The GUIDE-CDSS framework: a comprehensive framework to GUIDE and evaluate the implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems in healthcare, based on an overview of reviews.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Esther R C Janssen, Jesper Knoop, Gianmatteo Farabolini, Nicoló Baldini, Thomas Hoogeboom, Maria Gabriella Ceravolo, Stefano Negrini, Carlotte Kiekens
{"title":"The GUIDE-CDSS framework: a comprehensive framework to GUIDE and evaluate the implementation of Clinical Decision Support Systems in healthcare, based on an overview of reviews.","authors":"Esther R C Janssen, Jesper Knoop, Gianmatteo Farabolini, Nicoló Baldini, Thomas Hoogeboom, Maria Gabriella Ceravolo, Stefano Negrini, Carlotte Kiekens","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocag080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the significant potential for Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) to improve care processes and health outcomes, several barriers hinder their widespread implementation in healthcare. While numerous systematic reviews have summarized potential barriers and facilitators for CDSS implementation, a comprehensive framework to guide and evaluate the implementation of CDSSs in healthcare is lacking. This overview of reviews, aims to establish a framework-GUIDE-CDSS-aimed at guiding and evaluating implementation of CDSSs in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An overview of systematic and scoping reviews was conducted by searching 6 databases. Systematic reviews or scoping reviews that used qualitative research methods to described implementation determinants for CDSSs in the healthcare domain were included. The AMSTAR 2 tool was used to assess the methodological quality. Results were collated into the GUIDE-CDSS framework. This framework describes implementation determinants and elements within those determinants found to impact implementation of CDSSs in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three reviews were included in the analysis. All reviews had at least 2 critical weaknesses, showing a limited methodological quality of included reviews. Eight determinants and 38 elements for implementation of CDSSs in healthcare and were described in the GUIDE-CDSS framework: perceived relevance, perceived effect, trustworthiness, ease of use, workflow, training and skills, resources, and implementation strategy.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>This overview provides a comprehensive synthesis of the determinants influencing the implementation of CDSSs in healthcare, collated in the GUIDE-CDSS framework. The findings underscore that for successful CDSS development, implementation and evaluation is multifactorial.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>This study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42024512455).</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":"1811-1821"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13580735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocag080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the significant potential for Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) to improve care processes and health outcomes, several barriers hinder their widespread implementation in healthcare. While numerous systematic reviews have summarized potential barriers and facilitators for CDSS implementation, a comprehensive framework to guide and evaluate the implementation of CDSSs in healthcare is lacking. This overview of reviews, aims to establish a framework-GUIDE-CDSS-aimed at guiding and evaluating implementation of CDSSs in healthcare.

Materials and methods: An overview of systematic and scoping reviews was conducted by searching 6 databases. Systematic reviews or scoping reviews that used qualitative research methods to described implementation determinants for CDSSs in the healthcare domain were included. The AMSTAR 2 tool was used to assess the methodological quality. Results were collated into the GUIDE-CDSS framework. This framework describes implementation determinants and elements within those determinants found to impact implementation of CDSSs in healthcare.

Results: Twenty-three reviews were included in the analysis. All reviews had at least 2 critical weaknesses, showing a limited methodological quality of included reviews. Eight determinants and 38 elements for implementation of CDSSs in healthcare and were described in the GUIDE-CDSS framework: perceived relevance, perceived effect, trustworthiness, ease of use, workflow, training and skills, resources, and implementation strategy.

Discussion and conclusion: This overview provides a comprehensive synthesis of the determinants influencing the implementation of CDSSs in healthcare, collated in the GUIDE-CDSS framework. The findings underscore that for successful CDSS development, implementation and evaluation is multifactorial.

Protocol registration: This study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42024512455).

GUIDE- cdss框架:一个基于综述的综合性框架,用于指导和评估医疗保健领域临床决策支持系统的实施。
目的:尽管临床决策支持系统(cdss)在改善护理过程和健康结果方面具有巨大的潜力,但一些障碍阻碍了它们在医疗保健领域的广泛实施。虽然许多系统综述总结了CDSS实施的潜在障碍和促进因素,但缺乏一个指导和评估CDSS在医疗保健领域实施的全面框架。本综述旨在建立一个框架-指南- cdss,旨在指导和评估cdss在医疗保健中的实施。材料和方法:通过检索6个数据库进行系统和范围综述。包括使用定性研究方法描述医疗保健领域cdss实施决定因素的系统评价或范围评价。使用AMSTAR 2工具评估方法学质量。结果被整理到GUIDE-CDSS框架中。本框架描述了影响医疗保健中cdss实施的实施决定因素和这些决定因素中的元素。结果:23篇综述被纳入分析。所有的综述至少有2个关键性的弱点,表明纳入的综述的方法学质量有限。指南- cdss框架描述了在医疗保健领域实施cdss的8个决定因素和38个要素:感知相关性、感知效果、可信度、易用性、工作流程、培训和技能、资源和实施策略。讨论和结论:本概述全面综合了影响cdss在医疗保健领域实施的决定因素,并在GUIDE-CDSS框架中进行了整理。研究结果强调,CDSS的成功开发、实施和评价是多因素的。方案注册:本研究在PROSPERO (No. 6)注册。CRD42024512455)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书