Definitions and outcomes reported in studies investigating the management of new onset atrial fibrillation in acutely unwell patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a scoping review.

IF 4.3
European heart journal open Pub Date : 2026-05-09 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeag075
Brian W Johnston, Joby Mathew, Calum Voller, Ruaraidh A Hill, Bronagh Blackwood, Karen Williams, Angela Hall, Keith Wilson, Trudie H Lobban, Gregory Y H Lip, Ingeborg D Welters
{"title":"Definitions and outcomes reported in studies investigating the management of new onset atrial fibrillation in acutely unwell patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a scoping review.","authors":"Brian W Johnston, Joby Mathew, Calum Voller, Ruaraidh A Hill, Bronagh Blackwood, Karen Williams, Angela Hall, Keith Wilson, Trudie H Lobban, Gregory Y H Lip, Ingeborg D Welters","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeag075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) frequently occurs in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), yet definitions and outcome reporting remain inconsistent across clinical studies. This heterogeneity impedes evidence synthesis and limits the development of standardized management strategies. A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases were searched from 1990 to 2024 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting on NOAF in acutely unwell ICU patients. Data on arrhythmia definitions and reported outcomes were extracted and categorized using the ISPOR framework. This is the first study to systematically examine and compare diagnostic criteria for NOAF in ICU-based research. Out of 8477 records, 44 studies (4 RCTs, 12 prospective, and 28 retrospective observational studies) met inclusion criteria. Significant heterogeneity was found in how NOAF was defined, including arrhythmia duration thresholds, diagnostic criteria, and heart rate cut-offs. Outcomes were primarily clinician-reported (<i>n</i> = 101), followed by observer-reported (<i>n</i> = 74), biomarker (<i>n</i> = 25), and patient-reported outcomes (<i>n</i> = 4), with no performance outcomes identified. Common outcomes included rhythm and heart rate control, arrhythmia recurrence, mortality, and length of stay, though definitions and timeframes varied considerably across studies. This review identifies substantial methodological variation in both the definition and measurement of NOAF in ICU research. The findings are immediately applicable to clinical practice, enabling ICU teams to benchmark diagnostic and monitoring approaches, align practice with guideline-based definitions, and identify patients who may benefit from structured post-discharge follow-up. They also provide evidence for the importance of the development a Core Outcome Set for NOAF.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"6 3","pages":"oeag075"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13252546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeag075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) frequently occurs in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), yet definitions and outcome reporting remain inconsistent across clinical studies. This heterogeneity impedes evidence synthesis and limits the development of standardized management strategies. A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases were searched from 1990 to 2024 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting on NOAF in acutely unwell ICU patients. Data on arrhythmia definitions and reported outcomes were extracted and categorized using the ISPOR framework. This is the first study to systematically examine and compare diagnostic criteria for NOAF in ICU-based research. Out of 8477 records, 44 studies (4 RCTs, 12 prospective, and 28 retrospective observational studies) met inclusion criteria. Significant heterogeneity was found in how NOAF was defined, including arrhythmia duration thresholds, diagnostic criteria, and heart rate cut-offs. Outcomes were primarily clinician-reported (n = 101), followed by observer-reported (n = 74), biomarker (n = 25), and patient-reported outcomes (n = 4), with no performance outcomes identified. Common outcomes included rhythm and heart rate control, arrhythmia recurrence, mortality, and length of stay, though definitions and timeframes varied considerably across studies. This review identifies substantial methodological variation in both the definition and measurement of NOAF in ICU research. The findings are immediately applicable to clinical practice, enabling ICU teams to benchmark diagnostic and monitoring approaches, align practice with guideline-based definitions, and identify patients who may benefit from structured post-discharge follow-up. They also provide evidence for the importance of the development a Core Outcome Set for NOAF.

研究重症监护病房急性不适患者新发房颤管理的定义和结果:范围回顾。
新发心房颤动(NOAF)经常发生在重症监护病房(icu)的危重患者中,但临床研究的定义和结果报告仍不一致。这种异质性阻碍了证据的综合,限制了标准化管理策略的发展。根据Arksey和O'Malley框架进行了范围审查,并使用PRISMA-ScR指南进行了报告。电子数据库检索了1990年至2024年关于急性不适ICU患者NOAF的随机对照试验和观察性研究。使用ISPOR框架提取和分类心律失常定义和报告结果的数据。这是第一个系统检查和比较重症监护室基础研究中NOAF诊断标准的研究。在8477项记录中,44项研究(4项随机对照试验、12项前瞻性研究和28项回顾性观察性研究)符合纳入标准。在如何定义NOAF方面发现了显著的异质性,包括心律失常持续时间阈值、诊断标准和心率截止值。结果主要是临床报告的结果(n = 101),其次是观察者报告的结果(n = 74),生物标志物(n = 25)和患者报告的结果(n = 4),没有确定表现结果。常见的结果包括心律和心率控制、心律失常复发、死亡率和住院时间,尽管不同研究的定义和时间范围差异很大。本综述确定了ICU研究中NOAF的定义和测量方法上的实质性差异。研究结果可立即应用于临床实践,使ICU团队能够对诊断和监测方法进行基准测试,使实践与基于指南的定义保持一致,并确定可能受益于结构化出院后随访的患者。他们还提供了证据,证明了开发NOAF核心成果集的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书