Questionnaires Used to Explore the Perspectives of Parents and Health Professionals on Young Children's Use of Technology: Systematic Review.

IF 2.3 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Charlotte Lund Rasmussen, Ivan Pui Hung Au, Danica Hendry, Amber Beynon, Sarah Stearne, George Thomas, Kate Mannell, Lisa Kervin, Susan Edwards, Courtenay Harris, Leon Straker, Juliana Zabatiero
{"title":"Questionnaires Used to Explore the Perspectives of Parents and Health Professionals on Young Children's Use of Technology: Systematic Review.","authors":"Charlotte Lund Rasmussen, Ivan Pui Hung Au, Danica Hendry, Amber Beynon, Sarah Stearne, George Thomas, Kate Mannell, Lisa Kervin, Susan Edwards, Courtenay Harris, Leon Straker, Juliana Zabatiero","doi":"10.2196/84712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Technology is integrated into many children's daily lives, with parents' and health professionals' perspectives shaping children's technology use. Measuring and understanding these perspectives are essential for developing strategies for supporting adults in decision-making that help children thrive in a digital world.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of questionnaires used to assess parents' and health professionals' perspectives on young children's use of technology related to health, well-being, and development. The secondary aim was to synthesize findings on these perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peer-reviewed papers published between January 2010 and September 2024 were identified through searches in 7 electronic databases. Studies were included if they examined parental or health care professionals' perspectives on technology use among children aged birth to 5 years. Two reviewers (CLR and IPHA) independently conducted the data extraction and study quality assessment. Reported psychometric properties of the questionnaires were synthesized. Deductive thematic analysis was used to explore the content focus of the questionnaire used in the included studies and synthesize the reported perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 85 studies were included, all involving parents. No study investigated health professionals' perspectives. The methodological quality of the studies was generally low, with 62 studies scoring below the threshold for acceptable quality. In total, 52 studies reported psychometric properties of the questionnaires used, of which, only 15 studies reported more than 1 measure of validity or reliability. A total of 75 studies reported participants' perspectives on children's technology use. Findings revealed that parents generally supported the role of digital devices in enhancing learning but expressed concerns about potential negative impacts on children's physical health, emotions, and behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents' perspectives on children's technology use were frequently assessed through questionnaires, though the validity of these questionnaires was often poor, with limited psychometric testing. Parental perspectives were mixed with educational benefits being recognized, while countered with concerns about the impact on children's physical health and development. High-quality questionnaires are needed to generate stronger evidence informing strategies to support families in technology use decision-making with and for children.</p>","PeriodicalId":36223,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","volume":"9 ","pages":"e84712"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13256481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/84712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Technology is integrated into many children's daily lives, with parents' and health professionals' perspectives shaping children's technology use. Measuring and understanding these perspectives are essential for developing strategies for supporting adults in decision-making that help children thrive in a digital world.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of questionnaires used to assess parents' and health professionals' perspectives on young children's use of technology related to health, well-being, and development. The secondary aim was to synthesize findings on these perspectives.

Methods: Peer-reviewed papers published between January 2010 and September 2024 were identified through searches in 7 electronic databases. Studies were included if they examined parental or health care professionals' perspectives on technology use among children aged birth to 5 years. Two reviewers (CLR and IPHA) independently conducted the data extraction and study quality assessment. Reported psychometric properties of the questionnaires were synthesized. Deductive thematic analysis was used to explore the content focus of the questionnaire used in the included studies and synthesize the reported perspectives.

Results: In total, 85 studies were included, all involving parents. No study investigated health professionals' perspectives. The methodological quality of the studies was generally low, with 62 studies scoring below the threshold for acceptable quality. In total, 52 studies reported psychometric properties of the questionnaires used, of which, only 15 studies reported more than 1 measure of validity or reliability. A total of 75 studies reported participants' perspectives on children's technology use. Findings revealed that parents generally supported the role of digital devices in enhancing learning but expressed concerns about potential negative impacts on children's physical health, emotions, and behaviors.

Conclusions: Parents' perspectives on children's technology use were frequently assessed through questionnaires, though the validity of these questionnaires was often poor, with limited psychometric testing. Parental perspectives were mixed with educational benefits being recognized, while countered with concerns about the impact on children's physical health and development. High-quality questionnaires are needed to generate stronger evidence informing strategies to support families in technology use decision-making with and for children.

问卷调查用于探讨父母和卫生专业人员对幼儿使用技术的看法:系统回顾。
背景:技术融入了许多儿童的日常生活,父母和卫生专业人员的观点塑造了儿童对技术的使用。衡量和理解这些观点对于制定支持成年人决策的战略至关重要,这些决策有助于儿童在数字世界中茁壮成长。目的:本系统综述旨在调查问卷的心理测量特性,问卷用于评估父母和卫生专业人员对幼儿使用与健康、福祉和发展相关的技术的看法。第二个目的是综合这些观点的研究结果。方法:检索2010年1月~ 2024年9月在7个电子数据库发表的同行评议论文。如果研究调查了父母或卫生保健专业人员对出生至5岁儿童使用科技产品的看法,则将其纳入研究。两名审稿人(CLR和IPHA)独立进行数据提取和研究质量评估。综合问卷所报告的心理测量特性。运用演绎主题分析,探究纳入研究问卷的内容焦点,综合报道视角。结果:共纳入85项研究,均涉及家长。没有研究调查卫生专业人员的观点。这些研究的方法学质量普遍较低,62项研究的得分低于可接受质量的阈值。总共有52项研究报告了所使用问卷的心理测量特性,其中只有15项研究报告了超过一种效度或信度测量。总共有75项研究报告了参与者对儿童使用科技产品的看法。调查结果显示,家长普遍支持数字设备在促进学习方面的作用,但对儿童身体健康、情绪和行为的潜在负面影响表示担忧。结论:父母对儿童科技使用的看法经常通过问卷进行评估,尽管这些问卷的有效性往往较差,心理测量测试有限。家长的观点混杂在教育好处得到承认的同时,也对儿童身体健康和发展的影响表示担忧。需要高质量的调查问卷,以产生更有力的证据,为支持家庭与儿童一起进行技术使用决策的战略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
5.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书