Colette M Smart, Mitchell L Gaudry, Nika Marefat, Lori Herod, Jessica Lazar, Malachi Gillihan
{"title":"Minding the Gap: Complex Relational Trauma Survivors' Experiences Navigating Healthcare.","authors":"Colette M Smart, Mitchell L Gaudry, Nika Marefat, Lori Herod, Jessica Lazar, Malachi Gillihan","doi":"10.1177/00469580261453985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionComplex relational trauma (CRT) occurs in close relationships where adversity is prolonged, repeated and inescapable. Despite the known connections between CRT and adverse health outcomes, anecdotal reports from survivors indicate that education on CRT is not translating into more effective clinical practice, resulting in substandard and even harmful experiences of healthcare.MethodsUsing a patient-oriented research methodology, we recruited N = 13 participants with CRT from Canada and the United States. The sample was primarily female (N = 9), with a range of ages (20-69 years) and races/ethnicities. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and participated in an individual qualitative healthcare interview. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive/deductive thematic analysis using NVivo 15.ResultsIn terms of both mental and medical healthcare, similar themes emerged, including structural and financial barriers to care, experiences of invisibility, invalidation, and re-traumatization, identification of factors that supported safety, trust, and disclosure, as well as a need for specialized understanding of CRT as distinct from PTSD. Meta-themes that emerged included a need for practitioners to better understand the intersection of physical and mental health concerns in persons with CRT, as well as more integrative and holistic care.ConclusionsPeople with CRT report that they are not currently being well served in the healthcare system. Future research should ascertain providers/trainees' knowledge and skill base regarding CRT, which can inform on opportunities for further education. Findings also suggest that survivors would benefit from efforts to address siloed care, which undermines effective pathways to health and well-being in survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"63 ","pages":"469580261453985"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13261038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580261453985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionComplex relational trauma (CRT) occurs in close relationships where adversity is prolonged, repeated and inescapable. Despite the known connections between CRT and adverse health outcomes, anecdotal reports from survivors indicate that education on CRT is not translating into more effective clinical practice, resulting in substandard and even harmful experiences of healthcare.MethodsUsing a patient-oriented research methodology, we recruited N = 13 participants with CRT from Canada and the United States. The sample was primarily female (N = 9), with a range of ages (20-69 years) and races/ethnicities. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and participated in an individual qualitative healthcare interview. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive/deductive thematic analysis using NVivo 15.ResultsIn terms of both mental and medical healthcare, similar themes emerged, including structural and financial barriers to care, experiences of invisibility, invalidation, and re-traumatization, identification of factors that supported safety, trust, and disclosure, as well as a need for specialized understanding of CRT as distinct from PTSD. Meta-themes that emerged included a need for practitioners to better understand the intersection of physical and mental health concerns in persons with CRT, as well as more integrative and holistic care.ConclusionsPeople with CRT report that they are not currently being well served in the healthcare system. Future research should ascertain providers/trainees' knowledge and skill base regarding CRT, which can inform on opportunities for further education. Findings also suggest that survivors would benefit from efforts to address siloed care, which undermines effective pathways to health and well-being in survivors.
期刊介绍:
INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.