A Clinical Decision Support System to Optimize Antimicrobial Dosing in Patients with Renal Impairment.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2893-7843
Ana Garcia-Souto, Sara Ibáñez-García, Beatriz Torroba-Sanz, Gonzalo Domínguez-Chaparro, Maria Nuñez-Nuñez, Maria Eugenia Velasco-García, Jose Luis de la Rosa-Triviño, Ana Herranz-Alonso, Maria Sanjurjo-Sáez
{"title":"A Clinical Decision Support System to Optimize Antimicrobial Dosing in Patients with Renal Impairment.","authors":"Ana Garcia-Souto, Sara Ibáñez-García, Beatriz Torroba-Sanz, Gonzalo Domínguez-Chaparro, Maria Nuñez-Nuñez, Maria Eugenia Velasco-García, Jose Luis de la Rosa-Triviño, Ana Herranz-Alonso, Maria Sanjurjo-Sáez","doi":"10.1055/a-2893-7843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a targeted set of clinical rules embedded within a clinical decision support system to support safer antimicrobial dosing in patients with impaired renal function and to assist antimicrobial stewardship activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical rules for renal dose adjustment were developed through a structured literature review and consensus by a multidisciplinary team. The rules were implemented within a clinical decision support system integrated with electronic prescribing, electronic health records, and laboratory data, through HL7 messaging and supported by a NoSQL database architecture. A 9-week pilot validation study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital, during which alerts were reviewed by pharmacists. System effectiveness was assessed by alert review rates, pharmacist interventions, physician acceptance, and positive predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 58 clinical rules were implemented. During the validation period, 409 alerts were generated for 249 patients, of which 352 alerts (86%) were reviewed by pharmacists. Pharmacist interventions were performed for 190 alerts (54%). Among 156 assessable interventions, 111 (71%) were accepted by physicians, resulting in antimicrobial dose modifications. The overall positive predictive value of the clinical rule set was 0.32. Acceptance rates varied across clinical settings, ranging from 57% in surgical units to 80% in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a consensus-based bundle of clinical rules within a clinical decision support system generated actionable renal dosing alerts and supported pharmacist-led interventions with high prescriber acceptance. This informatics-enabled approach supports safer antimicrobial dosing decisions in patients with renal impairment and may help reduce the risk of medication-related harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"502-509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13293636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2893-7843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a targeted set of clinical rules embedded within a clinical decision support system to support safer antimicrobial dosing in patients with impaired renal function and to assist antimicrobial stewardship activities.

Methods: Clinical rules for renal dose adjustment were developed through a structured literature review and consensus by a multidisciplinary team. The rules were implemented within a clinical decision support system integrated with electronic prescribing, electronic health records, and laboratory data, through HL7 messaging and supported by a NoSQL database architecture. A 9-week pilot validation study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital, during which alerts were reviewed by pharmacists. System effectiveness was assessed by alert review rates, pharmacist interventions, physician acceptance, and positive predictive value.

Results: A total of 58 clinical rules were implemented. During the validation period, 409 alerts were generated for 249 patients, of which 352 alerts (86%) were reviewed by pharmacists. Pharmacist interventions were performed for 190 alerts (54%). Among 156 assessable interventions, 111 (71%) were accepted by physicians, resulting in antimicrobial dose modifications. The overall positive predictive value of the clinical rule set was 0.32. Acceptance rates varied across clinical settings, ranging from 57% in surgical units to 80% in the emergency department.

Conclusion: Implementation of a consensus-based bundle of clinical rules within a clinical decision support system generated actionable renal dosing alerts and supported pharmacist-led interventions with high prescriber acceptance. This informatics-enabled approach supports safer antimicrobial dosing decisions in patients with renal impairment and may help reduce the risk of medication-related harm.

优化肾脏损害患者抗菌药物剂量的临床决策支持系统。
目的开发和验证嵌入临床决策支持系统的一套有针对性的临床规则,以支持肾功能受损患者更安全的抗微生物药物剂量,并协助抗微生物药物管理活动。方法通过结构化的文献回顾和多学科团队的共识,制定肾脏剂量调整的临床规则。这些规则通过HL7消息传递在与电子处方、电子健康记录和实验室数据集成的临床决策支持系统中实现,并由NoSQL数据库体系结构提供支持。在一家三级保健医院进行了为期9周的试点验证研究,期间药剂师对警报进行了审查。系统的有效性通过警报回顾率、药剂师干预、医生接受度和阳性预测值来评估。结果共执行了58条临床规则。在验证期内,249名患者产生了409个警报,其中352个警报(86%)由药剂师审查。对190例报警(54%)进行药师干预。在156项可评估的干预措施中,111项(71%)被医生接受,导致抗菌药物剂量改变。临床规则集的总体阳性预测值为0.32。接受率因临床环境而异,从外科的57%到急诊科的80%不等。结论:在临床决策支持系统中实施一套基于共识的临床规则,可产生可操作的肾脏剂量警报,并支持药剂师主导的干预措施,处方者接受度高。这种信息学支持的方法支持肾损害患者更安全的抗微生物药物剂量决策,并可能有助于降低药物相关伤害的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书