FEDERATED LEARNING OF ROBUST INDIVIDUALIZED DECISION RULES WITH APPLICATION TO HETEROGENEOUS MULTIHOSPITAL SEPSIS POPULATION.

IF 1.5 4区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Annals of Applied Statistics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-28 DOI:10.1214/25-aoas2017
Xinlei Chen, Victor B Talisa, Xiaoqing Tan, Zhengling Qi, Jason N Kennedy, Chung-Chou H Chang, Christopher W Seymour, Lu Tang
{"title":"FEDERATED LEARNING OF ROBUST INDIVIDUALIZED DECISION RULES WITH APPLICATION TO HETEROGENEOUS MULTIHOSPITAL SEPSIS POPULATION.","authors":"Xinlei Chen, Victor B Talisa, Xiaoqing Tan, Zhengling Qi, Jason N Kennedy, Chung-Chou H Chang, Christopher W Seymour, Lu Tang","doi":"10.1214/25-aoas2017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition affecting millions of individuals in the U.S. each year. The complexity of sepsis clinical management makes individualized treatment approaches desirable. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) has collected electronic health records data of sepsis patients from multiple hospitals. The goal of this study is to derive individualized decision rules (IDRs) that could be safely applied to and uniformly improve decision-making across hospitals in the UPMC Health System by only using a subset of hospitals for training. Traditional approaches assume that data are sampled from a single population of interest. With multiple hospitals that vary in patient populations, treatments, and provider teams, an IDR that is successful in one hospital may not be as effective in another, and the performance achieved by a globally optimal IDR may vary greatly across hospitals, preventing it from being safely applied to unseen hospitals. To address these challenges as well as the practical restriction of data sharing across hospitals, we introduce a new objective function and a federated learning algorithm for learning IDRs that are robust to distributional uncertainty from heterogeneous data. The proposed framework uses a conditional maximin objective to enhance individual outcomes across hospitals, ensuring robustness against hospital-level variations. Compared to the traditional approach, the proposed method enhances the survival rate by 10 percentage points among patients who may experience extreme adverse outcomes across hospitals. Additionally, it increases the overall survival rate by two to three percentage points when the learned IDR is applied to unseen hospital populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50772,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Statistics","volume":"19 2","pages":"1270-1291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13251606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Applied Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/25-aoas2017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition affecting millions of individuals in the U.S. each year. The complexity of sepsis clinical management makes individualized treatment approaches desirable. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) has collected electronic health records data of sepsis patients from multiple hospitals. The goal of this study is to derive individualized decision rules (IDRs) that could be safely applied to and uniformly improve decision-making across hospitals in the UPMC Health System by only using a subset of hospitals for training. Traditional approaches assume that data are sampled from a single population of interest. With multiple hospitals that vary in patient populations, treatments, and provider teams, an IDR that is successful in one hospital may not be as effective in another, and the performance achieved by a globally optimal IDR may vary greatly across hospitals, preventing it from being safely applied to unseen hospitals. To address these challenges as well as the practical restriction of data sharing across hospitals, we introduce a new objective function and a federated learning algorithm for learning IDRs that are robust to distributional uncertainty from heterogeneous data. The proposed framework uses a conditional maximin objective to enhance individual outcomes across hospitals, ensuring robustness against hospital-level variations. Compared to the traditional approach, the proposed method enhances the survival rate by 10 percentage points among patients who may experience extreme adverse outcomes across hospitals. Additionally, it increases the overall survival rate by two to three percentage points when the learned IDR is applied to unseen hospital populations.

鲁棒个性化决策规则的联合学习及其在异质多医院败血症人群中的应用。
败血症是一种危及生命的疾病,每年影响数百万美国人。脓毒症临床管理的复杂性使得个性化的治疗方法是可取的。匹兹堡大学医学中心(UPMC)收集了多家医院败血症患者的电子健康记录数据。本研究的目的是得出个性化决策规则(idr),该规则可以安全地应用于UPMC卫生系统中各医院的决策,并通过仅使用一部分医院进行培训来统一改进决策。传统的方法假设数据是从单个感兴趣的群体中抽样的。由于多家医院的患者群体、治疗方法和提供者团队各不相同,在一家医院取得成功的IDR在另一家医院可能并不那么有效,而且全局最优IDR所取得的性能在各医院之间可能存在很大差异,因此无法安全地应用于未见过的医院。为了解决这些挑战以及跨医院数据共享的实际限制,我们引入了一个新的目标函数和一种联邦学习算法,用于学习对异构数据的分布不确定性具有鲁棒性的idr。所提出的框架使用条件最大化目标来提高医院之间的个体结果,确保对医院水平变化的稳健性。与传统方法相比,所提出的方法在可能经历极端不良后果的患者中提高了10个百分点的存活率。此外,当学习到的IDR应用于未见过的医院人群时,它将总存活率提高了2到3个百分点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Applied Statistics
Annals of Applied Statistics 社会科学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical research spans an enormous range from direct subject-matter collaborations to pure mathematical theory. The Annals of Applied Statistics, the newest journal from the IMS, is aimed at papers in the applied half of this range. Published quarterly in both print and electronic form, our goal is to provide a timely and unified forum for all areas of applied statistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书