Minding the Gap: Complex Relational Trauma Survivors' Experiences Navigating Healthcare.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Colette M Smart, Mitchell L Gaudry, Nika Marefat, Lori Herod, Jessica Lazar, Malachi Gillihan
{"title":"Minding the Gap: Complex Relational Trauma Survivors' Experiences Navigating Healthcare.","authors":"Colette M Smart, Mitchell L Gaudry, Nika Marefat, Lori Herod, Jessica Lazar, Malachi Gillihan","doi":"10.1177/00469580261453985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionComplex relational trauma (CRT) occurs in close relationships where adversity is prolonged, repeated and inescapable. Despite the known connections between CRT and adverse health outcomes, anecdotal reports from survivors indicate that education on CRT is not translating into more effective clinical practice, resulting in substandard and even harmful experiences of healthcare.MethodsUsing a patient-oriented research methodology, we recruited N = 13 participants with CRT from Canada and the United States. The sample was primarily female (N = 9), with a range of ages (20-69 years) and races/ethnicities. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and participated in an individual qualitative healthcare interview. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive/deductive thematic analysis using NVivo 15.ResultsIn terms of both mental and medical healthcare, similar themes emerged, including structural and financial barriers to care, experiences of invisibility, invalidation, and re-traumatization, identification of factors that supported safety, trust, and disclosure, as well as a need for specialized understanding of CRT as distinct from PTSD. Meta-themes that emerged included a need for practitioners to better understand the intersection of physical and mental health concerns in persons with CRT, as well as more integrative and holistic care.ConclusionsPeople with CRT report that they are not currently being well served in the healthcare system. Future research should ascertain providers/trainees' knowledge and skill base regarding CRT, which can inform on opportunities for further education. Findings also suggest that survivors would benefit from efforts to address siloed care, which undermines effective pathways to health and well-being in survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"63 ","pages":"469580261453985"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13261038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580261453985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionComplex relational trauma (CRT) occurs in close relationships where adversity is prolonged, repeated and inescapable. Despite the known connections between CRT and adverse health outcomes, anecdotal reports from survivors indicate that education on CRT is not translating into more effective clinical practice, resulting in substandard and even harmful experiences of healthcare.MethodsUsing a patient-oriented research methodology, we recruited N = 13 participants with CRT from Canada and the United States. The sample was primarily female (N = 9), with a range of ages (20-69 years) and races/ethnicities. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and participated in an individual qualitative healthcare interview. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive/deductive thematic analysis using NVivo 15.ResultsIn terms of both mental and medical healthcare, similar themes emerged, including structural and financial barriers to care, experiences of invisibility, invalidation, and re-traumatization, identification of factors that supported safety, trust, and disclosure, as well as a need for specialized understanding of CRT as distinct from PTSD. Meta-themes that emerged included a need for practitioners to better understand the intersection of physical and mental health concerns in persons with CRT, as well as more integrative and holistic care.ConclusionsPeople with CRT report that they are not currently being well served in the healthcare system. Future research should ascertain providers/trainees' knowledge and skill base regarding CRT, which can inform on opportunities for further education. Findings also suggest that survivors would benefit from efforts to address siloed care, which undermines effective pathways to health and well-being in survivors.

注意差距:复杂的关系创伤幸存者的经验导航医疗保健。
复杂的关系创伤(CRT)发生在亲密关系中,逆境是长期的,重复的和不可避免的。尽管已知CRT与不良健康结果之间存在联系,但幸存者的轶事报告表明,CRT教育并未转化为更有效的临床实践,导致不合格甚至有害的医疗保健体验。方法采用以患者为中心的研究方法,我们从加拿大和美国招募了N = 13名接受CRT治疗的参与者。样本主要是女性(N = 9),年龄范围(20-69岁)和种族/民族。参与者完成了一份人口调查问卷,并参加了一次个人定性医疗保健访谈。使用NVivo 15对数据进行混合归纳/演绎主题分析。结果在精神和医疗保健方面,出现了类似的主题,包括护理的结构和经济障碍,隐形,无效和再创伤的经历,支持安全,信任和披露的因素的识别,以及需要专门理解CRT与创伤后应激障碍的区别。出现的元主题包括从业人员需要更好地了解CRT患者的身心健康问题的交叉点,以及更加综合和全面的护理。结论有CRT的人报告他们目前在医疗保健系统中没有得到很好的服务。未来的研究应确定提供者/受训者在CRT方面的知识和技能基础,这可以为进一步教育的机会提供信息。调查结果还表明,幸存者将受益于解决孤立护理问题的努力,因为孤立护理破坏了幸存者获得健康和福祉的有效途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书