Proxy patients' perceptions of genetic counselor empathy responses.

IF 1.8 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Jennine Bouchard, Ian MacFarlane, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Janice A Baker, Krista Redlinger-Grosse
{"title":"Proxy patients' perceptions of genetic counselor empathy responses.","authors":"Jennine Bouchard, Ian MacFarlane, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Janice A Baker, Krista Redlinger-Grosse","doi":"10.1007/s12687-026-00909-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Empathy, the ability to understand and communicate another's experience to them, positively affects genetic counseling processes and outcomes. Genetic counseling, a specialty healthcare profession, provides education and support for those impacted by genetic disease; thus, empathy is critical. Limited studies have explored patients' perceptions of genetic counselor (GC) empathy responses. This study investigated the types of GC responses proxy patients perceived as most empathic and why. Female MTurk workers (n = 198) completed a survey containing two hypothetical genetic counseling scenarios (Fabry disease; postnatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate) that ended with a patient statement followed by five different GC responses. Participants were asked to identify the GC response that best conveyed empathy and explain their choice. Every GC response was selected by at least one participant. Inductive content analysis of participants' rationales yielded six categories: Understanding, Problem Solving, Sympathizing, Focusing on the Patient, Validating, and Miscellaneous. Understanding was the most prevalent rationale for both scenarios (~ 50% each). While GC responses containing the words \"I'm sorry…\" were chosen most often for both scenarios (~ 45% each), Sympathizing was the rationale for only ~ 20% of these GC responses. Logistic regression analyses showed significant predictors varied across scenarios and between rationales, with few significant demographic predictors. Participants differed in preferences for empathy statements and rationales, signaling context and tailoring are important when considering empathy. Patient demographics are not recommended in predicting the type of GC patients may find empathic. Ongoing assessment of patients' feelings and needs (empathic resonance) will allow genetic counselors to tailor their empathy communication (expressed empathy) accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13263356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-026-00909-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empathy, the ability to understand and communicate another's experience to them, positively affects genetic counseling processes and outcomes. Genetic counseling, a specialty healthcare profession, provides education and support for those impacted by genetic disease; thus, empathy is critical. Limited studies have explored patients' perceptions of genetic counselor (GC) empathy responses. This study investigated the types of GC responses proxy patients perceived as most empathic and why. Female MTurk workers (n = 198) completed a survey containing two hypothetical genetic counseling scenarios (Fabry disease; postnatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate) that ended with a patient statement followed by five different GC responses. Participants were asked to identify the GC response that best conveyed empathy and explain their choice. Every GC response was selected by at least one participant. Inductive content analysis of participants' rationales yielded six categories: Understanding, Problem Solving, Sympathizing, Focusing on the Patient, Validating, and Miscellaneous. Understanding was the most prevalent rationale for both scenarios (~ 50% each). While GC responses containing the words "I'm sorry…" were chosen most often for both scenarios (~ 45% each), Sympathizing was the rationale for only ~ 20% of these GC responses. Logistic regression analyses showed significant predictors varied across scenarios and between rationales, with few significant demographic predictors. Participants differed in preferences for empathy statements and rationales, signaling context and tailoring are important when considering empathy. Patient demographics are not recommended in predicting the type of GC patients may find empathic. Ongoing assessment of patients' feelings and needs (empathic resonance) will allow genetic counselors to tailor their empathy communication (expressed empathy) accordingly.

代理患者对遗传咨询师共情反应的感知。
同理心,即理解他人的经历并与他人交流的能力,对遗传咨询的过程和结果有积极影响。遗传咨询是一种专业保健专业,为受遗传疾病影响的人提供教育和支持;因此,同理心至关重要。有限的研究探讨了患者对遗传咨询师(GC)共情反应的看法。本研究调查了GC反应的类型,代理患者认为最共情和为什么。198名MTurk女工完成了一项调查,其中包含两种假设的遗传咨询情景(法布里病;出生后诊断为唇腭裂),该调查以患者陈述和五种不同的GC反应结束。参与者被要求找出最能表达同理心的GC回答,并解释他们的选择。每个GC响应至少由一个参与者选择。对参与者的基本原理进行归纳内容分析,得出六个类别:理解、解决问题、同情、关注患者、验证和其他。理解是两种情况中最普遍的基本原理(各约50%)。虽然在这两种情况下,包含“我很抱歉……”的GC回答都是最常被选择的(各占45%),但在这些GC回答中,同情的理由只有20%。逻辑回归分析显示,在不同的情景和不同的理由之间,显著的预测因子存在差异,很少有显著的人口统计学预测因子。参与者对移情陈述和理由的偏好不同,在考虑移情时,信号上下文和剪裁是重要的。在预测GC患者可能发现共情的类型时,不推荐患者人口统计学。持续评估患者的感受和需求(共情共鸣)将允许遗传咨询师相应地调整他们的共情沟通(表达共情)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书