, Jan G J Groothuis, Martin E W Hemels, Jaco H Houtgraaf, Ward P J Jansen, Jelle S Y de Jong, Monica Jongenotter, Evert C A Kaal, Egbert M Koomen, Susan E Langerak, Gideon Mairuhu, Nieke E Mullaart, Johannes B van Rees, Mariam Samim, Eric Wierda, Steven van Zanten, Arthur van Zoelen, Marit van Barreveld, Philip M Croon, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Jan G P Tijssen, Joris R De Groot, Frederik J de Lange
{"title":"Design and rationale of the RISC-trial: multicentre <i>R</i>CT to assess <i>i</i>mmediate discharge of <i>s</i>yncope patients admitted to the (<i>c</i>ardiac) emergency room.","authors":"Thomas T Boel, Suzanne Y G Peeters, Anouk P van Alem, Mark J Boogers, Marianne Bootsma, Marinus A van den Dorpel, Mehran Firouzi, Jan G J Groothuis, Martin E W Hemels, Jaco H Houtgraaf, Ward P J Jansen, Jelle S Y de Jong, Monica Jongenotter, Evert C A Kaal, Egbert M Koomen, Susan E Langerak, Gideon Mairuhu, Nieke E Mullaart, Johannes B van Rees, Mariam Samim, Eric Wierda, Steven van Zanten, Arthur van Zoelen, Marit van Barreveld, Philip M Croon, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Jan G P Tijssen, Joris R De Groot, Frederik J de Lange","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeag078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Syncope is responsible for 1-3% of emergency department presentations. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines on syncope recommend a structured initial evaluation to diagnose syncope patients. If the cause of the syncopal event remains unexplained, risk-stratification is applied to distinguish between patients at high risk of serious cardiovascular events and low-risk patients, who can be safely discharged. However, there is a group of patients in whom this risk can currently not be adequately determined, hereafter called intermediate risk. In clinical practice, these patients are either immediately discharged or admitted for 24 h in-hospital cardiac rhythm monitoring. Due to the high cost of admission, immediate discharge could lower healthcare costs, hospital bed utilization, and patient burden. To our knowledge, there is no sufficient scientific basis for the superiority of either. The RISC trial aims to resolve this knowledge gap.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The RISC trial is an investigator-initiated multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 640 predefined low- and intermediate-risk syncope patients are randomized to either immediate discharge or discharge after 24 h in-hospital rhythm monitoring (1:1). The trial is powered to claim non-inferiority of immediate discharge with respect to (non-)fatal composite safety endpoints, which entail arrhythmic disorders, syncope recurrence, and (cardiovascular)death. Furthermore, healthcare costs and quality of life will be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RISC trial is a multicentre RCT that aims to gather scientific evidence for immediate discharge of the ESC guideline-based pre-defined low- and intermediate-risk syncope patients in the emergency department. Primary endpoints entail cardiovascular events such as arrhythmias, syncope, and death. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with trial-ID: NCT06472375.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"6 3","pages":"oeag078"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13252577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeag078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Syncope is responsible for 1-3% of emergency department presentations. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines on syncope recommend a structured initial evaluation to diagnose syncope patients. If the cause of the syncopal event remains unexplained, risk-stratification is applied to distinguish between patients at high risk of serious cardiovascular events and low-risk patients, who can be safely discharged. However, there is a group of patients in whom this risk can currently not be adequately determined, hereafter called intermediate risk. In clinical practice, these patients are either immediately discharged or admitted for 24 h in-hospital cardiac rhythm monitoring. Due to the high cost of admission, immediate discharge could lower healthcare costs, hospital bed utilization, and patient burden. To our knowledge, there is no sufficient scientific basis for the superiority of either. The RISC trial aims to resolve this knowledge gap.

Study design: The RISC trial is an investigator-initiated multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 640 predefined low- and intermediate-risk syncope patients are randomized to either immediate discharge or discharge after 24 h in-hospital rhythm monitoring (1:1). The trial is powered to claim non-inferiority of immediate discharge with respect to (non-)fatal composite safety endpoints, which entail arrhythmic disorders, syncope recurrence, and (cardiovascular)death. Furthermore, healthcare costs and quality of life will be evaluated.

Conclusion: The RISC trial is a multicentre RCT that aims to gather scientific evidence for immediate discharge of the ESC guideline-based pre-defined low- and intermediate-risk syncope patients in the emergency department. Primary endpoints entail cardiovascular events such as arrhythmias, syncope, and death. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with trial-ID: NCT06472375.

risc试验的设计和基本原理:评估(心脏)急诊室收治的晕厥患者立即出院的多中心随机对照试验。
目的:晕厥占急诊科病例的1-3%。欧洲心脏病学会晕厥指南推荐对晕厥患者进行结构化的初步评估。如果晕厥事件的原因无法解释,则采用风险分层来区分严重心血管事件高风险患者和低风险患者,低风险患者可以安全出院。然而,有一组患者的这种风险目前还不能充分确定,以下称为中间风险。在临床实践中,这些患者要么立即出院,要么入院进行24小时的院内心律监测。由于住院费用高,立即出院可以降低医疗费用、医院床位利用率和患者负担。据我们所知,没有足够的科学依据来证明两者的优越性。RISC试验旨在解决这一知识差距。研究设计:RISC试验是一项研究者发起的多中心前瞻性随机对照试验。共有640例预先确定的低危和中危晕厥患者被随机分配到立即出院组或24小时住院节律监测后出院组(1:1)。该试验声称,与(非)致命的复合安全终点(包括心律失常、晕厥复发和(心血管)死亡)相比,立即出院具有非劣效性。此外,还将评估医疗费用和生活质量。结论:RISC试验是一项多中心随机对照试验,旨在为急诊部基于ESC指南的预定义低危和中危晕厥患者立即出院收集科学证据。主要终点包括心血管事件,如心律失常、晕厥和死亡。该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,试验id: NCT06472375。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书