Self-Medication for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections (URTIs) Among Clinical Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Abishesh Shakya, Rishi Bhatta, Ashish Khadgi, Ayush Rauniyar, Sandeep Shrestha, Prem Prasad Panta, Sunil Shrestha
{"title":"Self-Medication for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections (URTIs) Among Clinical Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices.","authors":"Abishesh Shakya, Rishi Bhatta, Ashish Khadgi, Ayush Rauniyar, Sandeep Shrestha, Prem Prasad Panta, Sunil Shrestha","doi":"10.1177/00469580261452843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSelf-medication, defined as the use of medicines without prior professional consultation, is a widespread public health concern. When practiced inappropriately, particularly through the misuse of antibiotics, it contributes to adverse drug reactions and the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Medical students represent a population of particular interest, as their clinical knowledge may predispose them to self-treat conditions such as upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), which are predominantly viral and self-limiting. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of self-medication for URTIs and to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of clinical-phase medical students toward this behavior.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 165 clinical-phase MBBS students, including third-, fourth-, and fifth-year students and interns, selected by simple random sampling. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire adapted from World Health Organization guidelines, covering sociodemographic characteristics and knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding self-medication for URTIs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25 and included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and correlation analyses, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05.ResultsThe mean age of participants was 23.5 ± 2.25 years, with a nearly equal gender distribution. Three-quarters of students (74.5%) reported having self-medicated for URTIs, with community pharmacies serving as the primary source of medicines (71.5%). Only 21.2% of participants demonstrated good knowledge, while 54.5% showed moderate knowledge. Although 79.4% recognized the link between antibiotic misuse and AMR, 27.9% still believed antibiotics to be effective against viral URTIs, and 21.2% admitted to not completing prescribed antibiotic courses. Despite the majority (77.6%) holding negative attitudes toward self-medication in principle, unsafe practices remained prevalent. The year of study was significantly associated with both knowledge level and self-medication practices (p < 0.05).ConclusionSelf-medication for URTIs is highly prevalent among clinical-phase medical students, revealing a concerning disconnect between knowledge, attitudes, and actual clinical behavior. Addressing this gap will require reinforcing antimicrobial stewardship within medical curricula, strengthening clinical supervision, and implementing stricter regulation of over-the-counter antibiotic availability, all of which are essential steps toward promoting rational drug use and mitigating the escalation of antimicrobial resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"63 ","pages":"469580261452843"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13260978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580261452843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSelf-medication, defined as the use of medicines without prior professional consultation, is a widespread public health concern. When practiced inappropriately, particularly through the misuse of antibiotics, it contributes to adverse drug reactions and the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Medical students represent a population of particular interest, as their clinical knowledge may predispose them to self-treat conditions such as upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), which are predominantly viral and self-limiting. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of self-medication for URTIs and to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of clinical-phase medical students toward this behavior.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 165 clinical-phase MBBS students, including third-, fourth-, and fifth-year students and interns, selected by simple random sampling. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire adapted from World Health Organization guidelines, covering sociodemographic characteristics and knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding self-medication for URTIs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25 and included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and correlation analyses, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05.ResultsThe mean age of participants was 23.5 ± 2.25 years, with a nearly equal gender distribution. Three-quarters of students (74.5%) reported having self-medicated for URTIs, with community pharmacies serving as the primary source of medicines (71.5%). Only 21.2% of participants demonstrated good knowledge, while 54.5% showed moderate knowledge. Although 79.4% recognized the link between antibiotic misuse and AMR, 27.9% still believed antibiotics to be effective against viral URTIs, and 21.2% admitted to not completing prescribed antibiotic courses. Despite the majority (77.6%) holding negative attitudes toward self-medication in principle, unsafe practices remained prevalent. The year of study was significantly associated with both knowledge level and self-medication practices (p < 0.05).ConclusionSelf-medication for URTIs is highly prevalent among clinical-phase medical students, revealing a concerning disconnect between knowledge, attitudes, and actual clinical behavior. Addressing this gap will require reinforcing antimicrobial stewardship within medical curricula, strengthening clinical supervision, and implementing stricter regulation of over-the-counter antibiotic availability, all of which are essential steps toward promoting rational drug use and mitigating the escalation of antimicrobial resistance.

临床医学生上呼吸道感染的自我药物治疗:知识、态度和实践的横断面研究
自我药疗,定义为未经事先专业咨询而使用药物,是一个广泛的公共卫生问题。如果操作不当,特别是通过滥用抗生素,它会导致药物不良反应和抗菌素耐药性(AMR)日益增长的威胁。医学生代表了一个特别感兴趣的人群,因为他们的临床知识可能使他们倾向于自我治疗的疾病,如上呼吸道感染(URTIs),这主要是病毒性和自限性的。本研究旨在评估尿路感染自我药疗的流行程度,并评估临床阶段医学生对这种行为的知识、态度和实践。方法采用简单随机抽样的方法,对165名临床期MBBS学生(包括三、四、五年级学生和实习生)进行横断面研究。数据的收集采用了一份根据世界卫生组织指南改编的结构化、自我管理的问卷,涵盖了社会人口特征以及关于尿道感染自我用药的知识、态度和做法。统计学分析采用SPSS 25版本,包括描述性统计、卡方检验和相关分析,p < 0.05为统计学显著性。结果参与者的平均年龄为23.5±2.25岁,性别分布基本相等。四分之三的学生(74.5%)报告自己对尿路感染进行药物治疗,社区药房是药物的主要来源(71.5%)。只有21.2%的参与者表现出良好的知识,而54.5%的参与者表现出中等的知识。尽管79.4%的人认识到抗生素滥用与抗生素耐药性之间的联系,27.9%的人仍然认为抗生素对病毒性尿路感染有效,21.2%的人承认没有完成规定的抗生素疗程。尽管大多数人(77.6%)原则上对自我药疗持否定态度,但不安全的做法仍然普遍存在。学习年限与知识水平和自我药疗行为均显著相关(p < 0.05)。结论临床阶段医学生自用药物治疗尿路感染的比例较高,存在知识、态度与实际临床行为的脱节。解决这一差距需要在医学课程中加强抗菌素管理,加强临床监督,并对非处方抗生素的可得性实施更严格的监管,所有这些都是促进合理用药和缓解抗菌素耐药性升级的重要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书