Multicenter Study Suggests Unsupervised Learning Derived From MRI Identifies Prognostic Subgroups in Prostate Cancer Patients After Prostatectomy.

IF 1.4 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2026-06-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/rrp/6424056
Guoqing Hu, Xiaofeng Liu, Zhangzhe Chen, Bingni Zhou, Hualei Gan, Ruchuan Chen, Liangping Zhou, Yajia Gu, Xiaohang Liu
{"title":"Multicenter Study Suggests Unsupervised Learning Derived From MRI Identifies Prognostic Subgroups in Prostate Cancer Patients After Prostatectomy.","authors":"Guoqing Hu, Xiaofeng Liu, Zhangzhe Chen, Bingni Zhou, Hualei Gan, Ruchuan Chen, Liangping Zhou, Yajia Gu, Xiaohang Liu","doi":"10.1155/rrp/6424056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify subgroups of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features and evaluate the prognostic value in predicting 5-year progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Preoperative MRI and clinical data from 400 patients (185 with recurrence) were collected from three centers (one training and two external validation groups). Radiomics features were extracted from index lesions. PFS-associated clinical and radiomics features were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox analysis. The K-means clustering method was used to identify subgroups and construct a Radiomic-Clinical model. PFS differences across subgroups were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. The predictive performance of the Radiomic-Clinical model was compared with the European Association of Urology (EAU), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA), and PIPEN models using the concordance index (C-index).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 clinical and 13 radiomics features were selected, and three distinct prognostic subgroups were identified within the Radiomic-Clinical model. The Radiomic-Clinical model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy with C-indices of 0.82 (training group), 0.78 (validation group 1), and 0.79 (validation group 2), outperforming the EAU (0.68, 0.70, and 0.65), CAPRA (0.71, 0.67, and 0.70), and PIPEN models (0.71, 0.70, and 0.68) (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unsupervised learning using radiomics and clinical data effectively identifies distinct prognostic subgroups in PCa patients after RP, offering superior predictive performance over existing models for 5-year PFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":51864,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Research and Practice","volume":"2026 ","pages":"6424056"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13250766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/rrp/6424056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify subgroups of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features and evaluate the prognostic value in predicting 5-year progression-free survival (PFS).

Materials: Preoperative MRI and clinical data from 400 patients (185 with recurrence) were collected from three centers (one training and two external validation groups). Radiomics features were extracted from index lesions. PFS-associated clinical and radiomics features were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox analysis. The K-means clustering method was used to identify subgroups and construct a Radiomic-Clinical model. PFS differences across subgroups were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. The predictive performance of the Radiomic-Clinical model was compared with the European Association of Urology (EAU), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA), and PIPEN models using the concordance index (C-index).

Results: A total of 5 clinical and 13 radiomics features were selected, and three distinct prognostic subgroups were identified within the Radiomic-Clinical model. The Radiomic-Clinical model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy with C-indices of 0.82 (training group), 0.78 (validation group 1), and 0.79 (validation group 2), outperforming the EAU (0.68, 0.70, and 0.65), CAPRA (0.71, 0.67, and 0.70), and PIPEN models (0.71, 0.70, and 0.68) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Unsupervised learning using radiomics and clinical data effectively identifies distinct prognostic subgroups in PCa patients after RP, offering superior predictive performance over existing models for 5-year PFS.

多中心研究表明,来自MRI的无监督学习可识别前列腺癌患者前列腺切除术后的预后亚组。
目的:根据临床和磁共振成像(MRI)放射组学特征,确定前列腺癌(PCa)根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后的亚组,并评估其在预测5年无进展生存期(PFS)中的预后价值。资料:收集来自三个中心(一个训练组和两个外部验证组)的400例患者(185例复发)的术前MRI和临床资料。从指数病变中提取放射组学特征。通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)-Cox分析选择pfs相关的临床和放射组学特征。采用k均值聚类方法确定亚组并构建放射学-临床模型。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估亚组间PFS差异。使用一致性指数(C-index)将放射学-临床模型的预测性能与欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)、加州大学旧金山分校(UCSF)前列腺癌风险评估(CAPRA)和PIPEN模型进行比较。结果:共选择了5个临床特征和13个放射组学特征,并在放射组学-临床模型中确定了三个不同的预后亚组。放射学-临床模型显示出更高的预测准确性,其c指数分别为0.82(训练组)、0.78(验证组1)和0.79(验证组2),优于EAU(0.68、0.70和0.65)、CAPRA(0.71、0.67和0.70)和PIPEN模型(0.71、0.70和0.68)(p)。使用放射组学和临床数据的无监督学习有效地识别RP后PCa患者的不同预后亚组,与现有的5年PFS模型相比,提供了更好的预测性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology Research and Practice
Radiology Research and Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes articles on all areas of medical imaging. The journal promotes evidence-based radiology practice though the publication of original research, reviews, and clinical studies for a multidisciplinary audience. Radiology Research and Practice is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. For more information on Article Processing charges in gen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书