Phenobarbital as an Adjuvant to benzodiazepines when compared to Single-agent benzodiazepine Treatment (usual care) for Alcohol withdrawal syndrome in the intensive care unit (PASTA): a study protocol.

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Haustine Patt Panganiban, Samuel G Ricciardone, Tess Evans, Melissa J Ankravs, Timothy N Fazio, Nicolas Clark, Aneil Avasthi, Christopher M MacIsaac, Jeffrey J Presneill, Emily J See, Matthew W Semler, Theodore J Iwashyna, Adam M Deane
{"title":"Phenobarbital as an Adjuvant to benzodiazepines when compared to Single-agent benzodiazepine Treatment (usual care) for Alcohol withdrawal syndrome in the intensive care unit (PASTA): a study protocol.","authors":"Haustine Patt Panganiban, Samuel G Ricciardone, Tess Evans, Melissa J Ankravs, Timothy N Fazio, Nicolas Clark, Aneil Avasthi, Christopher M MacIsaac, Jeffrey J Presneill, Emily J See, Matthew W Semler, Theodore J Iwashyna, Adam M Deane","doi":"10.1186/s40814-026-01867-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abrupt cessation of alcohol consumption following hospital admission can induce alcohol withdrawal syndrome. This syndrome is challenging to manage and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Current management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in Australia is generally titrated benzodiazepine administration. In some regions, phenobarbital is preferred but evidence to support its superiority is weak.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will conduct a single-center, three-arm, open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Our primary objective is to determine the feasibility of embedding a randomized clinical trial within an electronic medical record to compare phenobarbital to single-agent benzodiazepine for patients with alcohol withdrawal. We will screen and randomize 45 patients using the Epic electronic medical record system. Patients will receive either low- or standard-dose intravenous phenobarbital (4 or 8 mg per kilogram), or usual care (benzodiazepine regimen). The primary outcomes to assess feasibility are usability, screening rates, enrollment rates, and compliance. Secondary outcomes are exploratory and include alcohol withdrawal scale scores, dose of benzodiazepine administered, health utilization, adjuvant drug treatments, and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There are limited high quality data evaluating the use of phenobarbital administration for alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Additionally, there is limited data evaluating the embedding of screening, randomization, and administration of a sedative drug within the electronic medical record. Our feasibility trial will establish whether this is possible within our health care system. In this protocol paper we detail how we will embed this trial within the electronic medical record Epic.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study (RMH2024.320 v2 06/01/2025) is registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12625000320459 . Registered on 17 April 2025. Trial Sponsor: The Royal Melbourne Hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13483696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01867-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Abrupt cessation of alcohol consumption following hospital admission can induce alcohol withdrawal syndrome. This syndrome is challenging to manage and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Current management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in Australia is generally titrated benzodiazepine administration. In some regions, phenobarbital is preferred but evidence to support its superiority is weak.

Methods: We will conduct a single-center, three-arm, open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Our primary objective is to determine the feasibility of embedding a randomized clinical trial within an electronic medical record to compare phenobarbital to single-agent benzodiazepine for patients with alcohol withdrawal. We will screen and randomize 45 patients using the Epic electronic medical record system. Patients will receive either low- or standard-dose intravenous phenobarbital (4 or 8 mg per kilogram), or usual care (benzodiazepine regimen). The primary outcomes to assess feasibility are usability, screening rates, enrollment rates, and compliance. Secondary outcomes are exploratory and include alcohol withdrawal scale scores, dose of benzodiazepine administered, health utilization, adjuvant drug treatments, and patient outcomes.

Discussion: There are limited high quality data evaluating the use of phenobarbital administration for alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Additionally, there is limited data evaluating the embedding of screening, randomization, and administration of a sedative drug within the electronic medical record. Our feasibility trial will establish whether this is possible within our health care system. In this protocol paper we detail how we will embed this trial within the electronic medical record Epic.

Trial registration: The study (RMH2024.320 v2 06/01/2025) is registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12625000320459 . Registered on 17 April 2025. Trial Sponsor: The Royal Melbourne Hospital.

在重症监护病房(PASTA)中,苯巴比妥作为苯二氮卓类药物的辅助治疗与单药苯二氮卓类药物(常规护理)的比较:一项研究方案。
背景:入院后突然停止饮酒可诱发酒精戒断综合征。这种综合征具有挑战性,并与相当高的发病率和死亡率相关。目前管理酒精戒断综合征在澳大利亚一般是滴定苯二氮卓类药物的管理。在某些地区,苯巴比妥是首选,但支持其优越性的证据不足。方法:我们将进行一项单中心、三臂、开放标签、平行组、随机临床试验。我们的主要目的是确定在电子病历中嵌入随机临床试验的可行性,以比较苯巴比妥和单药苯二氮卓类药物对酒精戒断患者的疗效。我们将使用Epic电子病历系统筛选并随机抽取45名患者。患者将接受低剂量或标准剂量静脉注射苯巴比妥(每公斤4或8毫克),或常规护理(苯二氮卓类药物方案)。评估可行性的主要结果是可用性、筛查率、入组率和依从性。次要结局是探索性的,包括酒精戒断量表评分、给予苯二氮卓的剂量、健康利用、辅助药物治疗和患者结局。讨论:评价苯巴比妥治疗酒精戒断综合征的应用的高质量数据有限。此外,有有限的数据评估嵌入筛选,随机化,并在电子医疗记录镇静药物的管理。我们的可行性试验将确定这在我们的医疗保健系统中是否可行。在本协议文件中,我们详细介绍了如何将该试验嵌入电子病历Epic中。试验注册:该研究(RMH2024.320 v2 06/01/2025)已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR) ACTRN12625000320459注册。于2025年4月17日注册试验赞助商:皇家墨尔本医院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书